Not meaning any disrespect to Kelly, but his biggest contribution to the Sens was lending Alfie his skates.
Minus 1 to credibility
Plus 1 to entertainment value
Not meaning any disrespect to Kelly, but his biggest contribution to the Sens was lending Alfie his skates.
Minus 1 to credibility
Plus 1 to entertainment value
Who is to say Bowers was a bad pick? They used it to acquire Duchene so Col must have seen something in him to want him & he was ranked as a late 1st rder right around where Ottawa picked him.Bowers is 4 months older and had the same season. Should we be expecting him to become a great player like tkachuk? lol. this was a bad pick. I don't understand scouts love with size and character.it's high end skill that wins games not character. he also got overrated because of his name.
Detroit also took Anthony Mantha after Ottawa selected Lazar were you upset about that too? I was.
So we will be trading Tkachuk to Detroit!?
Hey now, those skates changed Alfie's career path and led to some our best years! Also, that wasn't meant to be knock on Battleship Kelly
I was mad about that as well and was told i am not a scout and to shut my mouth.Detroit also took Anthony Mantha after Ottawa selected Lazar were you upset about that too? I was.
Who is to say Bowers was a bad pick? They used it to acquire Duchene so Col must have seen something in him to want him & he was ranked as a late 1st rder right around where Ottawa picked him.
Tkachuk has skill, every bio on him says so which is another reason he was ranked so high. If all he had was character & size he would have been much lower in the rankings. Just because they didn't pick the guy you wanted doesn't mean Tkachuk won't be a productive player for Ottawa. Sour grapes is all it is.
Tired of reading posts like this when it's clear on every scouting report & every article that you read about him that Tkachuk has a high skill set that people seem to want to ignore as well as having the intangibles. Even the guru of hockey around here Bobby Mac says so. Isn't that better to be a complete well rounded hockey player & not just known as a one dimensional skilled player? Hoffman was a one dimensional goal scoring sniper & people wanted him moved because he sucked defensively before the nonsense was reported.Sens brass needs to realize size and toughness matter less and less in the new NHL. Tired of seeing us waste 1st round picks.
Actually almost everybody is denying that Tkachuk is skilled & that he was drafted for character, name recognition, size & toughness. Look I agree that he probably won't put up the amount of pts that Zadina could, that's possible. Where I disagree with you is that what Tkachuk brings to the table could very well help the other players on his line be better than they would be without him. It doesn't matter if he isn't the best player on his line, it would be a great line if that were the case, it's more important that he helps the players on his line be better than they would be without him. This is still a team game & not about individuals, Tkachuk is the kind of player that makes everyone around him play better & bigger.No one is denying that Tkachuk isn't skilled. It's just that there are different tiers of skill. Tkachuk isn't of the skill level to be the driver on his line. His game is best suited if he was ideally the third best player on his line. Where he can make space and wreck chaos without slowing his linemates down. He is smart, skilled, complimentary and diverse enough that he could play with any play style.
So I love Tkachuk as a piece, he is the type of player you need to insulate your stars with.
But with the 4th overall pick you try to get a star not a Tkachuk.
Any line where Tkachuk is the best offensive player isn't going to be a line that can score consistently.
But really who cares if you mad, you are not the scout, you are just a fan, you're not in charge of scouting? why are you mad all the time bro?I was mad about that as well and was told i am not a scout and to shut my mouth.
How do you know Stone's role in the dressing room, motivating others, etc.Hoffman - 0.67ppg 0.31gpg
Stone - 0.81ppg 0.31gpg
Stone is the better offensive player, it's not his intangibles, his offense is better along with every other part of his game. He makes everyone better because of his I.Q and offensive ability, not his character and intangibles.
Who is claiming to? He said Stone is a good offensive player because of his skills and hockey IQ.How do you know Stone's role in the dressing room, motivating others, etc.
Hoffman - 0.67ppg 0.31gpg
Stone - 0.81ppg 0.31gpg
Stone is the better offensive player, it's not his intangibles, his offense is better along with every other part of his game. He makes everyone better because of his I.Q and offensive ability, not his character and intangibles.
I'd be surprised if Brady played in the NHL next yr, not saying it's not possible I just think it might be better for him to either go back to college to play or play a yr with the London Knights to further along his development.Interesting to see if he’s in the NHL next season. Does he put up more points than Mathew?
Man, I hope they can convince him to go to London. It'd be really fun to see him play with Formenton and get used to the grind of a long season.NHL Scout from a Western Conference team said the following about Tkachuk:
Scouting 2018 NHL draft prospect Brady Tkachuk
I'd like to see him in London too, though it would probably exaggerate the comparisson to Mathew, and people will contrast their respective seasons which would be a bit of apples and oranges with Brady a year older, and Mathew likely having higher talent linemates.Man, I hope they can convince him to go to London. It'd be really fun to see him play with Formenton and get used to the grind of a long season.