JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 80,075
- 17,714
GyorgStill need a proper goalie
GyorgStill need a proper goalie
I wouldn’t bank on that we underestimate Trouba’s value, but I think everyone assumes that it’s on the very low side on a scale of what he can fetch.
It’s dependent on a lot of factors. He is basically a rental, one year left. We dealt both McD and Miller with more term left.
Whoever gets him will want to get an extension in place. Trouba has waited a long time to get to choice where to play the second half of his career. How many teams are he interested to sign with? 15? 5? 1-2?
I would bet good money on Karlsson resigning with SJ. Is Pieterangelo getting to July 1st next summer? Odds are that there will be a hole lot of nothing available. Trouba is just entering his prime. If he has good numbers next season — many players have really good contract seasons — what can he get? If he has the same type of contract year as Evander Kane or Matt Duchene and many like that have had, it’s not 7m per but probably closer to 9.5m per if I know NHL GMs right...
So like sure, if he is willing to resign at 7x7 with 25 different NHL teams, he would bring a really good return. But if it’s with 1-2 teams and/or only at 9-10m per it’s going to be less. And lately I think we have seen more and more players be pretty picky on whom to sign with. But we just don’t know all relevant factors to determine his value.
So I just realized we are in the Adam Fox thread, not the Rosterbuilding thread. Been a busy day. If anyone wants to continue this discussion, lets move it over there![]()
Also, why is no one talking about Trouba going to Detroit? That's the most logical destination
Believe what you want.
That's why I'm saying you sell high on him nowtrue but that value may never be higher than it is right now. if he does nothing next year at 21 its going to start to look bad. real bad real fast. to me his value is as high as it will ever be right now. you guys know I'm just not a believer in the kid.
No offense, but if the cost was Andersson for Trouba + 2nd, even I would be on board with that.
I think the reason many of you are okay with a Trouba trade is because you are vastly undervaluing what he would cost in a trade. Andersson doesn't get you Trouba, let alone adding a 2nd.
The ask from Winnipeg starts with Miller, Lundkvist or Kravtsov and that isn't unreasonable either, he is a legitimate top pairing defenseman. They also probably want their 1st back or our 1st next year. Again, not completely unreasonable asks.
If we make a trade with Winnipeg, you are looking at a range of Winnipeg 1st + Lundkvist + Andersson to NYR 2020 1st + Kravtsov/Miller + Pionk. Again, you all have said it, he is a legitimate top pairing guy. They aren't cheap.
I think his absolute ceiling is a Top pairing, #2 defenseman. The offense will be there but the question is if he can play well enough defensively to be considered a top pair dman.So I after all the talk about Fox in previous roster building threads, what is his absolute ceiling? What do we think is likely in 2-3 years?
Well, after wavering back and forth all year, I’ve come out on the no to Panarin side. As for Trouba, his new deal wouldn’t kick in until next year (also, I suspect Skjei would be the main piece going back).if they add a trouba and panarin its close no?
Some very interesting quotes in this article about Adam Fox
Analysis, Reaction to Rangers' Trade for Fox - MSGNetworks.com
I see no reason to move staal. he can finish his contract right in time for Kandre to come in. I don't consider it an issue
shatty I think has more value around the league than people realize. righty dman only 2 years left on contract. runs a pp. that's attractive to teams. we may not get much but I think there's value there.
Smith while overpaid can be your 12th forward AND your 7th dman. he's fine too.
no one picks the panthers over the Rangers if both teams want a guy. No one. guys don't want to play in empty buildings. I know some think its a myth but original 6 playing for a world class organization that treats their players like royalty every one wants to play for the Rangers. very few don't. I'd be shocked if he picked the panthers over the rangers unless the difference in money is stupid. not just the same I mean stupid.
If he's willing to forgo $4.5 million, he doesn't have to play forward. I'm betting he'll play forward.Don’t think anyone is doing us a favor with Shatty. Brooks reported that we couldn’t find a take at 50% retained unless we ourselves took a bad contract back. Watch Gorton buy-him out because we can’t deal him at 50% only to have someone sign him for 4m per the next day...
Also, I am not sure how feasible it is to have Smith as a forward. Was it a short term agreement last season? If he don’t want to play there, you can’t make him.
RH offensive D who grew up rooting for the Rangers.
I can't think of an instance of that ever going wrong.
If he turns into Prime Shattenkirk, I would be over the moon.If Fox turns into Shattenkirk, it was a great trade. Fox is 21. Shattenkirk in his 20s was great
If he turns into Prime Shattenkirk, I would be over the moon.
But that doesn't sound like the Rangers. Shattenkirk tearing his knee off in camp sounds like the Rangers.
Some very interesting quotes in this article about Adam Fox
Analysis, Reaction to Rangers' Trade for Fox - MSGNetworks.com
Hey, you got credit this time. Moving up in the world![]()
I think now is the time to be aggressive on Trouba
It seems like I'm in the minority here, but I don't even want Trouba for whatever he gets paid as a UFA, much less while also trading away a host of assets for him.
Something about him and the contract that he'll be getting just reminds me of the fat opulence that the Dark Ages reeked of.
Some very interesting quotes in this article about Adam Fox
Analysis, Reaction to Rangers' Trade for Fox - MSGNetworks.com