Rzombo4 prez
Registered User
- May 17, 2012
- 6,286
- 3,095
Honestly, we have so many defensemen in the organization that we could afford to target someone in this mold, especially after taking ASP in the first. The opportunity cost discussion needs to focus on the forwards we passed on, not the defensemen. For the sake of full disclosure, the forwards I personally wanted probably weren't "high upside, swing for the fences" prospects either.I have no issues with taking guys like Kasper or Danielson. Danielson in particular I think has a better offensive game than most give him credit for.
Even if we need more scoring on the wing.. I mean over the last month we have seen us trade for DeBrincat and a guy like Tarasenko be available for pretty cheap in free agency.
I have not had much of an issue at all with what Yzerman and Draper have done in the first, I am just not a fan of their strategy/philosophy with the picks in rounds 2-7 for the most part. With the amount of draft capital we have had I think we should have been taking a lot more big swings with those picks.
Oddly enough, if you took NDN where you took Cleveland and vice versa, no one would be complaining about him.