Tweaks...
Move Boyle and Yandle off the same effing pair. Put Stalberg back with Staal and Lindberg. get Glass the eff out of the lineup. get Fasth the eff out of the top 9.
thats tweaks...its also called having even the most basic understand of whats working and whats not.
First off, small potatuhs as Hyman Roth once eloquently noted. Those are not team altering moves, or slam dunks to improve the overall lineup. Besides Lindberg, you are putting the team at risk of being worse defensively, we could both agree that its worth a try but how many Pro coaches do you see making moves that will make their team more susceptible defensively?? I agree that Lindberg is an upgrade over Glass as a player, most NHL'ers would be. But again, his element of having sandpaper to his game is the closest to sandpaper this team has. Again, understandable, even if you don't agree.
He's doing the wrong tweaks at the wrong times, and the right tweaks at the wrong times aslo.
Like the game where he moved Skej over to his off side mid game... even tho he and his partner had been playing well so far that game. And it put the entire D off balance after that.
His line tweaks never work, which is not always his fault, the players have responsibility also, however its his job to find lines that work togheter. And find a good game plan. Its been lacking all year long. Henrik and Zucc saved his season early on, and they have been scraping by ever since.
His game plans seems way off, and he does bascily nothing after the game has started because he "trusts" his players. But clearly somethings not working..
Samuelsson sets the D pairings, come on man, why is it always the one man band? He's the coach but the coaching staff as a collective are responsible for what the pairings look like.
im not sure anyone here is arguing that this lineup isnt flawed...most if not all of us agree with that? i just think you have to separate a flawed lineup, with the coaches decision making process. they are mutually exclusive imho.
just because you have a flawed lineup does not give you a free pass to put your team in a worse position than they already are with said flawed lineup.
why does he get a free pass for playing Tanner Glass over Oscar Lindberg?
Why does he get a free pass for the handling of McIlrath?
all i hear from the other side is that the team is flawed its going nowhere as is, yadda yadda..and while that may (or may not) be true, it has absolutely nothing to do with why most of the anti-av crowd wants him gone. If you cant see that, im not sure what there is left to say.
Again, your roster tweaks are hardly fireable offenses when you see almost every coach in the league do the same with no depth and deteriorating stalwarts.
I explained Glass/Lindberg, I'm Lindberg's biggest fan, yet I understand why he gets the shaft.
And once again, I think all of the young guys have improved vastly under this coaching staff, going back to Hartford too, especially the defense. Mcilrath is way ahead of last year and ahead of comparable players at his age. Miller is light years better than last year. Kreider is in line or ahead of a guy like Backes in terms of well, everything. Lindberg and Skjei didn't look out of place at all, will have more responsibilities going forward.
Is it really so flawed tho? It seems most of the most trusted players just didn't get going this year. Which partly could be put on AV, and partly on the player himself.
His handling on this squad has been really bad imo. Bottom down. From the line tweaks to playing Glass and too old Boyle every game.
You can disagree with it all you want, I disagree with things he's done as well, but these things are not totally out of the ordinary when you see that pro coaches have always been this 'bad' by using whats worked for them in the past.
[