PGT: 9/21 North America vs Sweden - North America wins 4-3 in OT but Sweden advances

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Would it really matter though? Sweden won against both Finland and Russia, shouldn't that be enough to win against any of them in a head-to-head race? Or is it the goals that count even then?

Suppose T NA did beat Swedes in regulation, NA finishes ahead of Swedes because of H2H if Russia loses to Fins, But if Russia wins in regulation , NA still finishes ahead of Swedes on goal differential...

So T NA to a man should have known YESTERDAY that all they needed today was a win in regulation...

Swedes doubtless knew YESTERDAY that a regulation loss, potentially resulting in a three way tie could be death for them depending on what happens 2morrow, that is to say, depending on Russia's margin of victory...

Obviously, in a 3 way tie, H2H goes out the window, so again it would come down to goal differential, meaning one of Russia or Sweden ( but not T NA ) would be out

GOT IT?
 
That's not fair. Lidström struggled to perform well in his first outings for the national team too.

Maybe it's not fair but OEL has played 2 whc's and one olympic tournament before this one. I actually thought he was kinda good today.
 
Karlsson is such a beauty to watch, not many d in sweden was good , but Karlsson is complete dominate. Easily the best dmen in the world. He is on a complete different level then the rest.

As I understand Edmonton needs another RD, would be fun seeing Karlsson and McDavid. Maybe can trade Larsson for Karlsson
 
sigh, can you guys stop saying this? It's false. Had North America pulled their goalie and given up a goal then would be in almost the exactly same situation as now. If Finland won tomorrow by say 2, then it's a 3 way tie at 1-2, 2 points. It goes to goal difference and North America wins the goal difference. The only way North America doesn't win that goal difference was if Finland won by 7.

There was almost no risk in losing, the only 2 winning scenarios they have now that they wouldn't have had if they lost in regulation was if Finland wins in OT, or if Finland wins by 7 or more.

I see your point so I was wrong about them being eliminated today, but it would have still meant that Russia would only need 1 point from an OTL in order to advance. At least now, Russia needs to win. So it's not as simple as saying that it would go to a three way tie breaker. Even with the tie breaker, losing in regulation would give NA a +2 goal differential total, so Russia would advance just by getting +2 goal win against Finland, which isn't a stretch.

And again, pulling the goalie is a low percentage play, even on a team as loaded as NA in offensive skill. I get the logic of forcing a regulation win, but I'm not sure it's worth the downside of losing in reg.
 
Maybe it's not fair but OEL has played 2 whc's and one olympic tournament before this one.

Hes a good 2 way defender but he is NOT anywhere close to being the GOD the Arizona fans think he is.

I thinks its kind of endearing for a fanbase to love their guy but they take the prize for homer worship of any player in the league by their own fans.
 
A coach who knows his teams needs to win in regulation to advance for sure likely relays this to his players and tries to go basically all out to get that regulation win since it was far far more beneficial than an OT win. They were clearly fine going to OT, no urgency at the end and Mackinnon said he thought they advanced with the OT win. They need to know ahead of time exactly what they need. That's pretty inexcusable. A bunch of us on here figured it out then if a staff of 10 people can't figure it out then they need to hire an 11th who knows how to figure these things out.

Hard to believe ,,, I mean they can't have missed that Russia beat them so thats a win for them and a loss for us. duh
 
Pretty unfortunate that McLellan never bothered to check the rules before the game. Because otherwise he would of realized that they would of been in an identical situation had they lost this game by 1 or 2 goals, and instead would have pulled the goalie to try to win in regulation.
How is getting to OT and going to 3 or 4pts an identical situation to losing in regulation and staying at 2pts?

NA loses in regulation = stay at 2pts and need Finland to win in regulation tomorrow
NA loses in OT = 3pts. Will advance unless Russia picks up a point tomorrow
NA wins in OT = 4pts. Will advance unless Russia wins tomorrow

North America winning in regulation would have been ideal, obviously. What ended up happening was the second best case and makes Russia's next game a must-win.
 
Last edited:
Hes a good 2 way defender but he is NOT anywhere close to being the GOD the Arizona fans think he is.

I thinks its kind of endearing for a fanbase to love their guy but they take the prize for homer worship of any player in the league by their own fans.

a top 10 D is a god, especially for that team

He's the equivalent of McDavid with how much they defer the puck to him
 
Lundqvist stole the game in the 2nd. Point blank opportunities and he stoned them. Happens.. Gibson was really scarey shakey in the first
 
How is getting to OT and going to 3 or 4pts an identical situation to losing in regulation and staying at 2pts?

NA loses in regulation = stay at 2pts and need Finland to win in regulation tomorrow
NA loses in OT = 3pts. Will advance unless Russia picks up a point tomorrow

NA wins in OT = 4pts. Will advance unless Russia wins tomorrow

Those bolded are the incidental situation just worded differently. The 3rd scenario(what happened) is slightly better given they can afford FIN to win in OT as well, but that scenario is probably 10% at best. Worth the risk to go hard try to win the game in regulation to lock the spot up IMO.
 
Does anybody know if the players are getting paid for this?

Do they get revenue sharing or jersey sales revenue?

The part that goes to the NHL is hockey-related revenue so it's split 50-50 between the players and the owners. That should include ticket sales, jersey sales, broadcast $$, etc. I'm pretty sure that's why the NHLPA agreed to the tournament. I don't know what the agreement with the European federations, clubs etc. who are participating or the IIHF is, though. Some of the money is probably going to them but I don't know anything about that.
 
OEL never manages to do what he does in the NHL, on the national team. Seems like he loses all confidence as soon as he puts on the jersey.

Hedman was the worst D today though. Not sure if he's playing through an injury after Komarov going after his knees, but something didn't look right in the way he skated and moved.
 
How is getting to OT and going to 3 or 4pts an identical situation to losing in regulation and staying at 2pts?

NA loses in regulation = stay at 2pts and need Finland to win in regulation tomorrow
NA loses in OT = 3pts. Will advance unless Russia picks up a point tomorrow
NA wins in OT = 4pts. Will advance unless Russia wins tomorrow

The only difference is that Finland would have needed to win in regulation instead of OT tomorrow... and Finland would of actually been motivated by a slim chance at advancing had we lost in regulation (they would of needed to beat Russia by about 6 goals but it would still be a chance).
 
lol, people arguing over Karlsson in a mickey mouse pre-season tournament :naughty:

cute seeing the haters coming out of the woodwork for this one. especially when he was easily the best defenseman out there tonight (2 A's, +1 on the losing team).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad