salbutera
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2019
- 15,211
- 17,014
Nixing that 2-city contraption might actually have been a good thing:
There’s no $ for expansion fees… Mtl is the Quebec City for MLB
Nixing that 2-city contraption might actually have been a good thing:
There’s no $ for expansion fees… Mtl is the Quebec City for MLB
Two city plan was NEVER gonna happen.I'm disappointed, even if i had my reservations on the idea to share the team with Tampa from the start.To me having an MLB team in Montréal part time didnt work in my mind.
I have a weird feeling right now , it's like like the MLB used Montreal and was never interested to come back.
Nixing that 2-city contraption might actually have been a good thing:
Then-Canucks owner Arthur Griffiths, who was forced to pay for a new arena himself because the taxpayers refused to build it for him, tried to generate more revenue for his new arena by getting an NBA franchise to compliment the Canucks. In the process he ran out of money and wound up having to sell the whole thing to an American owner (John McCaw) The Grizzlies limped through 6 forgettable seasons and when they moved to Memphis the entire city of Vancouver merely shrugged.Interesting that the Habs would own a potential NBA team. I mean they do own the arena.
Is Molson rich enough to bankroll two big 4 franchises?
Montreal sports fans, particularly Expos fans, love them some consortiums.He has friends who could step in as a consortium.
Great post - never thought of it like that.I lived in Vancouver when the Grizzlies came into existence. They were beset by a myriad of challenges from the get-go but one of the persistent issues was the fact that they were not able to improve, either through trades, free agency or even the draft. And the reason for this was simple enough: players (at least those with talent who had options about where they played) did not want to play in Vancouver. Agents would tell the Grizzlies ahead of the draft not to select this or that client because the client had signed an endorsement deal with a shoe company which stipulated that he could not play for certain teams because those teams wouldn't get enough US national television exposure.
Now do Montreal.
The NBA would be a colossal failure in Montreal and just like Vancouver, they would never be able to attract, keep or even draft elite players.
Bronfman isn't up for spending his own money. That's the problem. He's only too happy to spend your money, but don't ask him to reach into his own pockets. He has alligator arms.I'd imagine the expansion route is far, far more costly. Not sure Bronfman and co. are up for that.
It sure does look that way now.Bronfman isn't up for spending his own money. That's the problem. He's only too happy to spend your money, but don't ask him to reach into his own pockets. He has alligator arms.
If bringing back the Expos was that important to him he could have done it simply by putting his money where his mouth is. But he doesn't really care. The team and the stadium were just part of an elaborate scam to get the taxpayers to foot the bill for all the infrastructure costs he's going to incur with his Peel Basin redevelopment plan.
I lived in Vancouver when the Grizzlies came into existence. They were beset by a myriad of challenges from the get-go but one of the persistent issues was the fact that they were not able to improve, either through trades, free agency or even the draft. And the reason for this was simple enough: players (at least those with talent who had options about where they played) did not want to play in Vancouver. Agents would tell the Grizzlies ahead of the draft not to select this or that client because the client had signed an endorsement deal with a shoe company which stipulated that he could not play for certain teams because those teams wouldn't get enough US national television exposure.
Now do Montreal.
The NBA would be a colossal failure in Montreal and just like Vancouver, they would never be able to attract, keep or even draft elite players.
I mostly agree, but i truly believe that Bronfman wants baseball back here regardless of the redevelopment or not, but recognizes the sad reality that baseball in Montreal will not work over a full schedule. Can they sell out every game for 40 games? Yes, i believe so as he feels too...but to say that would be the case over 82 games...probably not, and this is the problem...hence the 2 headed monster proposal.Bronfman isn't up for spending his own money. That's the problem. He's only too happy to spend your money, but don't ask him to reach into his own pockets. He has alligator arms.
If bringing back the Expos was that important to him he could have done it simply by putting his money where his mouth is. But he doesn't really care. The team and the stadium were just part of an elaborate scam to get the taxpayers to foot the bill for all the infrastructure costs he's going to incur with his Peel Basin redevelopment plan.
I mostly agree, but i truly believe that Bronfman wants baseball back here regardless of the redevelopment or not, but recognizes the sad reality that baseball in Montreal will not work over a full schedule. Can they sell out every game for 40 games? Yes, i believe so as he feels too...but to say that would be the case over 82 games...probably not, and this is the problem...hence the 2 headed monster proposal.
Stevie Bronfman is rich not David Tomson, Desmarais, let alone Bezo$ type wealthy, which is what Expos owner needs to be to accept heavy losses + paying for development of a ballpark.
Molson can get away without that kind of wealth because Habs will always hold high demand, but Expos … never
A very successful baseball team in Mtl, MIGHT break even… which is why Desmarais, Tomson et al have zero interestDoes Bronfman need to be uber wealthy to get it done? He doesn’t have to go into it alone and won’t.
Then-Canucks owner Arthur Griffiths, who was forced to pay for a new arena himself because the taxpayers refused to build it for him, tried to generate more revenue for his new arena by getting an NBA franchise to compliment the Canucks. In the process he ran out of money and wound up having to sell the whole thing to an American owner (John McCaw) The Grizzlies limped through 6 forgettable seasons and when they moved to Memphis the entire city of Vancouver merely shrugged.
Stevie Bronfman is rich not David Tomson, Desmarais, let alone Bezo$ type wealthy, which is what Expos owner needs to be to accept heavy losses + paying for development of a ballpark.
Molson can get away without that kind of wealth because Habs will always hold high demand, but Expos … never
A very successful baseball team in Mtl, MIGHT break even… which is why Desmarais, Tomson et al have zero interest
For nearly the last 20-years of their existence Expos were dead last… way behind second last in radio & TV revenue
Yes Bell needs summer content, but they’re not going to fork over Habs type TV $ for baseball in Mtl - for a sport without a hard cap
Back in the 90s the Expos were way ahead the curve especially under Duquette and Malone in terms of being big students of sabermetrics guru Bill James and used that analytics approach in targeting young players when every other team i the league didn’t, by the early 2000s 90% of MLB teams had caught up - Mtl simply has no chance to compete w NYY, Sox, even STL like they once did because all of them not only have $, they also use analytics to the fullest and staff w the best availableThere has been better revenue sharing since the Expos days. And there were several finishes that would have generated a post-season berth, if current playoff format were then in existence. Expos faced so much adversity, mostly in the form of shortsighted ownership that led to their demise.
Back in the 90s the Expos were way ahead the curve especially under Duquette and Malone in terms of being big students of sabermetrics guru Bill James and used that analytics approach in targeting young players when every other team i the league didn’t, by the early 2000s 90% of MLB teams had caught up - Mtl simply has no chance to compete w NYY, Sox, even STL like they once did because all of them not only have $, they also use analytics to the fullest and staff w the best available
It was also never shortsighted ownership, they knew Mtl simply wasn’t a baseball market that could constantly support a $75M+ payroll, and they were right.
Expos we’re ultra competitive from 92-94, and even 94 season they didn’t start drawing till late June….that’s completely unacceptable
Back in the 90s the Expos were way ahead the curve especially under Duquette and Malone in terms of being big students of sabermetrics guru Bill James and used that analytics approach in targeting young players when every other team i the league didn’t, by the early 2000s 90% of MLB teams had caught up - Mtl simply has no chance to compete w NYY, Sox, even STL like they once did because all of them not only have $, they also use analytics to the fullest and staff w the best available
It was also never shortsighted ownership, they knew Mtl simply wasn’t a baseball market that could constantly support a $75M+ payroll, and they were right.
Expos we’re ultra competitive from 92-94, and even 94 season they didn’t start drawing till late June….that’s completely unacceptable