Rumor: All Encompassing Jimmy Vesey Thread. All Rumors/News goes here. Part V

Status
Not open for further replies.

ghdi

Registered User
Feb 4, 2009
2,445
4
NJ
Not to mention the things we know about the Rangers even aside from on ice product:

Treat their players amazing

Yea, they certainly treated "Captain Cally" well. Many of the teams he's got on his list treat their players well.

Greatest city in the world

Subjective.


Overrated as a building. But it does have its drawing power legacy wise to some.

Original 6

Big deal. So are Boston, Chicago and Toronto. The Original 6 hasn't been a thing in 50 years. There is no player in the league who was alive when the Original 6 was a thing and there hasn't been in decades. A 23 year old is unlikely to give a crap about "Original 6".

One of the largest fan bases in the league

Fair point. Literally the only one you've offered. Almost every game is like a home game unless its against one of the other teams with a huge footprint.

Most valuable franchise in the league

The salary cap makes this completely irrelevant. Pre-salary cap, its huge.
 

Gardner McKay

RIP, Jimmy.
Jun 27, 2007
26,033
15,497
SoutheastOfDisorder
Yea, they certainly treated "Captain Cally" well. Many of the teams he's got on his list treat their players well.



Subjective.



Overrated as a building. But it does have its drawing power legacy wise to some.



Big deal. So are Boston, Chicago and Toronto. The Original 6 hasn't been a thing in 50 years. There is no player in the league who was alive when the Original 6 was a thing and there hasn't been in decades. A 23 year old is unlikely to give a crap about "Original 6".



Fair point. Literally the only one you've offered. Almost every game is like a home game unless its against one of the other teams with a huge footprint.



The salary cap makes this completely irrelevant. Pre-salary cap, its huge.

In your opinion. I think almost all of them are good points.
 

BMOK33

Registered User
Oct 5, 2005
27,877
5,055
So what is Vesey's projected ceiling by scouts? Based on something I saw from a scout taking into consideration where he played and his college numbers they think 50-60 point player So why is this guy getting so much attention?
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,063
26,791
New York
Yea, they certainly treated "Captain Cally" well. Many of the teams he's got on his list treat their players well.



Subjective.



Overrated as a building. But it does have its drawing power legacy wise to some.



Big deal. So are Boston, Chicago and Toronto. The Original 6 hasn't been a thing in 50 years. There is no player in the league who was alive when the Original 6 was a thing and there hasn't been in decades. A 23 year old is unlikely to give a crap about "Original 6".



Fair point. Literally the only one you've offered. Almost every game is like a home game unless its against one of the other teams with a huge footprint.



The salary cap makes this completely irrelevant. Pre-salary cap, its huge.

You can make excuses, but it all adds up. I'm not saying we'll definitely get Vesey, but the Rangers are one of the best franchises in the sport, when you combine all those factors. To doubt that is being in denial.
 

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,722
8,184
Are we not one of the best teams in the NHL every single season?

I'm not sure. You tell me. The last I looked, the Rangers haven't won a Stanley Cup in a long time. They made it to a Cup finals in in 2014 and conference finals in 2015. Outside of that, they haven't made it past the 2nd round since the 05 lockout. Does that qualify as 'perennial winner'?
 

HawkeyTalkMan

Registered User
Jun 23, 2015
6,271
3,445
Are we not one of the best teams in the NHL every single season?

I would say perennial winner is not the most accurate way to put it

Competitive team every year? Yes

Perennial winner is probably only reserved for LAK, Chicago, Pittsburgh at this point

Annual strong competitive teams is the second tier consisting of St.Louis, San Jose, Detroit, Tampa Bay, Islanders, NYR, Capitals, Ducks, etc
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,345
11,146
Charlotte, NC
So what is Vesey's projected ceiling by scouts? Based on something I saw from a scout taking into consideration where he played and his college numbers they think 50-60 point player So why is this guy getting so much attention?

50-60 points makes him a potential first liner. You answered your own question.
 

ghdi

Registered User
Feb 4, 2009
2,445
4
NJ
Are we not one of the best teams in the NHL every single season?

