The Rage Kage
Registered User
- Apr 21, 2014
- 6,257
- 5,118
My ignore list has grown significantly after this game how anyone can blame Giroux for that loss is unbelievable.
The amount of holding and interference that is being let go in games nowadays if ****ing staggering. Detroit may be the biggest perpetrator of that.
Aren't you the guy who was blasting Giroux last night?
I love getlaf and Perry or Seguin and Benn and even Crosby and Malkin. G isn't even close to these guys except in points. G can't do things 1 on 1 to create for his wingers. he never makes nice plays except the odd time 5 on 5 and ghost and Sanheim or Provy won't help that either. These top players are weak and need help.You have no concept of good/bad/elite or anything else that relates to judging a hockey players value. The players you like and the players you hate prove this.
This all the way. he's ok but we need a top line elite in all aspects Center so he can go down a line.There is an alarming amount of people on here that either lack critical reading skills or put specific players on a pedestal and can't handle a little bit of critisicm of said player.
Not too sure which one you fall into but my post specifically said Giroux is not the main issue.
That said, it is a FACT that the guy hasn't had a meaningful impact in big games this yr. Every single game that has a GDT filled with you all inquiring how it's a "must win" and "we need to show up" he's been invisible.
2nd Pitt game in Philly = Nope
3rd Pitt game in Pitt= Nope
Last Night= Nope
Three huge games where if you don't win, you'd like your star captain to stand out as a positive and I can't really think of one.
Giroux is great. Giroux is the best player on this team. But he gets paid and hyped like a big impact player and in recent yrs he just hasn't been when we need him to be.
How in the world is that blasting?
On a pp and stopped playing. If there was a penalty it would have been called when they got the puck back but don't stop playing.The ice condition seemed horrible last night, pucks were bouncing around like crazy. Not going to blame that for losing, just an observation. That being said, Voracek man.... where are you??? He has been frustrating me so much lately, never makes the easy pass and is set on holding onto the puck for too long and then forcing a play when he has no options causing a turnover.
Noticed a lot of flopping around too yesterday, especially with G. Love him to death, but he needs to tone down on the embellishment, it's bothersome.
This all the way. he's ok but we need a top line elite in all aspects Center so he can go down a line.
I love getlaf and Perry or Seguin and Benn and even Crosby and Malkin. G isn't even close to these guys except in points. G can't do things 1 on 1 to create for his wingers. he never makes nice plays except the odd time 5 on 5 and ghost and Sanheim or Provy won't help that either. These top players are weak and need help.
Voracek is not playing well, no question, but the amount of blame being piled on him is pretty over the top. If this was a more complete team he wouldn't be squeezing the stick and the team could continue to function when he's in a rut.
People have some crazy expectations of top players sometimes. Giroux and Voracek might not be quite as good as Benn or Crosby or Ovechkin, but so what? They are still net positive players so piling on them is silly.
I love getlaf and Perry or Seguin and Benn and even Crosby and Malkin. G isn't even close to these guys except in points. G can't do things 1 on 1 to create for his wingers. he never makes nice plays except the odd time 5 on 5 and ghost and Sanheim or Provy won't help that either. These top players are weak and need help.
Yes! While I love Simmonds and Schenn, nobody is mistaking that for a top line in the NHL even with Giroux centering it. The only way we have a truly to flight line is for Voracek to return to form and play with Giroux.
Funny you mention the guys that are elite that HAVE ELITE PLAYERS HELPING THEM. Schenn and Simmonds, while proven to be very good, are simply not at that level. Give Giroux anyone of those players named with him and he arguably leads the league in points.
I know. Why don't we add another thousand posts stating the obvious how Manning is over his head and should be returned to the AHL? Then we can give ourselves backrubs as we sit back in amazement of our superior hockey analysis compared to those that offer a different opinion.
I know. Why don't we add another thousand posts stating the obvious how Manning is over his head and should be returned to the AHL? Then we can give ourselves backrubs as we sit back in amazement of our superior hockey analysis compared to those that offer a different opinion.
I love getlaf and Perry or Seguin and Benn and even Crosby and Malkin. G isn't even close to these guys except in points. G can't do things 1 on 1 to create for his wingers. he never makes nice plays except the odd time 5 on 5 and ghost and Sanheim or Provy won't help that either. These top players are weak and need help.
I know. Why don't we add another thousand posts stating the obvious how Manning is over his head and should be returned to the AHL? Then we can give ourselves backrubs as we sit back in amazement of our superior hockey analysis compared to those that offer a different opinion.
At least that is a correct hockey analysis. Manning is indeed over his head. Giroux, however, is elite and the furthest thing from being a problem; he's our most important player, easily. I don't see why your flagrantly incorrect statements should be left to stand unaddressed, nor do I understand why you think they should be let be as if they are remotely credible or backed up by any sort of analysis of reality, be it the eye test or stats. Nor do I understand this martyr complex you have on display here.
You say "Poor me! I can't criticize Giroux!" That's false. What it really is, is "Poor me! I can't criticize Giroux baselessly with nothing to back up my assertions!" You seem to think the former is going on, when in reality it's the latter.
At least that is a correct hockey analysis. Manning is indeed over his head. Giroux, however, is elite and the furthest thing from being a problem; he's our most important player, easily. I don't see why your flagrantly incorrect statements should be left to stand unaddressed, nor do I understand why you think they should be let be as if they are remotely credible or backed up by any sort of analysis of reality, be it the eye test or stats. Nor do I understand this martyr complex you have on display here.
You say "Poor me! I can't criticize Giroux!" That's false. What it really is, is "Poor me! I can't criticize Giroux baselessly with nothing to back up my assertions!" You seem to think the former is going on, when in reality it's the latter.
You're the person posting about Manning in this thread.
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/search.php?searchid=38118117
You clearly don't pay any attention when this team plays. Literally everything you said wildly inaccurate.
But at least you tried.
I'd rather see 1000 of those posts than one that says stuff as stupid as what you've posted in this thread.
And when the "different opinions" are as incorrect and ignorant as yours they deserve to be mocked.