KCjetsfan
Registered User
That's a nice lineup on paper, lots of skill, but I don't think we would necessarily be better. A few teams, especially the West Coasters would hurt us and beat us. Our 2nd line would rarely have puck possession if Scheifele is the most physical player out there. Switch Ehlers and Wheeler and I like it more. Send Ehlers down for another year of development, and physical maturity, without burning a year of his free agency and we are better off. Lowry is a dominant player, still improving, I don't think he gets demoted.
You also demoted our captain from the PP, are you trying to say you don't want to re-sign him. I hope Enstrom gets demoted from the 1st PP, after Perrault has shown how a player who can move the puck and is a risk to shoot it too can improve it.
I don't mind the 4 line hockey idea, but you clearly don't like physical hockey, which is part of our identity this year, and Maurice's coaching style? Curious, as well, how important do you think faceoffs are towards puck possession?
I'd prefer
Ladd-Little-Frolik (all zones)
Perrault-Scheifele-Wheeler (offensive zone)
Kane-Lowry-Burmistrov (primarily defensive, some offensive zone)
Halischuk-Cormier-Thor/Peluso/Lipon (grinders)
St. John's
DeLeo-Petan-Blomqvist
Balisy-Albert-Kosmachuk
Jaffray-Copp/Lodge-Lipon
?-Olsen-Brassard
Petan, Lipon, and Kosmachuk give us some call ups, at least, as the best way to have depth as an organization is to have prospects with entry level contracts that can be brought up, which is what is currently hampering us (although O'Dell is an unused option)...
Question, how did you make Harrison and Clitsome, and their contracts, magically disappear from our roster?
a few things you say don't make much sense. other than his line 2, which granted isn't very physical, how can you say he's not fielding a physical line up? Each line has at least two players most would consider physical.
Not sure why you think dumping Harrison in the minors isn't potentially in the cards. I don't see him as a long term Jet once injuries start recovering and his contract is pretty minimal. Clitsome may be a bit harder, but he has 'some' value potentially.
Lowry would be a 4th line C on a deeper team right now. He may well top out as a 3rd Liner legitimately eventually, and don't get me wrong, he's played a good rookie game so far, but the only way I see him being a scorer, which is what we need on a 3rd line, is by grinding out goals. It'll never happen but having 4 trusted lines is what we should shoot for, and him anchoring the 4th, playing more minutes than our 4th plays currently, would be a great situation to be in.
It does really depend on Ehlers, and I'd be fine going your route if there's any question of whether he's ready to make an impact next year. If there is a question, then I'd probably agree your projected F lines (other than 4th) are probably decent.