ColonialsHockey10
Registered User
- Jul 22, 2007
- 15,318
- 5,036
If Makar is the best defenseman since Orr, does that make Fox the best player since Gretzky?
The playoff picture may play a role.
San Jose has 13 wins..... 13.
WPG is having a strong season and Buffalo will fall short once again.
There is no complete defender to the level of Adam Fox. It's not even close.
he's going to slow down or get hurt imoIf EK continues his pace I don't think the playoff race really matters.
A defenseman hasn't broken 100 points in 30 years. Fox either needs to close that gap considerably or EK needs to tail off. Plus theres a chance that he isn't even a Shark after the deadline as there is some trade interest in him.
he's going to slow down or get hurt imo
when was the last time he played this much hockey? 5 years? He'd need 82 games, or close to it to get to 100pts.
but yeah, if he continues this ridiculous pace, it's probably going to him.
I hope so, at the start of the year i took a proline out on Karlsson winning the Norris, can't remember what it pays but the odds were great...also took Shesty to win the Conn Smythe, its possible.he's going to slow down or get hurt imo
when was the last time he played this much hockey? 5 years? He'd need 82 games, or close to it to get to 100pts.
but yeah, if he continues this ridiculous pace, it's probably going to him.
That's fairly accurate.If Makar is the best defenseman since Orr, does that make Fox the best player since Gretzky?
Fox's status is also hurt by the fact that we live in a highlight reel, low attention span world. People watch Makar use his skating ability to score a highlight reel goal and now, he's the greatest. It's far less exciting watching Fox use patience, deception and vision to outsmart everyone on the ice, including his own team mates.Its hard to compare Makar and Fox.
Makar's skillset, skating and shot are superior to almost all defenders in the game, including Fox (and many forwards). He a pure player, similar to how McDavid is compared to forwards.
What sets Fox apart from everyone is his uniqueness. He isnt the biggest, nor fastest, best skater or shooter. Its not about that with him. Its all intelligence, deception, stickhandling skills and an awareness level that is off the charts.
He has all of the similarities of a transcendent, generational talent like Gretzky (and Orr) in that he changes what a hockey player is thought to be and no one can adjust to it. Although im not sure the game will ever seen someone who emulates Fox's game or compares to him in the same style when all is said and done.
Does that make him "better"? Maybe. It depends on how you define what excellence is at his position. For me, in life in general, there are artists and influential people throughout history that leave their mark and the ones that are remembered the most are the ones that have a true individuality that is unlike anything this earth has seen.
To me thats Fox, and its why he is the best.
It's way more satisfying to watch Fox night after night though because of how subtle his style is.Fox's status is also hurt by the fact that we live in a highlight reel, low attention span world. People watch Makar use his skating ability to score a highlight reel goal and now, he's the greatest. It's far less exciting watching Fox use patience, deception and vision to outsmart everyone on the ice, including his own team mates.
I've always said that Fox should have 20-30 more points/year if his team mates could finish the dimes he drops on them.
As great as Leetch was, I think you're right.He keeps this level of play up and when its all said and done,he might end up the greatest defenseman this franchise has ever had.Yeah,I said it...
Agree. And its all the other little things he does, consistently on a nightly basis. Like batting pucks out of mid air and recovering on plays where he is seemingly beat, that most players would only do here and there.Fox's status is also hurt by the fact that we live in a highlight reel, low attention span world. People watch Makar use his skating ability to score a highlight reel goal and now, he's the greatest. It's far less exciting watching Fox use patience, deception and vision to outsmart everyone on the ice, including his own team mates.
I've always said that Fox should have 20-30 more points/year if his team mates could finish the dimes he drops on them.
I honestly didn't think we'd see someone as good as McDonagh for a long timeI never thought i would see someone better than Leetch on the blueline in a rangers jersey, but we now most likely are.
Its hard to compare Makar and Fox.
Makar's skillset, skating and shot are superior to almost all defenders in the game, including Fox (and many forwards). He a pure player, similar to how McDavid is compared to forwards.
What sets Fox apart from everyone is his uniqueness. He isnt the biggest, nor fastest, best skater or shooter. Its not about that with him. Its all intelligence, deception, stickhandling skills and an awareness level that is off the charts.
He has all of the similarities of a transcendent, generational talent like Gretzky (and Orr) in that he changes what a hockey player is thought to be and no one can adjust to it. Although im not sure the game will ever seen someone who emulates Fox's game or compares to him in the same style when all is said and done.
Does that make him "better"? Maybe. It depends on how you define what excellence is at his position. For me, in life in general, there are artists and influential people throughout history that leave their mark and the ones that are remembered the most are the ones that have a true individuality that is unlike anything this earth has seen.
To me thats Fox, and its why he is the best.
Today on Overdrive:Fox's status is also hurt by the fact that we live in a highlight reel, low attention span world. People watch Makar use his skating ability to score a highlight reel goal and now, he's the greatest. It's far less exciting watching Fox use patience, deception and vision to outsmart everyone on the ice, including his own team mates.
I've always said that Fox should have 20-30 more points/year if his team mates could finish the dimes he drops on them.
Can EK win the Norris if he ends up with a negative plus minus. Has a defenceman ever done that ?If EK continues his pace I don't think the playoff race really matters.
A defenseman hasn't broken 100 points in 30 years. Fox either needs to close that gap considerably or EK needs to tail off. Plus theres a chance that he isn't even a Shark after the deadline as there is some trade interest in him.
Can EK win the Norris if he ends up with a negative plus minus. Has a defenceman ever done that ?
especially on the PPOur finishing with Fox on the ice is dog ass. He should have 80 points.