Proposal: All Bruins trade rumors/proposals: 16/17 Part V

Status
Not open for further replies.

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,682
21,588
Victoria BC
I hope we sell.

Liles could have a little value to some teams.
Moore definitely does. (I hope we keep him).
Morrow. Spooner for sure.

I want to sell too, but not a clean house sell, rid themselves of those who won`t be part of the future

Who I think can bring value to cup challengers who I think could be realistic trade bait

Quaider, K Miller (yep, I said it), Moore, Nash, Spoons who I don`t mind but also think is highly overrated here

Who I think the B`s would definitely love for others to take off their hands

Hayes

Who I`d like to see the B`s move but would be restricting with their contracts

Krejci (would fetch a very attractive return) and Beleskey ,wouldn`t be a great return but he`d get something
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
I want to sell too, but not a clean house sell, rid themselves of those who won`t be part of the future

Who I think can bring value to cup challengers who I think could be realistic trade bait

Quaider, K Miller (yep, I said it), Moore, Nash, Spoons who I don`t mind but also think is highly overrated here

Who I think the B`s would definitely love for others to take off their hands

Hayes

Who I`d like to see the B`s move but would be restricting with their contracts

Krejci (would fetch a very attractive return) and Beleskey ,wouldn`t be a great return but he`d get something

You got all the right names here and our problem Is this list is too long... I can be happy with any of these guys (except hayes) staying... but at least half need to be upgraded if we want to become an elite team again

It might be as simple as shuffling the boats on the deck... small 1 for 1 trades... similar to kobasew for paille and Morris for seidenberg

I didn't like either deal at the time... but they fit

We got too many guys here that don't fit now
 

remer

Registered User
Oct 18, 2005
5,850
1,820
No he should be dumped for anything.
Sides buy out was bad enough
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
Tampa bay seams in a bad way to cope with the cap next season and I think might be willing to sell by deadline time

I wonder if we can find a fit?

I like Tyler Johnson even though he is rd a and will get paid

I like Brandon Coburn too... big lhs second pair guy signed for a couple more seasons at less than 4 mill

In exchange...

Throw them spooner... I think he'd look great with stamkos on his wing
Give them Adam mcquaid... they need the warm body

Give up our first round pick or zboril and a second

The main benefit to Tampa other than the pick is they probably save at least 3 mill on cap hit.

We pay more but imho we get enough improvement to warrant the caphit and sacrifice of a kid prospect.

After making this trade it opens up the room to deal krecji with bergeron/johnson/backes and karlsson at center depth. Maybe Vegas would flip us a dman for krecji? If not I'd definitely talk to Edmonton and see how they feel about krecji and chara for nurse once chara is in his last year.

Deal like this should propel us into playoffs now... but also make us better in our rebuild too
 

BostonBob

4 Ever The Greatest
Jan 26, 2004
14,699
8,022
Vancouver, BC
I like Tyler Johnson even though he is rd a and will get paid

I like Brandon Coburn too... big lhs second pair guy signed for a couple more seasons at less than 4 mill

In exchange...

Throw them spooner... I think he'd look great with stamkos on his wing
Give them Adam mcquaid... they need the warm body

Give up our first round pick or zboril and a second


That's absolutely horrible - I wouldn't even do Spooner and McQuaid straight up for Johnson and Coburn ( who's on the hook for a $3.7 million cap hit for the next 2 seasons ) let alone adding in Zboril or a 1st round pick. It's stuff like this that makes me question your team loyalties. ;)
 

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,682
21,588
Victoria BC
You got all the right names here and our problem Is this list is too long... I can be happy with any of these guys (except hayes) staying... but at least half need to be upgraded if we want to become an elite team again

It might be as simple as shuffling the boats on the deck... small 1 for 1 trades... similar to kobasew for paille and Morris for seidenberg

I didn't like either deal at the time... but they fit

We got too many guys here that don't fit now

you won`t get an argument from me, the list is, as you said, too long and it illustrates much of the problem.

There`s much I like about this team believe it or not, I`m encouraged to see some younger players getting a taste of NHL time, in the case of Carlo, a buffet full and I like what I`m reading/hearing about the prospects but if it`s possible, I think this team may have too many prospects and there just won`t be room for them all which isn`t a negative.

