HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,106
3,950
The thing with KK is that the entire hype was created by a 7 game sample size at the U18. He was bad in the Liiga playoffs, he didn’t end his season very well.

Sennecke’s hype is based on his final ~40 games. He just continuously got stronger as the season went on.

I don’t think they are comparable. If we are talking the clumsy looking physicality, notice that Sennecke doesn’t actually fall. KK was called Bambi for a reason.
I disagree. KK had good Liiga stats (better than Slaf actually), he was also very good in Liiga, created space for his linemates, was showing great promise as a playmaker. This rhetoric needs to stop. He was top 20 already at the beginning of his D year and top 10 at time of the lottery, actually quite similar to the Sennecke story.

It does not mean Sennecke will fail to be a top line winger, but we need to stop with the KK revisionism…
 

CAUFIELD

Registered User
Oct 16, 2015
886
1,345
The thing with KK is that the entire hype was created by a 7 game sample size at the U18. He was bad in the Liiga playoffs, he didn’t end his season very well.

Sennecke’s hype is based on his final ~40 games. He just continuously got stronger as the season went on.

I don’t think they are comparable. If we are talking the clumsy looking physicality, notice that Sennecke doesn’t actually fall. KK was called Bambi for a reason.
Good point . But would you be really happy to have Sennecke instead of one of Dickinson , Lindstrom , Demidov or Lesh? I wouldn’t .
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
94,690
104,330
Halifax
I'm surprised there isn't much talk about moving up to Anaheim's pick since they seem to want a defenseman. If CHI takes a D-man and CLB is going forward, would ANA not be interested in getting extra assets while still being able to take their guy at 5? Then the Habs can have their pick of the forwards (Demidov).

I think the reason for that would be that if Anaheim switches with Montreal, and Montreal takes the forward CBJ wants, then CBJ could take the defenseman that Anaheim is targeting.

CBJ isn't going forward for sure, I would argue the defenseman at the top of the class are a bigger need for them.

Or over McCarron lovers in which case that s the opposite ?

I can't think of a single person who wanted McCarron in the 1st round.
 

Habs Icing

Formerly Onice
Jan 17, 2004
19,924
11,756
Montreal
Everything about Dickinson screams #1 defenseman in the NHL: Skill, size, attitude, pedigree...

He has a very high floor and is very low risk. I'm not surprised to hear that the Hawks may take him at #2.
Maybe those are screams of a man being tortured
I can't think of a single person who wanted McCarron in the 1st round.
I can think of a conference room full. Bergevin and his merry scouts.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: habsfan891

Saundies

Fly On The Wall
Jun 8, 2012
3,217
4,642
NB, Canada
The Habs should draft, develop and then trade any successful players for picks and draft new players to repeat the cycle with

The Oakland Athletics strategy! I like it.

Everything about Dickinson screams #1 defenseman in the NHL: Skill, size, attitude, pedigree...

He has a very high floor and is very low risk. I'm not surprised to hear that the Hawks may take him at #2.

Honestly, Dickinson is making me consider my "forward or bust" mantra for this year's draft... I wouldn't be devastated let's put it that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gustave

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,106
3,950
I genuinely don t understand how Buium is not generating more interest : great puck mover, skater, good defensively, he is basically a taller version of Q Hughes and he has scored much more than him in their respective draft years… I d take him without any hesitation at 5 and I don t see why CHI or ANA or CBJ would not be interested either
 

Seb

All we are is Dustin Byfuglien
Jul 15, 2006
17,745
13,941
I genuinely don t understand how Buium is not generating more interest : great puck mover, skater, good defensively, he is basically a taller version of Q Hughes and he has scored much more than him in their respective draft years… I d take him without any hesitation at 5 and I don t see why CHI or ANA or CBJ would not be interested either

Simon St-Laurent did a great video on Buium :

 
  • Like
Reactions: bopeep

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,607
44,324
Good point . But would you be really happy to have Sennecke instead of one of Dickinson , Lindstrom , Demidov or Lesh? I wouldn’t .
It would be a ballsy move but I trust Adam Nicholas and the development team.
 

