Confirmed with Link: Alex Newhook for 31st, 37th and Fairbrother

Twisted Sinister

Living in Your Head Rent Free
Oct 8, 2014
2,066
3,136
I don’t see the panic. They identified a player that they believe can improve the team with his dynamic speed. All trades come with risks. But this was an insightful trade that offers immediate and long term upside and benefit. We are a better as a result of it. Its good to have insightful management at the helm of this franchise after decades of dullards running the show. Gutsy trade.

Again, I might be on the other side of this from many well-respected members on the forum, but I just do not see an organizational need for this player whatsoever, given our current and future makeup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Drebin

MadMslm

Registered User
Jun 16, 2018
2,111
2,530
I don’t see the panic. They identified a player that they believe can improve the team with his dynamic speed. All trades come with risks. But this was an insightful trade that offers immediate and long term upside and benefit. We are a better as a result of it. Its good to have insightful management at the helm of this franchise after decades of dullards running the show. Gutsy trade.

Yeah, I don’t buy the “panic move” thing.

Hughes knows Newhook well and management probably had a list of “underwhelming” young players they would be ready to gamble on if the price was right for them.

Even though I wouldn’t have made that move, there’s clearly a thought process into this transaction. And by draft night, if Hughes can get a first or a second for our surplus, it will be even more clear that they thought it out.
 

Frank Drebin

Please do your part to end concern trolling
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,814
23,717
Edmonton
The Dach-esque flip flopping most of you will do next season will be delicious. I really had a good time witnessing it first hand last season and I'm looking forward to the opportunity to do it again.
I really liked Dach since he was drafted and was excited to get him, I just don't see where this guy fits. In baldy we trust I guess.
 

MadMslm

Registered User
Jun 16, 2018
2,111
2,530
Again, I might be on the other side of this from many well-respected members on the forum, but I just do not see an organizational need for this player whatsoever, given our current and future makeup.

Don’t see the need for Newhook either, but that doesn’t necessarily scream panic move.

What if Hughes trades 5th for 7th and 22nd and then Edmundson 50% for a 2nd and a 4th.

Does that not show that management made a calculated decision to gamble on the upside of a young player while still keeping the same draft power ?

I do agree that we could have targeted something else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twisted Sinister

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
22,366
26,873
What if Michkov goes before 5? Hmm, then what? Why wouldn't they say take Smith instead?

And why is everyone still in the camp that Michkov is a forgone conclusion as a DND for our habs?

3 years is a long time and our teams makeup could be vastly different.

Wouldn't it still be foolhardy to pass on a prospect with the potential of a Michkov due to the teams construction today?

If Smith is on board, Hughes picks him it's that simple. He is their guy.

This is why the trade to move down wont be done until it's the habs' turn to speak.

It's obvious Michkov is not their guy. If he was, the media wouldn't be on a rampage to tear down his reputation so freely. Believe me, Mathias Brunet/Martin McGuire and Dany Dubé wouldn't be yapping as much if Michkov was the guy. These people are connected.

Besides, I'm pretty sure Hughes has a better guess of what will go down tomorrow than we do. I think today was a preparation for tomorrow.
 
Last edited:

Beer and Chips

Registered User
Feb 5, 2018
1,485
1,129
You're trying to downplay this deal by bringing up Hoffman and Armia in an attempt to paint it like Habs have a team who half-asses it game in and game out.

Monahan, Anderson, and Gallagher are still a good veteran group. It doesn't mean they're the best ones. But the way they play and conduct themselves are good examples for young players to learn from.
The Newhook trade and saying they have too many prospects is half-assed, You are seriously arguing that Anderson and Gallagher compare with other NHL veterans in supporting a young team. Two players most fans can't wait to trade. This is sad, enough.
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
22,366
26,873
The Dach-esque flip flopping most of you will do next season will be delicious. I really had a good time witnessing it first hand last season and I'm looking forward to the opportunity to do it again.

I think people underrate Newhook's offensive abilities. We just landed the second best shot and probably the best skater on the team.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
43,591
41,577
Montreal
LOL I love this fan base. Hankering for a Dach like move since the season ended. We pull one off and immediately it's an over-payment. :laugh:
I may be wrong but 31 and 37 are not worth a heck of a lot more than 13. Why anyone thought replicating the Dach trade was ever going to be easy I don't know. But I have a good feeling about it. On the one hand we traded for an under achiever from a tank team and on the other from a Stanley Cup Championship contender. Hughes went fill spectrum to get these deals done. That has to be impressive right!
 

Twisted Sinister

Living in Your Head Rent Free
Oct 8, 2014
2,066
3,136
Don’t see the need for Newhook either, but that doesn’t necessarily scream panic move.

What if Hughes trades 5th for 7th and 22nd and then Edmundson 50% for a 2nd and a 4th.

Does that not show that management made a calculated decision to gamble on the upside of a young player while still keeping the same draft power ?

I do agree that we could have targeted something else.

Yes, I'm not writing the organization off yet. We'll see what they do at the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs and MadMslm

Shabs

Registered User
Nov 16, 2017
2,081
2,006
I actually see this newhook trade as meaning we will take michkov. We get a young former first rounder now we can watch while we wait for our other first rounder (mitchkov) to come.
 

Trabdy2

Registered User
Nov 30, 2018
758
958
My initial impression was that we paid a very steep price, but after thinking it through some more I think it was a reasonable price to pay for the quality of player we're getting in return.

It's easy to value those draft picks highly because of the potential of what they can become, but the reality is each pick in that range has something like ~30-35% of becoming a regular NHL roster player some day (let alone become an impact player). Maybe one of them becomes a roster player some day; it's still probably at best a coin flip statistically that that player becomes as good or better than what Newhook is today, let alone what Newhook could continue to grow to be.

Newhook has some really solid tools and players his age are still figuring things out. There's still real potential there based on the flashes of skill he's shown with the Avs. The organization must feel they can work with the player and his tools to bring his game together and contribute consistently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chili and BLONG7

waffledave

waffledave, from hf
Aug 22, 2004
33,761
16,752
Montreal
OK? doesn't mean Michkov won't bulk up because Newhook hasn't.

This isn't about Michkov anyway, it's about the suggestion by Basu the habs wouldn't go this route due to his size concerns.

This clearly wasn't an issue.

No, it wasn't an issue because Newhook is a lot bulkier than Michkov. Its not relevant to what he said. I mean on some sites Michkov is listed as 148 lbs lol
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
37,189
24,020
Nova Scotia
Visit site
Another move that seems well thought out.
This kid ad limited icetime with the Avs, ala Dach with the Hawks.............

Could he benefit being with a team less stacked in their Top 6 than the Avs?

Anyhow, these guys keep doing things with 1st round picks or 1st round players involved.

There is a pattern and a process.........refreshing after 10 years of throwing darts.
 

Takeru

Registered User
Oct 6, 2014
2,239
753
If we had picks 31 & 37 in 2019 most people here would be dancing in the streets if we traded them up to get Newhook, since then he’s put up more points than everyone else picked after him and won a Cup. Very happy with the trade
You put things into an interesting perspective.
It's been 4 years since 2019 draft and despite being one of the top10 point producers from what was considered a "deep draft" at the time, Newhook is regarded by many as less than satisfactory return.

4 years from now, Suzuki and Caufield will be halfway into their contracts, with Dach needing to be resigned by then and all will be around 26-27yo. Assuming we adhere to the cup window concept, we should be into it by then. What are the odds the guys selected 31 & 37 this week are bigger contributors by then than Newhook could become or even is today.

That's the way I see it.
 

HabsWhiteKnightLOL

Registered User
Apr 29, 2017
37,594
50,536
Somewhere on earth in a hospital
LOL I love this fan base. Hankering for a Dach like move since the season ended. We pull one off and immediately it's an over-payment. :laugh:
I may be wrong but 31 and 37 are not worth a heck of a lot more than 13. Why anyone thought replicating the Dach trade was ever going to be easy I don't know. But I have a good feeling about it. On the one hand we traded for an under achiever from a tank team and on the other from a Stanley Cup Championship contender. Hughes went fill spectrum to get these deals done. That has to be impressive right!
It is an overpayment tho
but at the same time we can't draft for shit
 

VirginiaMtlExpat

Second most interesting man in the world.
Aug 20, 2003
5,202
2,785
Norfolk, VA
www.odu.edu
Newhook may not bring everything that Dach has, but he is still an interesting gamble from my standpoint. He fits the vision of a skillful, fast-skating team; being one of the swiftest draftees from 2019. A few websites have him at 5'11", and he's definitely durable. It's a buy-low opportunity, although I agree with some that HuGo might have kept #37. I don't really know whether it was a difference maker. I like to think that MSL and Nicholas will bring the best out of him. I personally like the idea of a top 9 that gets the lion's share of minutes with three competent centers. I don't think in terms of a Top 6 so much.

Hopefully HuGo can get a second-rounder for one of his vets and snag one of the top goalies, which is what our prospect pipeline seems in dire need of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FF de Mars

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad