GDT: #69 - 03/16/14 | San Jose Sharks @ New York Rangers | 4:00 - MSG

[The Gloaming]

Where was the goal cam?

 

[I Am Chariot]

Show me the puck over the line.

It had no where else to go...its over the line.

 

[Blueshirt Believer]

It's physically impossible for it to not have crossed the line.

#ToronnaPhysics

It doesn't matter. It can't be based on an assumption. They have to have visual confirmation on the puck itself.

It was the right call.

 

[Samuel Culper III]

You know what? **** that call…how about we score a ****ing goal that utilizes some skill instead of luck? Give me those any day of the week.

Absolutely. But it's still amusing to me that they actually said there wasn't conclusive evidence. If we don't score, we absolutely cannot point to that review and blame our loss on that. We need to put a puck in the net without a lucky call and actually win this game, but sheesh, I just figured they could come up with a better crock of bull than "not conclusive".

 

[Un Prophete]

Just another example of the absurdity of the technocratic age.

 

[Kane One]

Show me a scenario where the puck can be behind the post and not over the line.

I don't have to. You're the one who should provide proof to overturn the call on the ice. The onus is on you, not me.

 

[Hi ImHFNYR]

I almost feel bad for the refs I'm sure a lot of people at MSg are forgetting it's Toronto

 

[RM7]

Why do we need conslusive sight of the puck in the net? The puck is black. The puck is not invisible. You could not see the BLACK puck outside of the goal. Therefore, you can conclusively determine that the puck was inside the goal.

 

[Hunter Gathers]

Owned.

I mean, it's physically impossible. I don't see how that's not understood.

 

[AlternateSideParking]

Nash my goodness.

San jose collapses all 5 below the dots. Very frustrating.

Not a bad 2nd half to that period.

 

[AHB*]

See. that's what I am talking about LOL

There are morons in every facet of life. If you haven't learned that by now, then I don't know what to tell you. The internet has a higher majority of them. You always have to sift through crap, whether it's a hockey forum, or articles on news/politics/finance, etc.

Get over it. And go preach elsewhere.

 

[I Am Chariot]

Where was the goal cam?

yes, where is the aerial back view

 

[egelband]

what is the purpose of replay if not to 'get it right'?

 

[Hunter Gathers]

I don't have to. You're the one who should provide proof to overturn the call on the ice. The onus is on you, not me.

I did prove it. It's physically impossible for the puck to be behind the post and not over the line.

End of story.

 

[sark76]

Unreal.....I'm Stunned.

 

[Idlerlee]

Hows the midget line doing ?

 

[LORENZO]

What a joke.

 

[nevesis]

“@DaveLozo: No conclusive proof of a goal except for the conclusive proof of the goal."

https://vine.co/v/MhmP17ixT2U

 

[Kakko]

I don't have to. You're the one who should provide proof to overturn the call on the ice. The onus is on you, not me.

The puck slid behind the post. That's the goal.

Niemi blocked the camera's view, but that doesn't change the puck being in the net.

 

[Chimpradamus]

And now the refs are babysitters for the San Jose bench. Drop the puck or give them a penalty for delay of game. What you don't do is skate over and ask if they want another player on the ice.

This is beyond ridiculous. How can they screw this up? Penalize them, don't help them.

 

[BearishRiggs]

If they want to call off the goal because the ref had the intent to blow the whistle before the puck crossed the line, whatever. **** it. That call is bs and we know it but it isn't the first time they've done it this season.

But to say there was NO conclusive evidence the puck crossed the goal line? **** right off.

 

[I Am Chariot]

what is the purpose of replay if not to 'get it right'?

wheres the other cam angle....?

 

[Kane One]

I did prove it. It's physically impossible for the puck to be behind the post and not over the line.

End of story.

Sorry, but that's not proof. Just because it looks over the line because it was behind the post doesn't mean it's behind the line. Just like an overhead camera of the goal line, it's possible it's an illusion.

 

[magnkarl]

The puck escaped into the bermuda triangle, obvs.

 

[Hunter Gathers]

And now the refs are babysitters for the San Jose bench. Drop the puck or give them a penalty for delay of game. What you don't do is skate over and ask if they want another player on the ice.

This is beyond ridiculous. How can they screw this up? Penalize them, don't help them.

Absolutely. This is disgusting reffing.