Speculation: - 2026-27 Trade/FA thread/Roster Thread - Waiting for the SCF to be over…. | Page 101 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: 2026-27 Trade/FA thread/Roster Thread - Waiting for the SCF to be over….

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
For us. I don't think that'd be great for Toronto unless it was Minty going. I think the Knies smoke is Buffalo with 4. There were already rumors of Chicago moving 4 for Knies.
@Webster has told us, that the beeker has told Solberg that he envisions Solberg becoming a very important piece for the ducks moving forward. I don’t think they have plans for him to become only our bottom pair lhd.Can hindz handle middle pair minutes next season? Was the beeker turned off by minty having his agent go out in public “ play me or trade me…” knies is a big piece. Have to give to get. Minty isnt out of the question imho. Even though reports said beeker wouldnt include minty in a deal for knies at the deadline. Things change. What if minty doesnt want Another bridge deal and wants big bucks snd years? We don’t know what we don’t know.
 
Last edited:
Why would Dallas, a team that’s close to competing for a Cup, trade away the best player in the deal? Smells like nonsense to me
Salary is a part of it but they also probably don’t think Robertson is the best player in that deal. To me Robbo is clearly the new Taylor Hall where hockey people clearly don’t value him like fans do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbieboy3686
Why would Dallas, a team that’s close to competing for a Cup, trade away the best player in the deal? Smells like nonsense to me

Because they don't want to pay Robertson 14m+. In their position I'd rather have Larkin at 8.7 too. Protects them down the middle against the annual Hintz playoff absence due to injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv
Why would Dallas, a team that’s close to competing for a Cup, trade away the best player in the deal? Smells like nonsense to me

I'd normally agree, but the Robertson stuff has been weird for a while. Despite being incredibly productive, there have been talks of trading him for a couple years now. He was left off both the 4 Nations and Olympic rosters. I'm not sure what it is, but there seems to be something there that turns GMs off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDonald19
Detroit's 1C without Larkin will be Copp lmao. Yikes. Gibson should maybe request another trade.
They will be worse than Boston down the middle at Center. Worse than LA too, Byfield better than Copp ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad