This guy is going to be a bonafide stud. There is so much to love about his game.
How is Larkin 1C over Petterson???Kasper + Wallinder + Next available 1st Rounder
for
Pettersson w/out an extension.
I don't know why people wouldn't do this...I love kasper, I think Wallinder is going to be great, and that 1st would be almost useless with Pettersson's addition. With all that being said...
Rasmussen - Larkin - DBC
Berggren - Pettersson - Raymond
Soderblom - Danielson - Copp/Compher -->Mazur
To have this in 2 years or so? Are we seriously going to sit here and say that this is not a cup contending/deep playoff run top 9?? Then copp contract runs out and you put mazur there for Soderblom - Danielson - Mazur....come on guys, what in the world is truly wrong with this? They are all under 28!!!!! Larkin would literally be the oldest one lmao
For sure, I didn't love it at the time, I thought his upside was a hard-working 3rd liner in this league, but I am pleasantly surprised with his offensive instincts and smarts. I know it's still extremely early, but I think we'll have an absolute 2-way stud on our hands here.was neutral on the pick, but Sy looks like genius here.
because Larkin can play well against top line centers in the league and pettersson would get much more easy matchups at line 2 while completing an all swedish second line. Obviously.How is Larkin 1C over Petterson???
I would agree that Kasper's energy level that first game reminded me of Larkin's rookie year. However, I am not sure that energy will result in production.I would argue that Kaspers first game, with a broken kneecap, I did very much notice him buzzing around the ice, finishing his checks, I think he both created a scoring chance and generated a shot, and started jawing after the whistle.
So to your point, Kasper did pop for me the one time we saw him. Mazur, haven’t seen yet.
I would agree that Kasper's energy level that first game reminded me of Larkin's rookie year. However, I am not sure that energy will result in production.
Danielson's game screams control while still playing an up tempo game. He could easily play 2C. I would rank him ahead of Kasper. Certainly the season is premature, but this kids has surprised with his game and maturity.
Danielson was greedy on a 2 on 1 last night and shot into a block. I see it tooThere’s a big difference between Kasper and Danielson in play style despite both being similar in talent levels.
Kasper spent 3 years in Sweden which is VERY systems heavy. Kasper may not look as individually skilled but will be a terrific systems executor. I think that’s why he wasn’t a true standout in TC. He wasn’t selfish enough and it impacted potential production.
Nate Danielson played on a no system team and you notice his individual skill a lot more as a result. I think his game rounds off a bit the more he learns the system but like that he seems a bit more willing to be ‘the guy’ than Kasper does with the puck.
I think Kasper will eventually get this. Danielson very clearly has it now.
Danielson was greedy on a 2 on 1 last night and shot into a block. I see it too
I think the bolded is a wildly overlooked point too. You can look like you play fast and not actually accomplish much at all. Changing tempo to read and react at the pace of a faster-paced game than ever puts you at a real advantage of being a difference maker in the show.I would agree that Kasper's energy level that first game reminded me of Larkin's rookie year. However, I am not sure that energy will result in production.
Danielson's game screams control while still playing an up tempo game. He could easily play 2C. I would rank him ahead of Kasper. Certainly the season is premature, but this kids has surprised with his game and maturity.
He was greedy in that play, each instance can be dissected. He could have passed, instead of looked shot all the way and got blocked because the defense read it.I don’t think that’s greedy. I think it’s just him wanting to take a shot. Greedy is a guy that routinely doesn’t pass to take bad shots all the time.
I am not sure about a slam dunk for any player, but I agree that he looked well in control in Brandon against peers, with him playing this well amongst AHL'ers (Pens didn't have a lot of top 6 talent in the team they brought) he moved up. The big question was how he would do against men and it looks promising.I think the bolded is a wildly overlooked point too. You can look like you play fast and not actually accomplish much at all. Changing tempo to read and react at the pace of a faster-paced game than ever puts you at a real advantage of being a difference maker in the show.
His speed threat + slowing down and scanning around to pick soft spots around the ice to influence the play whether it be offensively or defensively is going to go far (e.g. His goal last night - broken play and he capitalized). That's a very underrated part about him as he's involved in the play and will help him lots as he learns more and more about the pace of the pro game.
To which is why I don't buy the middle-6 upside. He's a slam dunk top-6 C IMO, it's just a matter of how good he can get. Those who watched Brandon play last year got a pretty good feel for how he plays the game with quite literally zero relevant talent on his team.
Agreed after 1 preseason game his future is definitely set.This guy is going to be a bonafide stud. There is so much to love about his game.
When you're playing with unfamiliar linemates, shooting should be the default decision. If he decides to do that all of the time once he's on the roster, then it's an issue. He hasn't had much help on his WHL team, so it's understandable, and hopefully he'll learn to utilize his teammates better when he plays with better players.He was greedy in that play, each instance can be dissected. He could have passed, instead of looked shot all the way and got blocked because the defense read it.
That's where I'm at.I would agree that Kasper's energy level that first game reminded me of Larkin's rookie year. However, I am not sure that energy will result in production.
Danielson's game screams control while still playing an up tempo game. He could easily play 2C. I would rank him ahead of Kasper. Certainly the season is premature, but this kids has surprised with his game and maturity.
He also looked good in the prospect tourney and Red/White game. Certainly exceeded expectations so far.Agreed after 1 preseason game his future is definitely set.
He's going to be our top prospect by next off season. Looks like a no-doubt top 6 C at 18. His play with actual talent (such as it is on our team) shows that his production was severely hampered by his teammates. Definitely should have been in more top 5 talks than he was... he's like a young Larkin with an even more refined shot. Huge ceiling on this kid and I'm glad I was not hater.
The guy played well in the prospect tournament and in a preseason game against scrubs isn't "exceeding" expectations for the 9th overall pick.When you're playing with unfamiliar linemates, shooting should be the default decision. If he decides to do that all of the time once he's on the roster, then it's an issue. He hasn't had much help on his WHL team, so it's understandable, and hopefully he'll learn to utilize his teammates better when he plays with better players.
That's where I'm at.
I haven't liked Draper's second round picks, but I know better than to doubt the first pick. Kasper is also a first pick, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt even if I like Daniel-san better.
He also looked good in the prospect tourney and Red/White game. Certainly exceeded expectations so far.
We'll see how he does against legit NHL players.
He's playing better than Kasper who was picked #8OA, and the knock on Danielson was his offensive ability. He was labeled as "tough to play against", so yeah, he's exceeding my expectations.The guy played well in the prospect tournament and in a preseason game against scrubs isn't "exceeding" expectations for the 9th overall pick.
Maybe try to calm the hype a bit.