Alex Galchenyuk Thread 11.0 - Great flashes and growing pains edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Laurent

Wat.
Apr 9, 2010
13,098
536
Montreal
My reaction to Chuckie's last few games:

NOrR9.gif
 

Analyzer*

Guest
There have been lots of penalties the last 3 games. His ice time seems pretty much linked to the games being played 5 on 5, unfortunately.

Yeah, a guy with those hands, vision and shot would be terrible on the pp. Thank God Therrien knows this.
 

Zephyr666

Registered User
Apr 17, 2013
294
7
Therrien on Galchenyuk's limited ice time :He absolutely wanted to match Plekanec's line with Stamkos which was eating minutes.

Therrien on the PP : No time praticing it with the compressed schedule (perhaps the reason why he ain't putting Galchenyuk's on the PP...?)

Ok for the line matchs eating up Galchenyuk's minute... but i still don't buy/get why he can't get 2nd PP minutes.
 

Lionel Mandrake

Guest
I think this kid's going to be decent. A good 3rd line checker at least. :sarcasm:
 

Marc the Habs Fan

Moderator
Nov 30, 2002
99,988
11,765
Longueuil
Yeah, a guy with those hands, vision and shot would be terrible on the pp. Thank God Therrien knows this.

I don't disagree, I want him on the PP too aside from the brief cameo.

Just saying the huge amount of penalties in our games the last 3 is probably the main reason why his TOI has dipped since he's not a regular on either unit. Tonight, 15 minutes of this game was PP time (combined for both teams). Last night, it was 16 minutes. Against Philly, it was 19 minutes.

Cut that in half...and Galchenyuk is probably playing 3-4 minutes more per game, which puts him in his customary 12-13 minutes per game he's had most of this season.
 

InglewoodJack

Registered User
Jun 10, 2009
16,309
673
Châteauguay
I think he's having a Stamkos-like rookie year. Slow start, strong finish which will make his rookie season look "so-so" on paper, but he'll play at this pace for 82 games next year.

Just a hunch, but I can see him get 70 points next year.
 

bsl

Registered User
Oct 9, 2009
10,346
3,642
Yes, I'm sure if we put Galchenyuk on the PP while DD continues to be useless that Galchenyuk's development will stall and he will become a Daigle-esque bust.

No worries. The moment of truth will come in the PO. If we lose the first game, and especially if we drop the first two, changes will have to be made. And more and more I think Habs are one team that could benefit from our rookies in the PO. Young legs, boundless energy go a long way in the PO.

Chuckie
Gally
And yes, even Dumont, who I've always liked.

Watch out, not many teams are entering the PO with such rookie quality. This is a bit of a secret weapon for us.

If two or three of DD, Ryder, Gio, Moen and and Bourque don't step up fast, and I mean game 1, they will lose time to the rookies in the PO.
 
Last edited:

QuebecPride

Registered User
May 4, 2010
8,017
2,449
Sherbrooke, Québec
Galchenyuk: 12:21
Gallagher: 13:57
Pacioretty: 16:22
Eller: 14:53

While

Bourque: 16:45
Desharnais: 16:35
Gionta: 18:03 - WTF


Plekanec playing 19 minutes a game, I don't have any issue. But Therrien should use Eller, both Gally way more and reduced Gionta/Bourque to the 13-14 minutes. Nothing happen with them lately, and Pacioretty could use an extra minute or two a game.

Gionta and Bourque both play on the Penalty kill. Gionta also plays on the PP. They pretty much all play the same time on 5v5.
 

cphabs

The 2 stooges….
Dec 21, 2012
7,800
5,273
He's not physically mature at 19. At 22, if they keep him alive, he will destroy. You have to chew slowly once you have the good stuff! MT knows this and should you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad