Not to put it out there, but if TML, um, caught a really bad flu that knocked him out for a month or 2 or 3, what would our offense look like then?
Well, as long as we're giving guys fictional illnesses, isn't it just as likely that the wideout you trade for will, um, accidentally slam his pecker in a car door and be out for a month or 2 or 3? Then what?
Guys get injured. You're basically arguing, "We only have Terry! So let's give up some draft picks to get WR2 or 1b or whatever so that if Terry gets injured we will be right back where we started, which I'm saying is not good enough!"
If you're also saying, "OR they both stay healthy and the new guy gives us a real chance to win a Super Bowl," I would remind you that we just got very steadily handled by a team with a can't-miss offense because they can score at will AND stop a strong opposing offense from scoring more. We don't have that.
If you think we're trading for that WR AND enough players to shore up our defense, you've bumped your head. Patience. Maybe Terry won't get that fictional flu.
Our D is at least 2 players from being good -- either 2 DBs or 1 rusher and 1 DB -- and honestly, possibly more.
Our O is one player away from being almost unstoppable.
So we have basically the worst D in the league, and marginally improving our offense is going to overcome that? I'm all for you and Rid's "Let's live in The Now!" mentality, but I'm also a fan of living in reality. We're not one receiver away from doing something incredible.
It wouldn't upset me if the team made a reasonable trade for a Higgins, for example. But if they do that and nothing else, all it likely does for us this year, if anything, is to win maybe a little more. Giving up picks to lower our draft position seems counterintuitive to me.
There will be plenty of talent in free agency next year. It's like we've been shot in the chest, stumbled into triage, and you're prioritizing the scrape on our elbow over the sucking chest wound.