HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Scintillating10

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
20,995
10,161
Nova Scotia
Can you give us notes?
- Said Buium be a star.
- Lindstrom is Kreider type
- If Demidov and Lindstrom gone He would take Catton at 5. He is most skilled. But thinks Habs take Sennecke because of size. Called him highlight goal machine. Inconsistent but had great playoff.
- teams don't like taking Russians high in draft.
- Hawks take Levs. Ducks take Silayev at 3. mentioned if dealt Zegras Ducks may take forward.
- Parekh could slide due to depth in defense this draft


Kind of lame actually.
 

Scintillating10

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
20,995
10,161
Nova Scotia
He was the best player on the best NCAA team as a 17 year old. And when I say best player it's not only "He made nice moves and scored goals", it's he played a crucial role both ways of the ice and played like a #1 defenceman on a championship team.

Guhle + Lane Hutson = Zeev Buium.
Holy, I'd say draft him then.
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
7,856
13,232
If Habs pick Zeev Buium if Demidov or Lindstrom are gone, I will be a very happy man.

Buium is my favorite D in this year draft class, he have the potential to become the best D in few years.

He would be a very very solid player to add with Habs.

He can play RD aswell.

Guhle - Buium.
Hutson - Reinbacher.

Or trade Guhle (I don't want trade him, but with Engstrom and Xhekaj at LD, Buium aswell, we need to trade great value to acquire great value at forward) and let play Buium with Mailloux.

Hutson - Reinbacher.
Buium - Mailloux.


That's insane D-core.
 

Gally11

Registered User
Sep 20, 2010
2,724
1,740
Toronto
Everyone talks about how Florida is built but their lack of game breaking D is glaring. Look at those PP stats in final; I’m not saying this because I want a forward to drop but Chicago going forward would be incredibly shortsighted if they leave a future #1 D on table
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
14,816
16,408
Everyone talks about how Florida is built but their lack of game breaking D is glaring. Look at those PP stats in final; I’m not saying this because I want a forward to drop but Chicago going forward would be incredibly shortsighted if they leave a future #1 D on table
I like Bouchard but he isn’t a “game breaking D”, who else do Edm have on the back end?

As for Fla PP, not enough credit if being given to Oilers dominant playoff PK - it’s been legendary throughout the playoffs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Icing

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,195
7,476
Buium-Reinbacher
Guhle-Mailloux
Hutson-Xhekaj


You get 3 minute munching all situations defenseman in your top 4. That projects well for the playoffs, which is how they are building this team, to win a cup.

Also right now Hutson is their only player that projects to be a puck moving defenseman. They might not feel comfortable gambling on him becoming a top 4 guy and can play playoff hockey to pass on Buium who is basically a lock to be one, probably closer to top pairing.
Let’s say Buium needs a year of seasoning before he’s ready. I don’t know his plans, but not unreasonable for a 5 OA …

In 2025, do you think Hughes would roll with a D corps with 24 year old Xhekaj as the oldest player?

I don’t - and I like the lines. I’d just expect a trade … or an extension … or both.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
41,405
38,073
Montreal
Everyone talks about how Florida is built but their lack of game breaking D is glaring. Look at those PP stats in final; I’m not saying this because I want a forward to drop but Chicago going forward would be incredibly shortsighted if they leave a future #1 D on table
Well f*** they had Matheson. :sarcasm:
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: Shred and Gally11

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,606
44,318
Florida is missing a Buium 😉
I’d say it’s a bigger problem than that. But they have gone to the Finals two years in a row without anyone spectacular on D. It’s not like the Oilers have a lot of great defenders, they have one pairing.

Florida is just getting outworked and out-skated. Anyone who signs Reinhart to a massive contract is going to regret it. He is the worst 57 goal scorer I’ve seen. Slow as molasses and zero physicality.
 

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
38,885
20,195
1st rounders drafted out of the Russian jr league;







 

Gally11

Registered User
Sep 20, 2010
2,724
1,740
Toronto
I like Bouchard but he isn’t a “game breaking D”, who else do Edm have on the back end?

As for Fla PP, not enough credit if being given to Oilers dominant playoff PK - it’s been legendary throughout the playoffs

Having one of the best players to ever play the game up front can help mitigate that issue lol and then your 2nd best player being Draisaitl doesn’t hurt. But Oilers as a team started turning around with solid D like Ekholm and Bouchard progressing, not a coincidence, McDavid was arguably better through first few rounds last year
 

Playmaker09

Registered User
Sep 11, 2008
3,518
1,816
I really want a forward but if it's gonna be a dman, I'm taking Sam Dickinson.

Guhle-Mailloux
Dickinson-Reinbacher
Hutson-Zhekaj

Taking a dman is actually not that bad..
One of the things that needs to be considered is cap management.

Guhle, Reinbacher and Dickinson (or whoever we draft) are all going to get paid based on draft pedigree (top 15 picks).
Hutson will also get paid due to PP1 production.

Are we going to spend 35+ million a year on defense?
I don't think that's a winning formula. Ideally you want at least one top 4 guy making below average money (someone to just play stay-at-home D with Hutson).

Below should be more than fine:

Guhle - Reinbacher (heavy matchup focus)
Hutson - Struble/Xhekaj/Kovacevic/Cheap Veteran
Xhekaj/Struble - Mailloux/Kovacevic/Barron
 

The Last Red

Registered User
Jan 2, 2022
1,366
1,526
- Said Buium be a star.
- Lindstrom is Kreider type
- If Demidov and Lindstrom gone He would take Catton at 5. He is most skilled. But thinks Habs take Sennecke because of size. Called him highlight goal machine. Inconsistent but had great playoff.
- teams don't like taking Russians high in draft.
- Hawks take Levs. Ducks take Silayev at 3. mentioned if dealt Zegras Ducks may take forward.
- Parekh could slide due to depth in defense this draft


Kind of lame actually.
I’ve read that Sennecke’s comparable is Spezza. I’m not sure that’s what I want. But maybe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dutronc
Apr 28, 2010
17,779
7,033
One of the things that needs to be considered is cap management.

Guhle, Reinbacher and Dickinson (or whoever we draft) are all going to get paid based on draft pedigree (top 15 picks).
Hutson will also get paid due to PP1 production.

Are we going to spend 35+ million a year on defense?
I don't think that's a winning formula. Ideally you want at least one top 4 guy making below average money (someone to just play stay-at-home D with Hutson).

Below should be more than fine:

Guhle - Reinbacher (heavy matchup focus)
Hutson - Struble/Xhekaj/Kovacevic/Cheap Veteran
Xhekaj/Struble - Mailloux/Kovacevic/Barron
Oh, for sure. It'll be a good problem to have regardless. Just hope we don't give someone a Nurse-like contract down the line.

I still want the Habs to draft one of Demidov/Lindstrom/Iginla. That's still the priority. If not, I wouldn't be mad drafting Dickinson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phillytennis

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
7,821
12,065
No. I acknowledged up front that I'm in the minority on Levshunov and have been all season and that there are some hockey people out there who have the same questions I do on some important areas for a defenseman especially as they move up to the next level. Nobody is questioning his offense or tools and far more scouts are higher than me on Levshunov. That's why he's in the top 5 on most lists. I still think he's a strong prospect who would obviously be great to have in the system but I don't have him top 5. We'll know in 3-5 years. No need to always get so sensitive when someone points out an imperfection or questions something about a player you like.

If Reinbacher was in this draft, he'd likely be anywhere between 1-7 in the D rankings depending on the list. One thing Reinbacher has going for him is that he has tested well against men in strong pro leagues. The transition from amateur to the NHL for young D isn't easy and usually takes time.
Okay — I’ll try this again: what do “some hockey people” have to say about his defensive game?

You referred to them and didn’t really demonstrate what they said. I’ve been genuinely curious about this but you keep changing your tone. As far as I can see, the hockey consensus is that Levshunov is a very very good prospect and likely the top dman prospect of this year and last.

I have zero attachment to Lev or Celebrini because I figure they’d be gone before the Habs pick. Not everything has a psychological angle to it, it could be that you’re just not communicating your thoughts in a way I can understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad