Chimpradamus
Registered User
That's not fair. Lidström struggled to perform well in his first outings for the national team too.OEL has been, is and will continue to be the most over rated 'elite dman' in the league.
That's not fair. Lidström struggled to perform well in his first outings for the national team too.OEL has been, is and will continue to be the most over rated 'elite dman' in the league.
OEL has been, is and will continue to be the most over rated 'elite dman' in the league.
Would it really matter though? Sweden won against both Finland and Russia, shouldn't that be enough to win against any of them in a head-to-head race? Or is it the goals that count even then?
Team NA played Russia a day after their game with Finland
Yes they did. But Russia didn't get a day off after the Sweden game either.
MacKinnon took Lundqvist to school in Overtime, when the game was on the line.
What. A. Player.
That's not fair. Lidström struggled to perform well in his first outings for the national team too.
sigh, can you guys stop saying this? It's false. Had North America pulled their goalie and given up a goal then would be in almost the exactly same situation as now. If Finland won tomorrow by say 2, then it's a 3 way tie at 1-2, 2 points. It goes to goal difference and North America wins the goal difference. The only way North America doesn't win that goal difference was if Finland won by 7.
There was almost no risk in losing, the only 2 winning scenarios they have now that they wouldn't have had if they lost in regulation was if Finland wins in OT, or if Finland wins by 7 or more.
MacK one on one with a goalie is pretty sick
Maybe it's not fair but OEL has played 2 whc's and one olympic tournament before this one.
A coach who knows his teams needs to win in regulation to advance for sure likely relays this to his players and tries to go basically all out to get that regulation win since it was far far more beneficial than an OT win. They were clearly fine going to OT, no urgency at the end and Mackinnon said he thought they advanced with the OT win. They need to know ahead of time exactly what they need. That's pretty inexcusable. A bunch of us on here figured it out then if a staff of 10 people can't figure it out then they need to hire an 11th who knows how to figure these things out.
How is getting to OT and going to 3 or 4pts an identical situation to losing in regulation and staying at 2pts?Pretty unfortunate that McLellan never bothered to check the rules before the game. Because otherwise he would of realized that they would of been in an identical situation had they lost this game by 1 or 2 goals, and instead would have pulled the goalie to try to win in regulation.
Hes a good 2 way defender but he is NOT anywhere close to being the GOD the Arizona fans think he is.
I thinks its kind of endearing for a fanbase to love their guy but they take the prize for homer worship of any player in the league by their own fans.
How is getting to OT and going to 3 or 4pts an identical situation to losing in regulation and staying at 2pts?
NA loses in regulation = stay at 2pts and need Finland to win in regulation tomorrow
NA loses in OT = 3pts. Will advance unless Russia picks up a point tomorrow
NA wins in OT = 4pts. Will advance unless Russia wins tomorrow
And Lundqvist outplayed Team NA when it mattered the most.
Does anybody know if the players are getting paid for this?
Do they get revenue sharing or jersey sales revenue?
The Sedins and Karlsson cost Sweden the game, terrible effort.
How is getting to OT and going to 3 or 4pts an identical situation to losing in regulation and staying at 2pts?
NA loses in regulation = stay at 2pts and need Finland to win in regulation tomorrow
NA loses in OT = 3pts. Will advance unless Russia picks up a point tomorrow
NA wins in OT = 4pts. Will advance unless Russia wins tomorrow