Identify which of those prospects you believe could play key roles in the direction of the organization moving forward, use the other one`s as part of a package to try and acquire pieces etc...
 

Ratty

Registered User
Feb 2, 2003
12,041
3,590
Rive Gauche
Visit site
when is Don Sleepy gonna come out of his coma and make a move?
There is still a number of teams that don't yet know whether they will be buyers or sellers. Just look, for example, at the Eastern Conference standings, where few points separate top ranked from bottom dwellers.

My guess is that this will go on until close to the March 1 deadline, as teams figure out their playoff prospects and trade demands are reduced.
 

Speed Shooter

Fly. Don't look, just fly.
Jul 6, 2010
768
62
God's Country
I honestly think Hayes is just bought out this summer. Only 1 year of roughly 816k for a cap hit.

Close, but not quite.

Per CapFriendly.com, B's Cap hit from buyout of Hayes would be:

17-18: $566,667
18-19: $866,667

That would add to coin they'll already pay Seidenberg to play somewhere else over next 2 years.

17-18: $2,166,667
18-19: $1,166,667
 

Hamilton Brian

Registered User
Apr 12, 2004
4,206
704
Hamilton, ON
Close, but not quite.

Per CapFriendly.com, B's Cap hit from buyout of Hayes would be:

17-18: $566,667
18-19: $866,667

That would add to coin they'll already pay Seidenberg to play somewhere else over next 2 years.

17-18: $2,166,667
18-19: $1,166,667

It would be easy to call this mis-management. I am interested to see the number of buyouts each year to see how other teams fare.

According to this, http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/countdown-to-nhl-buyout-season-what-we-know/, there were 28 in 2014. Some teams with more than 1, but a lot with 0 buyouts.

I am actually having a difficult time find a year-by-year list.
 
Last edited:

TheBigBadB

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
9,639
2
North Andover
Visit site
The team is at the worst possible spot, teetering on 8th-9th. Not high enough in the standing to add, not out of it enough to sell. I doubt daddy Jacobs will let them rebuild so close to getting some playoff revenue. So I doubt sell is on the table.

So what does Donnie do? I just hope it's not the same as last season. Team doesn't need a couple of depth players. They need difference makers and they cost an arm and a leg.
 

CellyHard

Registered User
May 27, 2012
1,218
2,200
Massachusetts
What about a Beleskey for Boedker swap? Contracts match up really well. He's been a dissapointment thus far for San Jose.

Boedker has 3.5 years remaining at 4 million

Beleskey has 3.5 years remaining at 3.8 million

I think a little shake up like this could benefit both teams. Boston gets the speedy winger who can maybe bring some more talent and scoring to our bottom 6. The sharks get the hardworking bruiser for the playoffs.

I was thinking a Boedker-Spooner-Czarnik line would be sick. They would absolutely fly, attack on the rush and play to their strengths. Could bring a different dimension to the team. Obviously use a Schaller-Moore-Nash line late in games and for defensive assignments.

Just a thought.
 

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,240
9,911
Moncton NB
What about a Beleskey for Boedker swap? Contracts match up really well. He's been a dissapointment thus far for San Jose.

Boedker has 3.5 years remaining at 4 million

Beleskey has 3.5 years remaining at 3.8 million

I think a little shake up like this could benefit both teams. Boston gets the speedy winger who can maybe bring some more talent and scoring to our bottom 6. The sharks get the hardworking bruiser for the playoffs.

I was thinking a Boedker-Spooner-Czarnik line would be sick. They would absolutely fly, attack on the rush and play to their strengths. Could bring a different dimension to the team. Obviously use a Schaller-Moore-Nash line late in games and for defensive assignments.

Just a thought.

This a realistic trade I could see happening, one that would benefit both teams and maybe a change of scenery is what these guys need. Bruins could use a guy like Boedker and Sharks could use a Beleskey type. Cap matches well also, I would do it.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,234
What about a Beleskey for Boedker swap? Contracts match up really well. He's been a dissapointment thus far for San Jose.

Boedker has 3.5 years remaining at 4 million

Beleskey has 3.5 years remaining at 3.8 million

I think a little shake up like this could benefit both teams. Boston gets the speedy winger who can maybe bring some more talent and scoring to our bottom 6. The sharks get the hardworking bruiser for the playoffs.

