CapSpace
Caufield is lit
This draft is gonna be very exciting.
I really do hope we'd take a shot at that hothead russian Surin with our 26th pick.
I really do hope we'd take a shot at that hothead russian Surin with our 26th pick.
Are you willing to put faith that Byram turns into a top pairing stud after the age of 22 and know what we know today? That was just one example of someone who was pumped very high and many liked him a lot!
I would not bet more than 1 or 2 top pairing guys in this draft. Lots of top 4D though.
The 2-10 or 2-13 is wild. Lots of talent to choose from on both D and F but very difficult to establish BPA (list one after another).
and this board melts downI am already prepared for the following events to unfold on the 28th of June:
View attachment 886247
Martin Lapoine : "Nick, Columbus just took Lindstrom. We are picking after the commercial break. Demidov is on the board, so is Iginla, Buium and Dickinson. Who are we going with"
Nick Brobov: "I think Sam Dickinson and Buium have the potential to become fantastic defenseman".
Kent Hughes: "Aren't we already loaded at LD tho?"
Nick Brobov : "Always go for BPA Kent. Remember Reinbacher last season: see how he performed last season in the last 10 games with the Rockets?"
Martin Lapointe : "He is right Kent, I think those defenseman are too high profile to pass on. I say we pick the first on our list".
View attachment 886246
Kent Hughes: "With the 5th Overall selection of the 2024 entry draft, the Montreal Canadiens are proud to select, from the OHL London Knights: Sam Dickinson".
View attachment 886252
Sam Dickinson: " I am so proud of being part of this historical organisation. I compare myself stylistically to Kaiden Ghule, I can't wait to meet him and learn from his experience".
That's kinda what I mean. His best moments look very good. More fluid and more spectacular than Iginla's. But Iginla has 3 good moments to Sennecke's every 2 in my estimation. Maybe 4 to 3.
What's worth more? I can't say for sure right now.
Yea Byram is not a finished product as he missed nearly 2 seasons of development because of concussion issues. He also happened to play behind the best offensive defenseman in the league who eats a lot of minutes so his opportunities in Colorado were limited.It is not that I would necessarily bet that Byram becomes a top pairing D which is a subjective term and some would take that to mean that he would need to supplant Dahlin as the number one LHD at some point. The real point is that it does not make sense at all to write him off as a non top pairing dman after just finishing his 22 year old season and having battled enormous injury issues. Byram absolutely still has top pairing upside, whether he raeches this blurry line or not remains to be seen.....if indeed it ultimately can be seen.
It’s not Parekh’s D that concerns me.
And Saginaw played great five-man D; very structured and passing lanes became turnover lanes.
Parekh, from what I saw of him, doesn’t like physicality. I saw that stick come up when about to be hit.
That can be ‘fixed’ and I can view his spitting at two Kingston players as a one-time-only thing, but overall he just didn’t promote any “man, the Habs could use this guy!” when I saw him.
Certainly Didn’t earn a ‘character’ label.
Lol I used the 26th on him in a mock draftI think the last time there was close to a consensus here for a pick was Caufield. Hutson may have been but I wasn't on the board that day lol.
Good post.PLAN A
1. We draft Demidov
2. We use trading chips (matheson) to get Mcgroarty out of WPG
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Demidov- Dach - Mcgroarty
Newhook - Beck - Roy
Hutson - Reinbacher
Guhle - Mailloux
PLAN B
If Demidov is off the board when we pick
1. We draft Dickinson
2. We trade Mailloux and WPG first rounder for Zegras
3. We use trading chips (matheson) to get Mcgroarty out of WPG
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Zegras - Dach - Mcgroarty
Newhook - Beck - Roy
Dickinson - Reinbacher
Hutson - Guhle
PLAN C
If Demidov and Dickinson are off the board when we pick
1. We draft Buium
2. We trade Hutson for Zegras
3. We use trading chips (matheson) to get Mcgroarty out of WPG
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Zegras - Dach - Mcgroarty
Newhook - Beck - Roy
Buium - Reinbacher
Guhle - Mailloux
PLAN D
If Demidov, Dickinson and Buium are off the board when we pick
1. We draft Ignila or Lindstrom
2. We use trading chips (matheson) to get Mcgroarty out of WPG
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Ignila/Lindstrom - Dach - Mcgroarty
Newhook - Beck - Roy
Hutson- Reinbacher
Guhle - Mailloux
Lots of possibilities....
and this board melts down
You seem to be conflating top pairing with HOF!There are a few on your list that are not top pairing. I would say 50-66% of them are though. There is a fair amount of the guys you listed as lower end top pairing and higher end top 4D. That's exactly what I am talking about with Silayev. A strong top 4D. The issue here is thinking that some guys are top pairing when they have 1 or 2 good seasons and the rest are more like top 4D quality. Personally, I don't have 64 top pairing guys in the NHL today (32 teams x 2). Just because some guys are in that role to fill the hole, it don't mean they are for all teams kind of thing. Same as Suzuki... #1C on the Habs but not on 15+ teams in the NHL.
