Ovechkins Wodka
Registered User
I could see the pats going with a vet QB like Cousins or Russel Wilson to go with Marvin. But FA is before the draft so they would have to tip their hand
So might we …. do the same! Obv if the team grabs a vet QB, and/or Edge Rushers, Linebackers, Secondary, O-Line, Tight ends …..hell, pretty much everything!!I could see the pats going with a vet QB like Cousins or Russel Wilson to go with Marvin. But FA is before the draft so they would have to tip their hand
ESPN2 is doing a new draft show now
Mel had us taking JD at #2 and I turned it off,Let me guess, all the NY/LA/NE teams are moving up and nabbing all the best players?
lol. The morning shows last week literally had the Giants moving up for DM. Then the Pats taking him at 3. Then the Raiders trading up for JD.Let me guess, all the NY/LA/NE teams are moving up and nabbing all the best players?
Getting spicy. Give me ekeler or pollard to run with brob
I don’t hate the idea of splurging a bit on one of these guys - like a 2-3 year deal. If we have all this cap space, and it doesn’t prevent signing other areas of need ofc.Those guys are going to want to get paid big time as UFA's. But the market for RBs is just so weak. Teams don't want to pay a premium for them anymore. A 3rd/4th round pick is practically free, and could offer production as a backup QB thats good enough to save $10M/per.
Free agency is about supply and demand - this huge supply at the position this offseason, something we haven't seen in a long time, could really help keep down the prices in free agency. I would be shocked if any of these backs command what their franchise tag number would be, especially in regard to ekeler/pollard who just had down seasonsThose guys are going to want to get paid big time as UFA's. But the market for RBs is just so weak. Teams don't want to pay a premium for them anymore. A 3rd/4th round pick is practically free, and could offer production as a backup QB thats good enough to save $10M/per.
I still think they let Brob be the early downs guy, but these other two would be an invaluable check down option for a rookie QB when everything else is covered or the line breaks down. And the area where both ekeler and pollard are most effective. Neither are built to be running up the middle but are great catching dump offs for big gainsI don’t hate the idea of splurging a bit on one of these guys - like a 2-3 year deal. If we have all this cap space, and it doesn’t prevent signing other areas of need ofc.
I like BRob, but he’s not very dynamic. I’d like to give our young QB all the help he can get. A good RB (that is also experienced in blitz pick up) can take some pressure off the new guy.
I would love to take barkley from the giants and have him take over for Brob completely, I just think he will easily be the highest paid out of all these guys by far. I see him going to houstonBarkley
Ekeler
Jacobs
Henry
Pollard
In that order for me. 1 and 2 are close but I've seen SB take over a game many times. Of that group only Henry has shown that kind of ability, but I fear he's likely wearing down.
Ekeler should be an awesome dual-threat player but something about his game seems soft. Same with Jacobs to a degree.
Pollard...OK, I guess. But still feel like he was better as an RB2.
A little bit of both. He’s had some injury years (plural), but I believe his last 2 have been relatively healthy?Hasn’t Barkley been, shall we say, not so durable? Or am I confusing one season, where he was hurt most of it, and expanding that into others?
Hasn’t Barkley been, shall we say, not so durable? Or am I confusing one season, where he was hurt most of it, and expanding that into others?
jd hasn't run air raid and maye has.No idea where all the JD to Washington stuff is coming from besides Kliff Kingsbury has coached mobile QBs.
Okay?
Maye is mobile and also not a pipe cleaner.
this. he can't stay healthy and rb is very short term in this league. don't waste money on him.Hasn’t Barkley been, shall we say, not so durable? Or am I confusing one season, where he was hurt most of it, and expanding that into others?