TominNC
Registered User
Better chance you screw up what's working.. Looking for the perfect checkers move.How about having 3 lines that work. I think I'd go with that option.
Better chance you screw up what's working.. Looking for the perfect checkers move.How about having 3 lines that work. I think I'd go with that option.
Drury got praised for finding deals in the bargain bin. Vatrano for a 4th. Motte for a 4th. Braun for a 3rd. The only big trade we made was for Copp. It ended up being Morgan Barron, a 1st, a 2nd and a 5th for Copp and a 6th.
Copp had 18 points in 16 regular season games playing with Panarin, got injured toward the end of the year, then only had 14 points in 20 playoff games. Those numbers aren't terrible, but not exactly worth what we paid, and then we didn't re-sign him. All of those assets were wasted.
Stuff like this is why I'm against trading significant assets for rentals. We can find guys who can contribute without mortgaging the future.
If we want to trade those 1st and 2nd rounders for players who will be here long term, fine. I'm good with that. But by long term, I mean a guy who is young and entering his prime. Not someone like Guentzel who is turning 30 and will be getting a large, 7-8 year deal as a pending UFA. We can sign Guentzel in the offseason to the same contract without trading for him first, if we want. Spending that many assets for 1 playoff run is foolish.
Yes, yes Bill Zito is God and Chris Drury is a chump…
Even though Florida just barely squeaked into the playoffs last year…. But that was just an aberration. Zito = God, Drury = Chump.
If we're trading Kakko, it has to be an offseason move. Trading him now for a RW just means we have to make another trade to replace Kakko.Rather rent a cheap RW or go balzy with a Kakko , Jones package for 2 RW with term
Buch isn't that much different than Guentzel. He's going to cost a lot to acquire, both because he has that extra year, and because we would need them to retain.Which is a reason why I could deal with us using a 1st to bring back Buchnevich because he's still signed for next year and if worse comes to worse you at least have the option of flipping him again next year and barring injury should get back at least most if not all of your investment. Guentzel is not that. If we could pry Tuch from Buffalo but that's probably a pipedream.
No mention of the Rangers, which makes sense
IF they trade Kakko here, which I don't think they will, IMO the logic would be that a 3rd line winger is easier to replace with a Vesey or Brodzinski than is the position with Kreider and ZibanejadIf we're trading Kakko, it has to be an offseason move. Trading him now for a RW just means we have to make another trade to replace Kakko.
I don't think anyone was upset that Buchnevich was traded. The problem was, and always will be, the return. He's one of the few impact forwards we have drafted and developed, and we gave him away for nothing. Now people want to spend significant assets to get him back.I love how the we never develop the kidz crowd is still harping on a trade that was made specifically and whole heartedly to make more room for and give more opportunities to the kids.
and use the assets to upgrade LHD. beautifulI get the sense that Zucker is going to be the forgotten man and go for peanuts close to the deadline.
Also, low key, Okposo will likely be the same.
Drury could add both guys for less than what Buch or Guentzel will require.
they also won the PT the year before and have a very real chance to win it this year.Yes, yes Bill Zito is God and Chris Drury is a chump…
Even though Florida just barely squeaked into the playoffs last year…. But that was just an aberration. Zito = God, Drury = Chump.
Neither of those guys get you a Cup (by themselves or together), so there's not much point in it.I get the sense that Zucker is going to be the forgotten man and go for peanuts close to the deadline.
Also, low key, Okposo will likely be the same.
Drury could add both guys for less than what Buch or Guentzel will require.
Does upgrading at 1RW and downgrading at 3RW help us that much? I don't think so. And if we have injuries, that's one less player we have to fill a spot.IF they trade Kakko here, which I don't think they will, IMO the logic would be that a 3rd line winger is easier to replace with a Vesey or Brodzinski than is the position with Kreider and Zibanejad
Neither of those guys get you a Cup (by themselves or together), so there's not much point in it.
The only reason to trade for one of them is to make Kakko expendable for a bigger 1RW move.
and use the assets to upgrade LHD. beautiful
they want a 2nd but no one is biting. If we can get Zucker for a 3rd. I'd take it.
Then add Chychrun with some futures.
We need puck carriers spread out through the top9. Right now, Panarin, Trocheck and Laffy are our best puck carriers. They are all on the same line.Better chance you screw up what's working.. Looking for the perfect checkers move.
If we're trading Kakko, it has to be an offseason move. Trading him now for a RW just means we have to make another trade to replace Kakko.
Buch isn't that much different than Guentzel. He's going to cost a lot to acquire, both because he has that extra year, and because we would need them to retain.
We'd have him for 1.25 years, but then he'd need a new contract at age 30. Drury screwed up badly when he traded Buch. There's no two ways about it. Let's not compound that screw up by trying to undo it.
No mention of the Rangers, which makes sense
I just don't see a scenario where a team icing Jason Zucker, Kyle Okposo, or Kaapo Kakko on their top line is going to compete with Vegas or Florida.I'd argue that this isn't true. The team needs better depth at RW and they need to find someone who can augment Kreider-Zibanejad. Add both Zucker and Okposo and the they have real NHL depth on the wing and (2) options to play with those guys.
and use the assets to upgrade LHD. beautiful
they want a 2nd but no one is biting. If we can get Zucker for a 3rd. I'd take it.
Then add Chychrun with some futures.
I just don't see a scenario where a team icing Jason Zucker, Kyle Okposo, or Kaapo Kakko on their top line is going to compete with Vegas or Florida.
I think you either go all-in (in this case, that means acquiring a true 1RW) or you don't. Middle ground doesn't get you anywhere.
No mention of the Rangers, which makes sense