GDT: #69 - 03/16/14 | San Jose Sharks @ New York Rangers | 4:00 - MSG

[Kane One]

That looked pretty conclusive, the Rangers won maybe 1 of these all year.

We have won more than one. People only remember reviews when it goes against us.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

The team this year just has no luck at all.

 

[ThisYearsModel]

No conclusive evidence? LOL!

 

[MTrangers]

Every. Time.

 

[Hi ImHFNYR]

We saw the puck was definitely in the net. But we're going to say it wasn't for no reason really

 

[Fataldogg]

That looked pretty conclusive, the Rangers won maybe 1 of these all year.

This is how I feel. It's almost disheartening to know you won't get the call. I don't know how many teams have had as much bad luck as us.

We might be 1-15 with Toronto calls this season?

War room is a joke.

 

[ajdj10]

This is a **** joke.
How can they mess up calls against us like this all the time?

 

[AlternateSideParking]

Big save on the tip. Remember that one.

 

[charlie460]

Correct call. Nothing conclusive.

I'm sorry, but what the **** are you talking about? Are you being sarcastic?

 

[Holocene]

Correct call. Nothing conclusive.

Except for the puck being in the net past the line.

 

[Riverdale]

Hahahahahaha

I hate everything.

 

[AHB*]

They need to put a chip in the puck and the goalposts. That´s a ****** joke. Everybody with a brain knows that puck was in the net

I never understood why there aren't cameras IN the nets for every game. I mean they do it here and there and I believe in the playoffs, but why not just for every game?

 

[Blueshirt Believer]

It was the right call. You can't see the puck even if its obvious that the puck went over the line. You have to see the puck.

 

[Samuel Culper III]

No conclusive evidence that is crossed the line? Couldn't come up with a more convincing lie? That was very conclusive. It 100% crossed the line. If you're going to screw us, just use the intent to blow the whistle BS so that it's at least less obvious that you're screwing us. What part of that wasn't conclusive? Not that I'm at all surprised. I just figured they'd use a different excuse.

 

[NewLife]

Hahah really? No evidence, are all people blind in Toronto?

 

[I Am Chariot]

Toronto obviously biased vs the NY Rangers... how else do you explain such a blatant bull **** call

Tell us the whistle blew....aye ok

but no conclusive goal? nonsense

 

[The Pope*]

I have not seen so many calls on video go against one team ....I really can't remember one call that went our way!

 

[Hire Sather]

Until I saw that blown up replay I would've agreed with the call

thats clearly a goal

that is a freakin joke

 

[GetAGoodFeeling]

Man, I give up. Rangers Suck

 

[nevesis]

You know what? **** that call…how about we score a ****ing goal that utilizes some skill instead of luck? Give me those any day of the week.

 

[magnkarl]

Calm down guys, we never get these calls. We have to rely on our good goals.

 

[MysticLeviathan]

Now why the **** isn't there a goal cam there? That's what goal cams are for! They should have a goal cam for every single game, period.

 

[frozenrubber]

Even though we can extrapolate that the puck was over the line, Toronto was correct, there isn't CLEAR visual proof of the puck over the line (w/ the line and puck in clear vision).

Until there is puck sensor technology, Toronto's hands are tied.

 

[Megustaelhockey]

Hi, everyone. Please do not attempt to circumvent the profanity filter. Just type the bad word and let the ****s do their work. Thanks.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

It's one of those "didn't see the puck cross the line" probably. We've had that go for us before BUT that should really change. Seriously. Some common sense should be included.