And you have so much to show for it. A team on the downturn in cap hell with a paltry cupboard and no Cups in 22 seasons.

Every single season encompasses a lot of seasons. If you said "Are we not one of the best teams...over the last 10 years" yes.
 

Savant

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
38,367
11,469
Yeah, the Rangers don't have the young talent that some other teams have, but we are a perennial winner, and even in our bad seasons like last season, we had 100 points and lost to the eventual champions in the playoffs.

I think the Rangers young talent is a little underrated actually. Aside from Buchnevich they probably don't have any top line players, but the Rangers have historically been able to sign or trade for those kind of players. What they have done is amassed a lot of 2nd and 3rd line types who are young or entering their prime.

Stepan, Kreider, Zibanejad, Hayes, Miller, Fast, Lindberg and Buchnevich are all 26 or younger. You can put Jooris in there if you want too. Throw Vesey in there and that is three lines of young forward talent, all of whom except Buchnevich are proven at the NHL level.

Girardi will be given one more chance this season and will undoubtedly be bought out or given the retire for the good of the franchise and move upstairs talk from Chris Drury. If you can replace Girardi with a guy like Shattenkirk next summer, the defense doesn't look so bad anymore. Staal will have a longer leash than Girardi but that is the trajectory he is on as well.

Nash will be very movable next summer as an expiring contract as well, especially if he does better than he did last season.

And then there is the first ballot hall of famer in net. If he falls off, the Rangers have Shestyorkin, their version of Vasilevsky, in the wings and he is pretty close to ready.

I think the Rangers could take a year to retool but reports of their demise is pretty premature in my opinion.
 

Fonzerelli

Registered User
Jul 15, 2015
2,018
2
I'll come to you
So what is Vesey's projected ceiling by scouts? Based on something I saw from a scout taking into consideration where he played and his college numbers they think 50-60 point player So why is this guy getting so much attention?


Some guys think he has a high ceiling. Pronman thinks he could be an average top 6 forward in time and possibly is a plug-and-play top 9 guy this season. Then there are the negative reviews ... this today from NHL sources posted on Eklund's column

"He wouldn't get 20 goals in the AHL...he was an older guy playing in the one of the weaker college leagues...," the source continued, "There are many better and younger players out there already. Look at Winnipeg and Chicago alone...On Winnipeg you have: Roslovic, Connor, Lemieux DeLeo and Petan....And that's not including Ehlers, Laine and Dano...All better than Vesey That's 8 forwards, all younger and better...All of those guys could get 53 points or more as 22-23 yr old in the ECAC. And Joel Armia is the same age....and on Chicago...there are Hinostroza, Schmaltz, Motte and Hartman. All better with none of the hype."

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklu...Worth-It--Tons-of-Disagreement--Buzz1/1/78703
 

JayMan82

Registered User
Apr 5, 2006
1,838
291
South Carolina
I'm not sure. You tell me. The last I looked, the Rangers haven't won a Stanley Cup in a long time. They made it to a Cup finals in in 2014 and conference finals in 2015. Outside of that, they haven't made it past the 2nd round since the 05 lockout. Does that qualify as 'perennial winner'?

Conference finals in 2012 as well... So within 11 years they've been to conference finals/finals almost 30% of the time. Missed the playoffs once in that period of time and no Top 5 picks.
 

Shady Machine

Registered User
Aug 6, 2010
36,722
8,184
Conference finals in 2012 as well... So within 11 years they've been to conference finals/finals almost 30% of the time. Missed the playoffs once in that period of time and no Top 5 picks.

Ah sorry. I forgot about 2012. I'm not trying to say the Rangers haven't been a good team. I just objected to the term 'perennial winner'. Consistently one of the better teams over the last 10 years for sure and likely an attractive option for Vesey.
 

ghdi

Registered User
Feb 4, 2009
2,445
4
NJ
You can make excuses, but it all adds up. I'm not saying we'll definitely get Vesey, but the Rangers are one of the best franchises in the sport, when you combine all those factors. To doubt that is being in denial.

