hockeykicker
Global Moderator
- Dec 3, 2014
- 35,786
- 13,870
See, now this is the sh*t that terrifies me - drafting a smaller, weaker armed version of Fields.
The Nate Tice (from the Athletic) article referenced is a really good read.
I’m trying to be excited about both JD & DM. And to be clear, I have plenty of concerns about DM too. His mechanics, head-scratching plays, and the inconsistency with his accuracy (when he’s off, he is OFF and spraying the ball all over the field).
Yeah, I think that's another symptom of looking for something to criticize.This kind of dovetails with my first look at JD, which was his highlights were all runs and bombs. I get that's what you usually put in a highlight reel for a mobile QB, but seeing a stat like that is concerning.
Does it fit the "he reads defenses" angle? Seems unlikely that all the DCs in the NCAA the last several years just clogged the middle of the field against him and totally locked it down so he threw to the perimeter or ran.
More likely those were his go-to plays and they kept using them until the other side could stop them. Could have been an OC decision, too.
Isn't that what college offenses do? Force the other side to defend their strength, and exploit whatever weakness they can find until it doesn't work anymore?
All of these guys work from the shotgun, too. That's another complicating factor. Starting from the SG predisposes to a perimeter offense or RPO.
Yeah. I also think he's getting a lot of education on a new sport (at least in terms of his investment portfolio.)If I was the owner and we were about to pick the face of the franchise, I’d be in those meetings also. I just wouldn’t make the pick myself, I’d let the football guys decide ultimately.
See, now this is the sh*t that terrifies me - drafting a smaller, weaker armed version of Fields.
The Nate Tice (from the Athletic) article referenced is a really good read.
I’m trying to be excited about both JD & DM. And to be clear, I have plenty of concerns about DM too. His mechanics, head-scratching plays, and the inconsistency with his accuracy (when he’s off, he is OFF and spraying the ball all over the field).
The difference, again, is that you're projecting hope and belief onto a kid that he will turn into what the other guy is.The difference, again, is that Daniels has 3 years of XP on Maye.
A 21 year old QB playing for a subpar college team should have inconsistencies in his game. It’s what he does well and projects to do well at the NFL level that’s important.
Show me a twiggy running QB that’s gotten through the thresher that is the NFL season and playoffs and won a SB. I’ll wait.
Daniels WILL get hurt and he will get sacked and that pick will make everyone cringe for 15 years as Drake Maye goes on to a successful career with the Pats or Giants or whomever.
See, now this is the sh*t that terrifies me - drafting a smaller, weaker armed version of Fields.
The Nate Tice (from the Athletic) article referenced is a really good read.
I’m trying to be excited about both JD & DM. And to be clear, I have plenty of concerns about DM too. His mechanics, head-scratching plays, and the inconsistency with his accuracy (when he’s off, he is OFF and spraying the ball all over the field).
Why would you trade down to draft Jake Plummer?!Which is why we should trade down and take JJ!!!
He had two elite WRs in Nabers and Thomas on the outside. So to some extent it makes sense that he’d be targeting them outside the numbers. If anything, opposing teams should be bracketing those 2 guys and forcing JD to the MOF. However, watching his games, he passes up open guys in the middle of the field to run a lot (and the numbers support this).This kind of dovetails with my first look at JD, which was his highlights were all runs and bombs. I get that's what you usually put in a highlight reel for a mobile QB, but seeing a stat like that is concerning.
Does it fit the "he reads defenses" angle? Seems unlikely that all the DCs in the NCAA the last several years just clogged the middle of the field against him and totally locked it down so he threw to the perimeter or ran.
More likely those were his go-to plays and they kept using them until the other side could stop them. Could have been an OC decision, too.
Isn't that what college offenses do? Force the other side to defend their strength, and exploit whatever weakness they can find until it doesn't work anymore?
All of these guys work from the shotgun, too. That's another complicating factor. Starting from the SG predisposes to a perimeter offense or RPO.
Incoming snyder meddling comments
Josh needs to understand, we are a deeply scarred fanbase, and easily spooked.
If I was the owner and we were about to pick the face of the franchise, I’d be in those meetings also. I just wouldn’t make the pick myself, I’d let the football guys decide ultimately.
The difference, again, is that Daniels has 3 years of XP on Maye.
A 21 year old QB playing for a subpar college team should have inconsistencies in his game. It’s what he does well and projects to do well at the NFL level that’s important.
Show me a twiggy running QB that’s gotten through the thresher that is the NFL season and playoffs and won a SB. I’ll wait.
Daniels WILL get hurt and he will get sacked and that pick will make everyone cringe for 15 years as Drake Maye goes on to a successful career with the Pats or Giants or whomever.
In college as a 5 year starter. His sack rate is terrible and he won’t get away with half of that shit in the NFL.
Daniels would be a catastrophic pick.
It’s probably both, but come on, it’s THE franchise decision. Something that could have ramifications for the next decade plus….He’s checking out the QB process primarily IMO, but sure, he’s probably just absorbing what all these guys he hired are doing….I look at this more like, we have a new NFL owner, who hired a new first time GM, and a new HC and new OC, so maybe he wants to evaluate THEM, more so than he wants to evaluate the QBs. They all need to be aligned, so if one of them pounds the table for this guy, or that guy, the owner should be able to figure out which guy got it right and which guy was wrong. If the HC and the GM have different opinions on the QB, which happened a lot during the Gibbs/Beathard era, then the Owner (JKC) typically would provide the tie breaker, or at least be able to grade the outcome based on the differences of opinion. If I'm the new owner in this situation, I'm not sitting at home hoping it all works out, I'm evaluation the heck out of every last detail. The staff, not the players, specifically.
Dan Snyder would in there telling the staff who he wanted them to pick. I suspect Josh is there figuring out which of his staff know the best how to get to the right decision.
Love the passion for the debate Dave!You know how I know you're FOS? You're information is just wrong. Please double check your sources.
Here are screenshots of the stats for all three players. The specific things that you claim, his "sack rate" is terrible, its demonstrably false.
Specifically, JS was sacked on 20.2% of his pressures. Maye was 19.5, CW was 23.2. Simply put, if Daniels sack to pressure ratio is awful, then so is each of the other two top QBs. JD got sacked 21 times in 408 drop backs, for a .051%, roughly 1 in 20 times. DM got sacked 29 times in drop backs, for .057%, which is slightly higher, roughly 1 in 17.5 times. CW was sacked 35 times in 455 drop backs, for a huge .076%, roughly every 13 times he dropped back to pass. There's no evidence or statistic which shows JD's pressure to sack ratio is anything other than right in the middle of the big three QBs, in fact is the best of the three QBs.
Further...
JD's throw aways was only 5, Maye was 21, CW 24, meaning under pressure, those guys threw the ball away more than JD, but yet those guys also threw interceptions or would be interceptions at a higher rate than JD (JD TWP% = 1.6%, DM 1.9%, CW 3.6%)
Finally, the Big Time Throws (BTT and BTT%) under pressure went like this: JD 6 for 11.3%, DM 7 for 6.9%, CW 10 for 8.3%). So when they were under pressure, JD threw the ball away less often but made more big time players more often as a percentage of times they were under pressure.
Simply put, I don't what you're watching or quoting, but you're incorrect about JD under pressure. Statistically, he's the best of the top three under pressure, and vs CW its not even close.
It’s probably both, but come on, it’s THE franchise decision. Something that could have ramifications for the next decade plus….He’s checking out the QB process primarily IMO, but sure, he’s probably just absorbing what all these guys he hired are doing….
Love the passion for the debate Dave!