Raspewtin
Stay at home defenseman hater
- May 30, 2013
- 43,641
- 20,071
How?
Played well, but that penslty will scratch him
Played well, but that penslty will scratch him
-38% possession player, bad penalty
-playing well
Pick one
7 CA when the team got destroyed is pretty good in my mind.
Girardi had thirty-eight
Clendening just isn't that good. Holden is the 3rd best D-man on this team
Clendening just isn't that good. Holden is the 3rd best D-man on this team
Clendening just isn't that good. Holden is the 3rd best D-man on this team
And yet he still blows Dan Girardi, Kevin Klein, and Nick Holden out of the water.
Just because those guys suck doesn't mean Clendening doesn't as well. The right side is an abomination personnel wise and needs to be addressed sooner or later. But this "anyone but..." mentality continues to be equal parts stupid and annoying when there is clearly no answer on the current roster
The Rangers are not an NHL team when he's on the ice, during which they concede 60% of the shots.
That's odd. He's +11. I would really think that if it makes us not an NHL team, his +/- would be bad, not good. In fact, the last full season that he wasn't a + was 09/10.
So, in what way is it not hyperbole to say that we aren't an NHL team when he's on the ice? We seem to do a lot better than our NHL opponents. I don't give a damn if we concede 60% of shots as long as we are healthily in the plus column.
Now, you might believe that this is a fluke season. Just like all his other seasons. I remember being told just how irrelevant +/- is when I used to stand up for Malik, so maybe you don't think stats like what team score more is important.
Last year when Girardi didn't play we lost 7 of the 11 games.
No-one thinks Girardi is great, but we're third in the league, he is regularly a plus player. The massive problem of our team is not Dan Girardi (in so far as we have problems). An improvement could be made given he's on the top pair, that's for sure, but he does not ruin the team.
That's odd. He's +11. I would really think that if it makes us not an NHL team, his +/- would be bad, not good. In fact, the last full season that he wasn't a + was 09/10.
So, in what way is it not hyperbole to say that we aren't an NHL team when he's on the ice? We seem to do a lot better than our NHL opponents. I don't give a damn if we concede 60% of shots as long as we are healthily in the plus column.
Now, you might believe that this is a fluke season. Just like all his other seasons. I remember being told just how irrelevant +/- is when I used to stand up for Malik, so maybe you don't think stats like what team score more is important.
Last year when Girardi didn't play we lost 7 of the 11 games.
No-one thinks Girardi is great, but we're third in the league, he is regularly a plus player. The massive problem of our team is not Dan Girardi (in so far as we have problems). An improvement could be made given he's on the top pair, that's for sure, but he does not ruin the team.
And yet he still blows Dan Girardi, Kevin Klein, and Nick Holden out of the water.