I could see Tannehill there as the backup. He’s done well in run based systems, like Tomlin’sIt's pretty much just trash left in FA. They might be the 6th QB in the first round. If so, should push another good player into the second.
I could see Tannehill there as the backup. He’s done well in run based systems, like Tomlin’sIt's pretty much just trash left in FA. They might be the 6th QB in the first round. If so, should push another good player into the second.
Those two are readymade to start now, so it would not surprise me….Maye isn’t.
Yeah, I could see that. Still, I think they'd be looking for a young guy to build up over a year or two.I could see Tannehill there as the backup. He’s done well in run based systems, like Tomlin’s
They are def betting on Wilson.Yeah, I could see that. Still, I think they'd be looking for a young guy to build up over a year or two.
I think a Wilson/Tannehill combo might be the textbook definition of "if you have 2 QBs, you don't have any QB."
Hell yesThat’s fair. I honestly don’t know how I feel about it. I think if it was 11/23 and a first next year, I may do it.
Then see if you could take 23 and 40 and move to 5 w San Diego. 5 and 11 should get you a stud OT and a QB.
I’m just talking outloud.
Would we do 2 for Herbert?
Hell no…What about 11 and 23 for our 2?
Well, there is the salary angle, AND the Chargers are getting crushed by the cap
Huuuuuuge….dead cap number $129 mil….Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the Chargers take a ridiculously huge dead cap hit if they traded Herbert like that?
Cowardly move, unless you really don’t believe there is a franchise QB after #1.Minnesota now with the #11 and #23 picks this year, and they are most likely looking to trade into the top 5. Would you concede our #2 for their #11, #23, and next year's #1 pick? That would be a pretty nice haul.
I still don't. We don't need a crap-ton of first rounders -- we need a franchise QB.Minnesota now with the #11 and #23 picks this year, and they are most likely looking to trade into the top 5. Would you concede our #2 for their #11, #23, and next year's #1 pick? That would be a pretty nice haul.
This is just nuts. I don't remember an offseason like this.
Cowardly move, unless you really don’t believe there is a franchise QB after #1.
Incredibly risky to trade back to 11 and pray whichever of 4th through 6th that you happen to believe in, is going to make it to you at 11 or 23.Or unless you think the 4th/5th/6th QB in the class is a franchise guy. I'm with you that we should most likely draft a QB at 2, but I think we also agree that the guys making the decision know what they're doing, and if they like McCarthy or whoever and can get a bunch in a trade, it's not crazy or cowardly at all to move back.
The "top 3" all have some question marks and the next 3 are all thought to be very good. Guys outside the consensus top picks end up being the best in their class pretty often.
Totally agree. Teams like the Vikings and Raiders are desperately trying to get in range for DM, and JD respectively. The Giants might move for one of them at 6. I don’t know why we’d give up our ability to choose one of DM/JD, just to get some more picks. We already have 6 in the top 100. If we want to get a LT in the 1st, take 36 and add pick(s) from this year (and/or next year) to trade up.Incredibly risky to trade back to 11 and pray whichever of 4th through 6th that you happen to believe in, is going to make it to you at 11 or 23.
It would be very “Draft Day(ish)”…….Costner movie….IF they somehow pulled off a 10 year starter at 11 ot 23…..after trading that far back…
Nice, perhaps, last year pay before retiring.Update: 1 year, $20 million