Mighty Makar
I hate this fu*ken team
- May 24, 2016
- 15,228
- 16,868
Henrique!Just thinking of righty’s… There’s Dumba but idk if he’s the right guy to pair with Byram on the 3rd pair.
Which guy?
Henrique!Just thinking of righty’s… There’s Dumba but idk if he’s the right guy to pair with Byram on the 3rd pair.
Which guy?
I completely understand that sentiment, but there's a lot that goes on behind the scenes that we don't know about as fans. There may be somebody for sale that hasn't leaked out publicly. Maybe there's some team out there that really loves Byram and is willing to give up a prize prospect to get him. That's why I said he needs to get creative. The traditional deadline rental pool is just dregs at this point.Who is the difference making 2C available at the deadline that would necessitate a RyJo move? Nelson would probably be my only answer, and there's no certainty he's even available.
I'm stuck on my G+1st for Ned+Petterson
I’d get very un stuck on that if I were you.I'm stuck on my G+1st for Ned+Petterson
We get out of G's NTC, bigger on the Left side and Pitts top PK defender, save about 1m on defense side of things.What? Why?
Girard is better than Petterson and we give a 1st for Nedeljkovic?
Jesus. Comeon man.
That would be cool.So EJ and Mittelstadt coming to Denver?
So EJ and Mittelstadt coming to Denver?
So EJ and Mittelstadt coming to Denver?
So EJ and Mittelstadt coming to Denver?
Tanev can't move the puck. Like at all. People gotta watch that guy nowadays. Puck is a tennis ball on that guy's stick. Gotta pray he is with Heiskanen.
"We want to send the right message after trading away our 1C, 1D, and 4th D, and will likely trade another top 4D."
"We want to send the right message after trading away our 1C, 1D, and 4th D, and will likely trade another top 4D."
"We're going to keep him until you decide to include in your offer the shitty prospect that you figured we wouldn't be interested in, so why bother bringing it up - but we are because our evaluations suck. Include that guy and we have a deal"Yeah that's a steaming pile of BS.
Code for : pay up DevilsYeah that's a steaming pile of BS.
Aspen!!!!Vacationing the Colorado River?
Tanev is a solid player. I would like to have him on the Avs but more of a depth d-man on 3rd pair, an upgrade over JJ. Stars getting him to be a top 4 guy and that doesn’t really scare meIf Tanev is so elite defensively, then why did Calgary trade him for a 2nd, a conditional 3rd if they make the Cup Finals, and what appears to be a purely defensive defenseman prospect, while retaining 50%, more than a week before the deadline?
If he was so elite, wouldn't they wait until the deadline to move him, since there would surely be a bunch of better offers than that?
Eric Francis, a CGY analyst for Sportsnet, said when interviewed this morning that the team was also afraid Tanev would get hurt and they would get nothing.If Tanev is so elite defensively, then why did Calgary trade him for a 2nd, a conditional 3rd if they make the Cup Finals, and what appears to be a purely defensive defenseman prospect, while retaining 50%, more than a week before the deadline?
If he was so elite, wouldn't they wait until the deadline to move him, since there would surely be a bunch of better offers than that?
I mean the stars D will look like this going into the playoffs I’d guess:The problem with that is, good teams in the playoffs will expose a D partner who can't move the puck.
If they play him with Heiskanen, that means he's matched against top lines, and the oppositions best players can then just dump the puck into the right corner and forecheck him hard, and get the puck back. In a 7 game series, they can figure out ways to exploit that.
You need both D men to be at least decent at moving the puck in the NHL now, especially in a top pair role.
We get out of G's NTC, bigger on the Left side and Pitts top PK defender, save about 1m on defense side of things.