- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,835
- 12,972
What no one says when they compare him to CK is-- at the time,Chris was viewed as a fringe bust and definately an underperforming prospect-- it's only till recently he's changed that narrative around.
No, this isn't true.
21-22 year old Chris Kreider was viewed as an up and comer. It's not till he didn't progress past 50 points by age 24-25 or so that the narrative on him began to turn.
So essentially those who think they ae helping Laf by using the comparison are just actually arguing he's slightly better than a fringe bust, underperforming player.
I can't speak for everyone but I jumped in here the last page or so because someone foolishly said that we would all sign up for Lafreniere to equal half of Kreider's career. Lafreniere will most likely put up more points on average than Kreider, so no, we wouldn't all take that. Kreider is probably a floor for Lafreniere not a ceiling.
The crazy thing is that every time someone makes a ridiculous statement like "Lafreniere won't equal half of Kreider's career," or "we should dump him now for a third liner," or things like that, those things are quickly and easily refuted, and then someone always falls back on "but he's a disappointment as a 1OA."
Yeah, no one is arguing that. We all agree that so far he's a disappointment as a 1OA.