playasRus
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2009
- 9,289
- 2,018
Honestly, if we could get him for anything less than a 4 year contract, could be a win. Assuming there wouldn't be much of a cap discount at 8 years anyways (e.g. 9.5M x 8 years vs 10.5M x 3 years).We shouldn't even consider keeping DeBrincat for the second year of his contract if he isn't willing to re-sign long-term by next off-season.
If he isn't extended by next summer we should trade him for a package of young assets, hopefully as much or more than we dealt to acquire in this major buyer's market, and then try to replace him via UFA or by trade with a top 6 forward that will be here for more than one season.
Walking him to UFA at 25 with a 1 year deal or his 9M qualifying offer to try to extend a contending window by only a single season would be a horrible decision that would blow up in our faces much like what happened to the Isles with Tavares and the Flames with Gaudreau.
Reason I'd rather a 3-4 year contract is that 50% of our cap wouldn't be fixed on Brady - Norris - Chabot - (DeBrincat) for a near decade. It seems like it'll be a strongly competitive team but I'd rather flexibility in those later years if we need to retool. Everyone can predict that all of those guys, DeBrincat specifically will remain a 35G scorer at 30 years old. I'd rather not gamble that.
Kreider, Ovie, Duchene, Stamkos, Nelson, Tarasenko, Marchand, Crosby, Marchessault are the only 30 over guys to have scored over 30 goals this past season.
Ovie, Kane, Pavelski, Marchand, Crosby, Toews, Bergeron, the last ful 82 game season before then. The age of drop off seems to be 31 because at that point, only Crosby/Ovie are consistently in that 30 goals/82 game category. Stamkos did it this past saeason as a 31 year old too, and many would consider him in the elite echelon of players juts a tier below generational. While Marchand paced 30 the last few shortened seasons.
Then if we talk about asset management, would trading 7OA for 1+3 years of a top 3-6 winger be worst than 1 year + assets recouped (likely mid-late 1st + B prospect)? I'd argue I want that 4 year trial of a stacked top 6 - so long as DeBrincat's camp somehow agrees to "minimal" term of more than 1 year but less than 4 year extension.