Skip Bayless
The Skip Bayless Show
- Aug 28, 2014
- 21,193
- 24,048
If guhle can play effectively RHD, Buium is an awesome pick. Run Buium-Guhle and Hutson-Reinbacher 45 mins a game and see what happens
Buium can play RHD as well as LHD.
If guhle can play effectively RHD, Buium is an awesome pick. Run Buium-Guhle and Hutson-Reinbacher 45 mins a game and see what happens
Did not know that. That explains the rumor Habs are interestedBuium can play RHD as well as LHD.
The sarcasm emoji suggests I don't actually know.Please don't tell me a name. I want it to remain a surprise until the Sharks announce the pick on draft night.
VERY Interesting... was that Pronmans final mock?Pronman more accurate than Bobby over the last 2 drafts? (Tho Bob’s isn’t a mock and is gathering opinions)
- Said Buium be a star.Can you give us notes?
Holy, I'd say draft him then.He was the best player on the best NCAA team as a 17 year old. And when I say best player it's not only "He made nice moves and scored goals", it's he played a crucial role both ways of the ice and played like a #1 defenceman on a championship team.
Guhle + Lane Hutson = Zeev Buium.
Holy, I'd say draft him then.
I like Bouchard but he isn’t a “game breaking D”, who else do Edm have on the back end?Everyone talks about how Florida is built but their lack of game breaking D is glaring. Look at those PP stats in final; I’m not saying this because I want a forward to drop but Chicago going forward would be incredibly shortsighted if they leave a future #1 D on table
Let’s say Buium needs a year of seasoning before he’s ready. I don’t know his plans, but not unreasonable for a 5 OA …Buium-Reinbacher
Guhle-Mailloux
Hutson-Xhekaj
You get 3 minute munching all situations defenseman in your top 4. That projects well for the playoffs, which is how they are building this team, to win a cup.
Also right now Hutson is their only player that projects to be a puck moving defenseman. They might not feel comfortable gambling on him becoming a top 4 guy and can play playoff hockey to pass on Buium who is basically a lock to be one, probably closer to top pairing.
Well f*** they had Matheson.Everyone talks about how Florida is built but their lack of game breaking D is glaring. Look at those PP stats in final; I’m not saying this because I want a forward to drop but Chicago going forward would be incredibly shortsighted if they leave a future #1 D on table
He took his ball and went home after the World Championships played out.What happened to @Goldenhands ?
I’d say it’s a bigger problem than that. But they have gone to the Finals two years in a row without anyone spectacular on D. It’s not like the Oilers have a lot of great defenders, they have one pairing.Florida is missing a Buium
I don’t think that’s fair to Demidov. He should not have been in the MHL. His team was being spiteful.1st rounders drafted out of the Russian jr league;
I like Bouchard but he isn’t a “game breaking D”, who else do Edm have on the back end?
As for Fla PP, not enough credit if being given to Oilers dominant playoff PK - it’s been legendary throughout the playoffs
One of the things that needs to be considered is cap management.I really want a forward but if it's gonna be a dman, I'm taking Sam Dickinson.
Guhle-Mailloux
Dickinson-Reinbacher
Hutson-Zhekaj
Taking a dman is actually not that bad..
I’ve read that Sennecke’s comparable is Spezza. I’m not sure that’s what I want. But maybe.- Said Buium be a star.
- Lindstrom is Kreider type
- If Demidov and Lindstrom gone He would take Catton at 5. He is most skilled. But thinks Habs take Sennecke because of size. Called him highlight goal machine. Inconsistent but had great playoff.
- teams don't like taking Russians high in draft.
- Hawks take Levs. Ducks take Silayev at 3. mentioned if dealt Zegras Ducks may take forward.
- Parekh could slide due to depth in defense this draft
Kind of lame actually.
Do you think Demidov goes at #2?
If he's so far above the rest he should.
Believe it or not I don't think everyone thinks Demidov is.
Oh, for sure. It'll be a good problem to have regardless. Just hope we don't give someone a Nurse-like contract down the line.One of the things that needs to be considered is cap management.
Guhle, Reinbacher and Dickinson (or whoever we draft) are all going to get paid based on draft pedigree (top 15 picks).
Hutson will also get paid due to PP1 production.
Are we going to spend 35+ million a year on defense?
I don't think that's a winning formula. Ideally you want at least one top 4 guy making below average money (someone to just play stay-at-home D with Hutson).
Below should be more than fine:
Guhle - Reinbacher (heavy matchup focus)
Hutson - Struble/Xhekaj/Kovacevic/Cheap Veteran
Xhekaj/Struble - Mailloux/Kovacevic/Barron
Okay — I’ll try this again: what do “some hockey people” have to say about his defensive game?No. I acknowledged up front that I'm in the minority on Levshunov and have been all season and that there are some hockey people out there who have the same questions I do on some important areas for a defenseman especially as they move up to the next level. Nobody is questioning his offense or tools and far more scouts are higher than me on Levshunov. That's why he's in the top 5 on most lists. I still think he's a strong prospect who would obviously be great to have in the system but I don't have him top 5. We'll know in 3-5 years. No need to always get so sensitive when someone points out an imperfection or questions something about a player you like.
If Reinbacher was in this draft, he'd likely be anywhere between 1-7 in the D rankings depending on the list. One thing Reinbacher has going for him is that he has tested well against men in strong pro leagues. The transition from amateur to the NHL for young D isn't easy and usually takes time.