I was thinking a Boedker-Spooner-Czarnik line would be sick. They would absolutely fly, attack on the rush and play to their strengths. Could bring a different dimension to the team. Obviously use a Schaller-Moore-Nash line late in games and for defensive assignments.

Just a thought.

Boedker had a lousy start with just 2 points in his first 23 games, but he's been decent lately, with 15 in his last 27.

I can't see SJ having any interest in swapping Boedker for Belesky, who is looking more and more like David Clarkson 2.0.
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
57,193
47,674
Hell baby
Clarkson was a significantly worse player on a significantly worse contract. Talk about a stretch
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,234
Clarkson was a significantly worse player on a significantly worse contract. Talk about a stretch

Was he, because Belesky hasn't exactly lit the world on fire this season.

And I said looking like, he's not there yet. But you have to admit he's trending towards that contract looking pretty awful.
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
57,193
47,674
Hell baby
Yes he was. Matt beleskey literally outproduced clarksons entire contract in the first year of his.

And he's had a bad stretch this year, he's been banged up. He hasn't looked great obviously but to call him clarkson 2.0 is preposterous....seeing as how he's already brought more to the table making less money on less term
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,234
Yes he was. Matt beleskey literally outproduced clarksons entire contract in the first year of his.

And he's had a bad stretch this year, he's been banged up. He hasn't looked great obviously but to call him clarkson 2.0 is preposterous

Matt Belesky the 1st 60-something games, no comparison. He was good, and good value.

The last 48 games played as a Bruin. 4 g, 7 assist, 11 pts.

Compare that to Clarkson's last 48 games, 3 g, 4 assists, 7 pts.

Not exactly a huge difference. Far from preposterous as you have claimed.
 

Mantis

I am a doctah
Mar 7, 2011
25,495
4,942
Crimetown, Saskatchewan
Tampa bay seams in a bad way to cope with the cap next season and I think might be willing to sell by deadline time

I wonder if we can find a fit?

I like Tyler Johnson even though he is rd a and will get paid

I like Brandon Coburn too... big lhs second pair guy signed for a couple more seasons at less than 4 mill

In exchange...

Throw them spooner... I think he'd look great with stamkos on his wing
Give them Adam mcquaid... they need the warm body

Give up our first round pick or zboril and a second

The main benefit to Tampa other than the pick is they probably save at least 3 mill on cap hit.

We pay more but imho we get enough improvement to warrant the caphit and sacrifice of a kid prospect.

After making this trade it opens up the room to deal krecji with bergeron/johnson/backes and karlsson at center depth. Maybe Vegas would flip us a dman for krecji? If not I'd definitely talk to Edmonton and see how they feel about krecji and chara for nurse once chara is in his last year.

Deal like this should propel us into playoffs now... but also make us better in our rebuild too
That is godawful

Johnson is not a RD and its Braydon not Brandon Coburn.
 

BostonBob

4 Ever The Greatest
Jan 26, 2004
14,699
8,022
Vancouver, BC
I like Tyler Johnson even though he is rd a and will get paid

I like Brandon Coburn too... big lhs second pair guy signed for a couple more seasons at less than 4 mill

In exchange...

Throw them spooner... I think he'd look great with stamkos on his wing
Give them Adam mcquaid... they need the warm body

Give up our first round pick or zboril and a second

That is godawful

Johnson is not a RD and its Braydon not Brandon Coburn.

I agree that this is a horriawful proposal but in his defense I think he meant that Johnson is a RFA ( Restricted Free Agent ) after this season.
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
57,193
47,674
Hell baby
Matt Belesky the 1st 60-something games, no comparison. He was good, and good value.

The last 48 games played as a Bruin. 4 g, 7 assist, 11 pts.

Compare that to Clarkson's last 48 games, 3 g, 4 assists, 7 pts.

Not exactly a huge difference. Far from preposterous as you have claimed.

Nah it's preposterous


Beleskey literally outproduced clarksons entire contract in the first year of his deal making less on a lesser term. It's preposterous. He's literally already provided more value and he hasn't been good this year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad