I think he's rebounding for sure without question.
Too much pedigree and ability. We have also seen him have an off year and come back and score on pace for 50 goals and 40.
The question is:
1) Does he fit the mold of the team we are trying to have.
2) Do we want to be top-end offensive heavy.
Point 2 is like Tavares with the Leafs. Yea, another PPG weapon, cool. But assets on goaltending and D would have helped them far more.
Tkachuk-Stutzle-Batherson
Barbashev-Norris-Giroux
Formenton/Greig-Pinto-Joseph
Kelly-Kaestlic-Gauthier
Chabot-Gudas
Sanderson-Zub
Chychrun-Hamonic
Saros/Demko/Gibson
1. Not necessarily, but I think elite teams need high end players (which he is IMO) and good coaches make the most of what they have (#fireDJ).
2. While I think that it may appear that way now, our top 9 on paper last year looked amazing (sucks what happened to both Norris and Formenton). With the way that the cap is next year, it looks like that might be the hand were dealt. The cap is expected to rise quite a bit over the next few years and most of our core locked up, lots of money will be left over to fill out the bottom 6. It's much easier to fill those spots than it is to find a guy who can score 30+ for you.
I love the idea of depth (brining in a guy like Gudas would be great) but I think that losing top end talent to do so is the wrong move. Last year we were hoping to improve our top 6 (and bring in a top 4 D). We finally do so, and people want ADC (and Chabot) gone.
Giroux has been everything we could've hoped for (and more) but he isn't getting any younger. We don't really have anything internally to replace him either.
Giving up on DeBrincat would be a huge mistake IMO.