I appreciate what you are trying to do here, really I do. But even without the rumor hype, this is a poor deal for Boston. The entire goal for moving Ullmark in the first place was cap room to be used at 1c or to replace DeBrusk and get back into the first round. What we got was moving our best goaltender since Rask to a division rival for a playoff spot next season for 2 million in cap room, a boat anchor, and a 4th liner. Keeping Linus until the TDL and trying again OR at worst as an own rental next year would have pissed off the fans less and guaranteed a better record.
As of right now, is Boston a better team after this trade than before? No, they are not.
Is Ottawa? Yes, they are.
A lot of water has flowed through this thread since this, and others have said how I feel about it probably better than I can. I see the typical overreacting, mostly by those who were really hoping for a better return, but some defending it to the hilt. I lean toward thinking it isn't terrible, but yeah, not what I was hoping would happen. There may be more to come, and I hope there is, but if we end up with Korpi as Sway's backup at $3m, then that is fine. I don't think he's as terrible as some here have it. Then we got a 1st rounder back, and $2m in cap space, and Kastelic, whose short money was going to be used on someone like him anyway, and he has some potential to be a good player for us.
Linus held a lot of the cards, and if Sweeney had not moved him because he didn't like the deals on offer, the same people who are over the top raging about this would have been out of their minds that the Bruins were at ~$13m cap hit for goaltending: there went our money for a top 6 foward of some type.
Play with CapFriendly while you still can, and you'll see that the Bruins can add Lindholm or some other center, and a wing if JDB walks, and have enough left for a 3rd pair D man. Or any combination of those things. It just doesn't seem as tragically terrible as the vibe in here is leaning towards.