The idea that anyone here can come close to doing what any professional coach does is laughable. The idea that any professional coach's strategy can be broken down into one or two sentences is equally laughable.
Did you watch last year when the team bought into a system that made the best use of their defensive prowess and had the best NYR season in decades? Let me guess, they did that in spite of Torts, Hank did it himself etc. etc. etc. Well guess what? Hank has been carrying the team with incredible performances for years and they never came close to a season like that. The team was playing a system that fit the guys perfectly and they had a HUGE amount of success. If you honestly think that Torts had nothing to do with that, and that all of those players spontaneously discovered the smartest strategy for them to play and just happened to all start playing it on the same page all at once, I guess that's your right, but I'm going to call that silly. Torts coached the team very well last year, and considering all the crap that's gone on this year (two massive roster turnovers, no Staal, less than no Richards) I think the results are pretty good.
Boston is better than NYR, especially without Staal, Clowe or a servicable top 6 center in Richards' spot - a lot better. The better team tends to win a 7 game series. Losing to a better team in the second round doesn't mean its time for a huge change IMO. There are problems, most notably the inexcusably horrendous PP, but I think it'd be wiser to bring a PP guy in than to gut the coaching staff after two seasons with results that I consider to be impressive under the circumstances. If Torts absolutely refuses to get PP help to the point he'd prefer to be fired, or he starts the next season off and things look really bleak, fine, let's talk about firing him - but at this point I think it's a dumb idea.