Im just arguing his "points". I don't disagree. The Rangers have an allure to them that many players want to be a part of. That said, the points he gave are largely opinion and have counters to. We don't know if Vesey shares them.

Its not denial. Its looking at what the Rangers provide for what it is. There are many teams that provide similar things unless MSG and NYC are high on your priority lists.
 

WeDislikeEich

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
6,037
4,469
Yeah, the Rangers don't have the young talent that some other teams have, but we are a perennial winner, and even in our bad seasons like last season, we had 100 points and lost to the eventual champions in the playoffs.

I actually think that might be one of the reasons the NYR could land Vesey.

I don't see him going to a team loaded with good prospects in the system. I think maybe he picks a place that doesn't have a ton of good prospects nipping at his heels. Its probably more likely that he is given more time/chances to stay in the lineup if a team doesn't have high pedigree prospects to call up in his place.
 

Gardner McKay

RIP, Jimmy.
Jun 27, 2007
26,033
15,497
SoutheastOfDisorder
I'm not sure. You tell me. The last I looked, the Rangers haven't won a Stanley Cup in a long time. They made it to a Cup finals in in 2014 and conference finals in 2015. Outside of that, they haven't made it past the 2nd round since the 05 lockout. Does that qualify as 'perennial winner'?

Ehem. ECF in 2012, SCF in 2014, ECF in 2015 and are only behind Detroit in terms of most times making the playoffs since the 2005 lock out.
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
17,153
6,914
Halifax
Begs the question of what Taylor Hall could possibly tell anyone about playing for New Jersey.

He could tell him he loved Edmonton and didn't like being traded . Edmonton is the place to be . :sarcasm:


As I said before I never seen the kid play but his stats suggests he is way overhyped . Wish him all the luck in the world but I see him as being a bottom 6 player and they are available even year for cheap .
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,345
11,146
Charlotte, NC
Im just arguing his "points". I don't disagree. The Rangers have an allure to them that many players want to be a part of. That said, the points he gave are largely opinion and have counters to. We don't know if Vesey shares them.

Its not denial. Its looking at what the Rangers provide for what it is. There are many teams that provide similar things unless MSG and NYC are high on your priority lists.

I'm not sure of everything that goes into this, but it's pretty well known around the league that the Rangers are an organization who really, really, really treats its players well. Whether that's medical care, ensuring the players comfort, etc... They've definitely built a reputation.
 

ghdi

Registered User
Feb 4, 2009
2,445
4
NJ
Ehem. ECF in 2012, SCF in 2014, ECF in 2015 and are only behind Detroit in terms of most times making the playoffs since the 2005 lock out.

Who counts ECFs? And losses in Cup Finals? They mean nothing.

They don't matter in 2016. Those Ranger teams are not the same Rangers today.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
77,013
21,738
Different schools, different programs, different positions, different styles of play, and picked 50 or so spots apart. But somehow they're comparables? :laugh:

They're being compared because another poster said Vesey wasn't a 1st round calibre prospect, Rip. There was one college-bound forward selected in Vesey's draft year, which makes for the most direct point of comparison. If you want to offer a better one, or argue how Vesey's development come up short from what one would expect from a 1st rounder, I'm all ears.

I'm not sure why you think they'd have to play at the same school, at the same forward position, or have the same style to be compared in this discussion, and Vesey's actual draft position has no bearing on it whatsoever.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,840
13,834
Elmira NY
The Rangers easily have the cap space now and projectable cap space two years down the road when he'll need to sign again. The Rangers have been very nice to Vesey's buddy Kevin Hayes. IMO giving him a $2.6 mil per 2 year contract after something of a sophomore slump was pretty damn generous. The Rangers as well have a lot of connections to Boston area hockey and NYC is not that far away from Boston and the Rangers have been a very very good team the last several years.

So if you're Vesey and Detroit is too far away and you don't want to play for your hometown team and you want to play for a playoff team that is in cap position to give you a very nice second contract--the Rangers are a very very good option---fact is there might not be another team in the East that fits all those criteria right now better than the Rangers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad