eojsmada
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2022
- 3,476
- 6,052
This might be 4d chess too. “ ok Steve I’m whatever on Anaheim, but I’ll go there I’m definitely not going to Utah! “ etcYeah let's not piss everything away for Larkin. Both sides should be happy
I’ve thought for awhile Jimmy Murphy is a clown but yesterday I decided to go against my own instinct because he “reported” something I liked.
Now he’s backtracking which screams to me a guy that’s not actually connected at all but wants to be able to say he was right either way
Yeah I don’t think the need on right D is as crucial as some are making it out to be.I would be sorry to see Trouba go but I honestly really like our young Dmen and we don't need to spend ourselves silly trying to cling to anyone who isn't truly foundational. There will always be teams more desperate than us for these UFA Dmen, because our org does a better job of consistently churning out NHL defencemen.
Moore needs to play (on D), Luneau needs to play. Hinds can step right in, Solberg will not be far off. Teams who throw stupid money around on UFA's don't have all these other options in the hopper
Yeah I don’t think the need on right D is as crucial as some are making it out to be.
Ya I mean we’re obviously looking and in the market for a RHD…. I’m not going to lose sleep on trouba/carlson…. If PV didn’t bring lindholm back because of years, no shot he’s giving those guys years.Depends if the goal is to make the playoffs and contend or not. If the plan is to win games you're not doing a lot of that with a defense that includes 5 or even potentially 6 young D. None of whom is a great penalty killer. They have to find some kind of vet RD that can play 20 minutes a night and be a top PK guy at the very least.
And i worry that vet will just be gudas againDepends if the goal is to make the playoffs and contend or not. If the plan is to win games you're not doing a lot of that with a defense that includes 5 or even potentially 6 young D. None of whom is a great penalty killer. They have to find some kind of vet RD that can play 20 minutes a night and be a top PK guy at the very least.
And i worry that vet will just be gudas again
If I remember correctly, Bob Murray once said Murphy was full of s*** when he suggested he was considering trading Lindholm years before doing so.Is this guy legit?
Just because he comes back doesn’t mean you give him the C. It doesn’t even mean he’s a lineup regular.That would be even worse than a young D. Gudas clearly is not capable of playing top 4 minutes. He's not even capable of being a nightly guy on the 3rd pair. The captaincy is the main reason he has to go. You can't be forced to dress a subpar player on a nightly basis just because he's wearing the C.
Just because he comes back doesn’t mean you give him the C. It doesn’t even mean he’s a lineup regular.
+1000 gives the beeker another year to see which one of the kids step up and take the captaincy too.Stripping a guy of the captaincy is just needless controversy though. Why go through that for a player that isn't good enough at this stage of his career?
We will. Beeker cookingSo is it accurate the Trouba wants to test FA? That is...not ideal. We have to snag at least 1 Top 4 RHD
I just think these guys want long term, PV won’t do it at that age. Good on himMaybe he tests free agency to see what he's worth and still signs here? Hopefully he doesn't sign with San Jose to stay in California. I don't want the Trouba train in the division.
I'm so over this narrative. (Nothing personal, Robbie.) The time for waiting to see who steps up has passed because this is no longer a rebuild. We have a handful of captaincy-worthy players on the roster right now: Lacombe, Killer, Granny, Poehling, Terry...+1000 gives the beeker another year to see which one of the kids step up and take the captaincy too.