You guys are so unwilling to admit that Birmi is anything other then a great playerthat you're not willing to objectively look at my arguments.
Great player? Who said that? We said a plus possession third liner whose great at pking. Because that's what he was EVERY YEAR from 18-21.
Burmi in his first year in the NHL had what 7 points? Lowry will have that or more after his first year. He's bigger stronger and less likely to play Keepaway on the half wall without attempting a pass.
he's also three years older then burmi was in his first season. FUNFACT Lowry is..... ONE year younger then burmi.
After tumultuous second-year,where granted Burmistrov did score points, The Jets chose not to sign him. Instead bringing in people like DS rather then advancing Burmi.
And no it isn't just me making up numbers in my head. the reports in the media at the time of what Burmi and his agent were asking for. I can't remember the exact number but I do remember going "no way" usually you often see reports in the media that strongly correlate to what the final contract was. case in point we all knew several weeks in advance thanks to TSN what the Montréal Canadiens were willing to pay versus whatPK Subban wanted.
We don't know any of this. As mentioned prior the jets had 600k of capspace. We couldn't have technically resigned him even at a reasonable price (1.5+)
In the K where Burmi is supposed of undergoing this magnificent magical development he still is only producing at the same level as Tim Stapleton a man who is washed out of the NHL.
If Burmi's talent level is so high,he should be dominating the lesser league that is the KHL , he should certainly be vastly outclassing an older "washed up" NHLer in Tim Stapleton.
and evander Kane couldn't score to save his life in this league. As has been mentioned Stapleton's offense was never an issue in the NHL. He couldn't play d. So at the worst case scenario we can assume burmi is the same defensive player that left (a damn good one) plus the offence of an "offense only" tweener.
Burmi is now coming into his peak. He's not doing that.
So we have rumors in the media of him being difficultto coach. We have a older more experienced teammate from a similar cultural background saying he's difficult to play with. We have an organizeation that in the past has showing to be less than enthusiastic about paying the price the Burmi and his agent were asking for. And we have a player who has one half decent season under his belt.a season that might well have been a fluke.
Still can't figure out why you all think he's a definite improvement.
The best perdictors of success are things that burmi has historically influenced very positively [better then our entire current bottom six]. There is also a coach here who has pretty much said he knows what went wrong with burmi and how to handle it. There is also an economic situation that days well probably be able to sign him decently. The only real "issue" now is that he MAY be hard to play with.
That's literally the only negative.
Your telling me if burmi was a different teams prospect you wouldn't be excited about being able to acquire him for free?