That's 8 drafts and I'm assuming you looked from the 2000 draft? 8 in 24 drafts where you found 2+ hits as top pairing. This draft year might be one of those where 2-4 happens? Doubt it
Your definition of a top pairing seems to be Norris caliber defenseman. No, those are candidate for top 5 best defenseman in the league, not first pairing defenseman.
Teams more often than not don't have on the regular the likes of Suter, Werenski, Jones, Reilly, Chabot, Morrissey, etc. on their second pairing. Those defenseman would slot in as #2 on the first pair on most team and as #1 defenseman in low level team. To me that is the definition of a first pairing defenseman. You are not gonna get 4 Makar/Karlsson in this season's draft this is common sense. Like you are not going to find 4 Draisaitl level forward this year's draft.
There is a difference between superstar (McDavid, MacKinnon, Kucherov) and first liner (Aho, Barkov, Barzal). Doesn't mean the second group are just "strong 2nd liner").
More like :I am already prepared for the following events to unfold on the 28th of June:
View attachment 886247
Martin Lapoine : "Nick, Columbus just took Lindstrom. We are picking after the commercial break. Demidov is on the board, so is Iginla, Buium and Dickinson. Who are we going with"
Nick Brobov: "I think Sam Dickinson and Buium have the potential to become fantastic defenseman".
Kent Hughes: "Aren't we already loaded at LD tho?"
Nick Brobov : "Always go for BPA Kent. Remember Reinbacher last season: see how he performed last season in the last 10 games with the Rockets?"
Martin Lapointe : "He is right Kent, I think those defenseman are too high profile to pass on. I say we pick the first on our list".
View attachment 886246
Kent Hughes: "With the 5th Overall selection of the 2024 entry draft, the Montreal Canadiens are proud to select, from the OHL London Knights: Sam Dickinson".
View attachment 886252
Sam Dickinson: " I am so proud of being part of this historical organisation. I compare myself stylistically to Kaiden Ghule, I can't wait to meet him and learn from his experience".
Doesn't Basu do a podcast usually on Monday
get lidstrom and SenneckeCanadiens Draft Preview: Montreal enters week as one of NHL's biggest wild cards
It’s the beginning of a week that could be transformational for the Montreal Canadiens, and not just because they have two first-round picks Friday and nine other picks at their disposal for Rounds 2-7 Saturday to make their team better.www.sportsnet.ca
ONE BOLD PREDICTION
If the Canadiens don’t find a trade for a bona fide top-six forward that makes sense to them, I think they’ll try to package the 26th pick with other assets to acquire another top-10 pick.
Under this scenario, they could select two future core players and turn to free agency to fill more immediate needs.
It’s anything but assured they’ll be able to make such a move, but that’s why they call it a bold prediction.
this has been my hope for weeks now. i assume the targets would be Sennecke, Catton, and maybe even Eiserman
I want to hear that now it's Iginla that were taking so more people can freak outDon't tell the Harpoon Bazoong what to do.
It seems so because consuming a gallon of milk a day is a fantastic way to get fat for most people, even athletes
At 20 years old with his hormonal profile, a couple of months in the gym with a +/- 300-500 calorie surplus should suffice, not downing jugs of milk like a lardaass
I really recommend reading this guy's take on Silayev. His entire write-up of the draft is great.
NHL Draft Ranking 2024, by Simon St-L.
NHL Draft Ranking 2024, by Simon St-L. - TSLH -www.toutsurlehockey.com
Silayev met with the Habs
I want to hear that now it's Iginla that were taking so more people can freak out
Catton's an ultra-elite talent.They either need an ultra elite talent like demidov or elite players that play on the inside where the team needs to start playing in order to be effective. Habs have Suzuki, Dach, and Slaf who can make plays and are heavy puck dominant players. Iginla and Lindstrom would compliment this team way more than catton
Comes out in the evening usually. Anywhere from 5-7pm ESTDoesn't Basu do a podcast usually on Monday
I think 90% of the fanbase would be pleasantly surprised to see Catton taken. But I don't know, because there could be legitimately better prospects left up.does KH take him? Sasky boy
I can definitely see that with the Russian factor, winger, etc