Stutz looks a lot better than Laf w/o question, but also some perspective. He’s getting 50% of his pts from the PP and has 2 more pts at ES than Kakko and Laf.Don't say that name in this thread. According to a few here, he's overrated and not worth the mention.
We need more positivity in this thread.
explain to me how his primary assist to vesey today wasn't a beauty.Based on what? There is no evidence to suggest this. Where are the NHL caliber skills
Stutzle is more skilled and more of a complete player in my opinion.Last I checked, Stutzle had 3 more even strength points than Lafrenierre.
Pointing this out is NOT a knock on Stutzle, unless you believe that Laf is a Brendl bust or a career bottom sixer or some of the other hot takes on here. Personally I think Stutzle is a good hockey player. I also believe Laf isn’t half as bad as a lot of the takes on here even though I’m not near satisfied with his play. The fact that he is only 3 points behind Stutzle at EV, while still well behind where we want him in his development, is NOT a trashing of Stutzle or a “ he’s overrated,” it’s a simple straightforward statistical comparison. It is kind of a have your cake and eat it too for some people. They want to say how great one player is and the other sucks, but they are statistically comparable. It’s inconvenient, I know, but that’s life.
he showed that quite distinctly on the biggest stage of his career during the 2022 playoffs, and frankly this is one of the main reasons I am so supportive of him during his recent struggles.Ignoring the high-end skills and lack thereof, where's the attitude, compete level and 'future capatin' mentality that was talked up so much before he set foot on the ice?
Stutz doesn't look like he's carrying a piano on his back when he skates.Stutz looks a lot better than Laf w/o question, but also some perspective. He’s getting 50% of his pts from the PP and has 2 more pts at ES than Kakko and Laf.
What did do from day 1 to earn all that high quality offensive deployment, w/ not just PP but sheltered mins with 65-70% OZ starts? Nothing. He was drafted 3rd overall by a bottom feeder.
He left it in Canada. He will request a trade to Canada soon. Watch. I get that vibe from his character.Ignoring the high-end skills and lack thereof, where's the attitude, compete level and 'future capatin' mentality that was talked up so much before he set foot on the ice?
I believe he has to go through waivers. Not happening sadly.I said it last year and was mocked. This kid needs to be in Hartford. He needs to be the guy again. He can’t even take a pass anymore. It’s pathetic.
Go down there rebuild some confidence. If he can even, I’m no contract guy. If not maybe a few games being the healthy scratch again. He hasn’t earned the time.
Become a man over the off-season. Throw out Kakko’s old video games, hang out with his laser beam’s friends and gain some F’n stamina.
Outside your elite talents (although many examples there as well), the 4th season rule has a long and consistent track record. If your game relies more on IQ or strength than blazing speed, that usually steepens the curve.I feel like that number has been going up every year. Before we know it it'll be the all important 10th season.
Last I checked, Stutzle had 3 more even strength points than Lafrenierre.
Pointing this out is NOT a knock on Stutzle, unless you believe that Laf is a Brendl bust or a career bottom sixer or some of the other hot takes on here. Personally I think Stutzle is a good hockey player. I also believe Laf isn’t half as bad as a lot of the takes on here even though I’m not near satisfied with his play. The fact that he is only 3 points behind Stutzle at EV, while still well behind where we want him in his development, is NOT a trashing of Stutzle or a “ he’s overrated,” it’s a simple straightforward statistical comparison. It is kind of a have your cake and eat it too for some people. They want to say how great one player is and the other sucks, but they are statistically comparable. It’s inconvenient, I know, but that’s life.
Agreed. I buy this argument a lot more than the “he has no observable skill” one. Challenge the kid to come to camp in the best shape of his life, make him earn his big pay day, then let’s see how he reacts.Stutz doesn't look like he's carrying a piano on his back when he skates.
Either the team looks to move him or they sit him down and tell him he needs to work his ass off to get in better shape and work on his quickness.
As fans, the best thing would be to lower our expectations to just about zero for the rest of this season. If he's around next year, the hope is he realizes how bad he's been and puts in the work.
You are certainly entitled to that take, though when I watch him he looks “not good” defensively. Not a shock for a player his age. He is also not physical. He does not seem like a “complete” player to me. But he like everyone else from that draft class, is certainly still developing. Take away power play opportunity, which he might not get on this team either, and he has very comparable stats to Lafreniere. Again, this is not a running down of Stutzle. Good VERY YOUNG hockey player who I would certainly love on this team.Stutzle is more skilled and more of a complete player in my opinion.
I liked Laf's playoffs but I do wonder if they've become a bit overstated due to what's happened after.he showed that quite distinctly on the biggest stage of his career during the 2022 playoffs, and frankly this is one of the main reasons I am so supportive of him during his recent struggles.
why wait until the beginning of next season to see his reaction regarding making his pay day? instead how about we wait for his reaction will be during the next 41 games after what we witnessed today?Agreed. I buy this argument a lot more than the “he has no observable skill” one. Challenge the kid to come to camp in the best shape of his life, make him earn his big pay day, then let’s see how he reacts.
First off, the playoffs and the regular season are a different beast. There are stakes and the game becomes much more physical. You know this. So no I don't think it is overstated, as the kids were a crucial part to our run and I look forward to future runs where they again help the team advance. Everyone is rightly talking about Hughes playing like a stud, but will he be able to play at this level in the playoffs? I'm not so sure about that. I could be wrong, but it's a much different game and he won't have as much space to dance around.I liked Laf's playoffs but I do wonder if they've become a bit overstated due to what's happened after.
2 goals in 20 games. Less than 0.5ppg. He put up 4 in 3 at the end of Carolina/start of TBL but then went 6 games without a point.
If that's him distinctly showing his compete level (basically scoring at his reg season pace) then we really need to ask the question about whether we hang on to this lower middle-6 winger or look to make some changes
I appreciate the effort, but that was a lot of words to just say "I really hope he pans out and becomes a difference maker".First off, the playoffs and the regular season are a different beast. There are stakes and the game becomes much more physical. You know this. So no I don't think it is overstated, as the kids were a crucial part to our run and I look forward to future runs where they again help the team advance. Everyone is rightly talking about Hughes playing like a stud, but will he be able to play at this level in the playoffs? I'm not so sure about that. I could be wrong, but it's a much different game and he won't have as much space to dance around.
Second, a 0.5 ppg player with virtually no PP time is solid. This point has been beaten to death so I won't go on a long rant, but his point total would look more attractive if he was given pp1 time like virtually every 1oa has gotten over the years, but I digress.
Third, asking if we should "we hang on to this lower middle-6 winger or look to make some changes" is reactionary and missing the obvious long term benefits of Laf panning out and reaching his full potential. It's called buying low and selling high (in this case, we aren't even paying anything because we won the lottery). If we have prospects then the best thing to do is to give them ice time and help them develop.
The abosolute worst case scenario is Laf shows literally no improvement and plays like a 3rd/4th liner for the rest of his career. But the best case scenario is a franchise forward. Selling now would not be wise at all unless we are getting a hefty return.
That’s fair, but we already scratched him. If it’s really a conditioning issue (maybe he was too full of himself after a great PO run and slacked off), then it’s unfortunately going to take until the offseason to fix.why wait until the beginning of next season to see his reaction regarding making his pay day? instead how about we wait for his reaction will be during the next 41 games after what we witnessed today?