DET just paid a 2nd to dump a better player with a better contract. And Korpisalo has a 10 team NTCKorp still makes no sense and they haven’t come out and talked about the player similar to Martin Jones. I know we aren’t getting a first or anything of value for him but maybe there is a deal in the works of some kind.
Why would Lindholm not be here in 3 years? He's 29.
Who was Mr Nasty in the Panthers defense? Or the Oilers?
You don't think Kastelic is a Mr. Nasty add to the bottom6?
I saw that too and was alarmed when I saw the trade.DET just paid a 2nd to dump a better player with a better contract. And Korpisalo has a 10 team NTC
But Detroit has to want to get Ullmark as a return. Seems like they are opening space for a different reason.I saw that too and was alarmed when I saw the trade.
Walman is a top 4 dee and was not making a great deal of money.
I would have rather traded for him and a second rd pick for LU, vs the Sens deal.
The AAV may not be far off but I think Stephenson will be looking at a term of 4 years. GMs are becoming more and more reluctant to hand out big term, we saw it last summer as well. He's not an elite player I don't think 6-7 years is a realistic demand from him.
Why would Lindholm not be here in 3 years? He's 29.
Who was Mr Nasty in the Panthers defense? Or the Oilers?
You don't think Kastelic is a Mr. Nasty add to the bottom6?
At this point that is just pure speculation. I don't believe that will be the case, but maybe NHL GM's suddenly got a lot smarter. He will certainly have longer offers than 4 years.
I tend to believe that come July 1, the fog of war sets in and reason flies out the window, as fan bases see big cap space numbers available for their team, and are demanding it gets spent
Not happening, unless we move out a player like HL.I'd be ok with Stephenson, as long as we add a high end winger like Guentzel or Reinhart.
What type of contract would you offer for a 29 year old center/ LW, who in 80 games played last season scored 9G, 38A, with a faceoff percentage of 50%? And where would you play him in the lineup?Stephenson and Domi and I'm a happy camper. Speedy, competitive, and both centers that are good at the dot. Cheaper alternative to Lindholm and allow the bruins the ability to find another scoring winger and/or D.
One time I would agree, but I think things are changing. We saw the reluctance last summer. See Bertuzzi, Tyler and his one-year deal in TO.
The Bruins extended a former MVP in Hall for 4 years.
And let's be honest, GMs don't care about fans demanding cap space spent. Now owners on the other hand, they can push a GM to do some foolish stuff.
Last year was a really cap constrained year, and Bertuzzi had better offers that were multi year (including from boston), and he didn't want to do that.
Sorry, I can find more about this. Must have been clickbait bs. I would assume they mean Maroon's rights, and even that doesn't make a lot of sense.A headline just flashed across my phone but I can't seem to get to the story. Says the Bruins "may have" just traded Maroon. Sorry for lack of details, I'm sure somebody else can come up with those - headed into a meeting unfortunately (always).
I think Lindholm is a long-term solution. I think he signs long-term and would be a top6 center for us for the duration.I don't see any of the guys mentioned being a long-term solution. When I say three years, I just mean he's a stopgap. They all are.
That's okay, as far as it goes. There isn't much Sweeney can do about that. The market is what it is.
That's why I was hoping they would get NJ's 10th overall.
I think Lindholm is a long-term solution. I think he signs long-term and would be a top6 center for us for the duration.
What do you think he is looking at; I think you are in the 4-year range what about money.The AAV may not be far off but I think Stephenson will be looking at a term of 4 years. GMs are becoming more and more reluctant to hand out big term, we saw it last summer as well. He's not an elite player I don't think 6-7 years is a realistic demand from him.
I agree as well.
When he was on the Flames top line with Tkachuk and Gaudreau, he was exceptional.
If he plays with Pasta or Marchand, we will be more than fine and he's proven to be an effective top 2 center
What do you think he is looking at; I think you are in the 4-year range what about money.
Right. AND Walman went to a team with nothing but money and time. No Cup aspirations in SJ. And only two years worth of contract to eat.DET just paid a 2nd to dump a better player with a better contract. And Korpisalo has a 10 team NTC
He had some good regular seasons...meh on regular seasons, what matters is the playoffs.What type of contract would you offer for a 29 year old center/ LW, who in 80 games played last season scored 9G, 38A, with a faceoff percentage of 50%? And where would you play him in the lineup?
Barring a trade, a home run draft pick, or a Poitras explosion, Boston won’t have a bonafide top tier 1C for a bit. That’s fine, we were fortunate to have 2 of them with Bergeron and Krecji for years. The all star names people see on next summer FA list will likely all sign with their existing teams or be traded for absolute hauls (Drai).I agree as well.
When he was on the Flames top line with Tkachuk and Gaudreau, he was exceptional.
If he plays with Pasta or Marchand, we will be more than fine and he's proven to be an effective top 2 center
I don't know... I watched him in the Vancouver series and last year with Calgary when we were rumored to be trying to trade for him. He's a pretty energetic player. He's also bigger and more physical than I thought. He averages around 100 hits and 50 takeaways a season so he's certainly driving in terms of creating turnovers and transition.Lindholm needs play drivers on both wings to get the most out of him as he's a complimentary player.
Stamkos??But Detroit has to want to get Ullmark as a return. Seems like they are opening space for a different reason.