Kents polished head

Formerly Tough Au Lit
Feb 4, 2013
9,673
4,656
You have some fair points for sure. I do understand the stats concerns, but I wouldn't really say Iginlas stats are that much more impressive. The attitude thing is definitely scary, but it seems like the Habs under Hughes have really targeted hard working guys, so if it is true they likely won't take him. Sennecke really progressed as the year went on... but Iginla certainly stepped up when things mattered. I would be more excited by Iginla even though I do feel like the upside is not quite as high.... I think he will help teams win and those types are always my favs.

I guess we will see on draft day. I honestly wouldn't be shocked by much after pick #1.

Oh, I fully expect us to pick Sennecke at this point. The noises aren't there for no reason, and it absolutely IS an unpredictable draft past the 1st pick.

I just think there are way safer alternatives here for a team craving for any kind of a serious forward prospect, really.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
84,669
153,658
Like Iginla, Lindstrom sees himself more as a centre in the NHL, than a winger:

Malgré cela, Lindstrom, qui se voit davantage comme un centre qu’un ailier dans la LNH, est d’avis que l’aspect finesse de son jeu n’est pas suffisamment reconnu.

Lindstrom believes that the finesse side of his play, is not widely acknowledged.

He has a high compete level and what is also bound to draw attention is the type of aggressiveness and meanness he displays.

 

Gustave

Registered User
Feb 15, 2007
8,464
5,863
Here
Simon St-Laurent did a great video on Buium :


I genuinely don t understand how Buium is not generating more interest : great puck mover, skater, good defensively, he is basically a taller version of Q Hughes and he has scored much more than him in their respective draft years… I d take him without any hesitation at 5 and I don t see why CHI or ANA or CBJ would not be interested either
I think both Dickinson and Buium are the top 2 D’s in this draft. They are not getting passed the 7th overall if I try to play Nostradamus a bit.

Lev gets picked maybe the 2nd overall because of the RD premium and Silayev will get picked somewhere in there because of his size. It’s a hell of a year to be in the hunt for a Dman.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,607
44,324
I disagree. KK had good Liiga stats (better than Slaf actually), he was also very good in Liiga, created space for his linemates, was showing great promise as a playmaker. This rhetoric needs to stop. He was top 20 already at the beginning of his D year and top 10 at time of the lottery, actually quite similar to the Sennecke story.

It does not mean Sennecke will fail to be a top line winger, but we need to stop with the KK revisionism…
Yeah he had a better season as a whole but didn’t improve as it went on is my point. Not to the level of Sennecke. He didn’t even play centre in Liiga yet was drafted as one in the NHL, a big reason for the jump in the standings.

Slafkovsky is another that improved as the season went on. In fact, coaches dropped KK’s TOI in the playoffs from the regular season while Slaf was given more ice time.

Both KK and Slaf improved their draft stocks throughout the year, but to deny that it was international tournaments that got the hype machine into overdrive is being dishonest.
 

Deebs

Without you, everything falls apart
Feb 5, 2014
17,310
14,210
Like Iginla, Lindstrom sees himself more as a centre in the NHL, than a winger:

Malgré cela, Lindstrom, qui se voit davantage comme un centre qu’un ailier dans la LNH, est d’avis que l’aspect finesse de son jeu n’est pas suffisamment reconnu.

Lindstrom believes that the finesse side of his play, is not widely acknowledged.

He has a high compete level and what is also bound to draw attention is the type of aggressiveness and meanness he displays.

Unlike Iginla, LIndstrom has actually played Center :)

Would love to add him to the club. After watching him a few times this past season, he's just a presence on the ice. Big body and uses it well, great shot, excellent skating....kid has all the tools to take his game to the NHL and deliver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,607
44,324
Also regarding Dickinson - be careful with players in the CHL that are already built like men. He looks like he’s filled out early which is a big reason why he looks good, he’s just physically ahead of everyone else.

He actually seems like a great candidate to consider an AHL player exemption - allowing AHL teams to have one U20 CHL player on their team. I’m not sure what else he can really do in the OHL and you don’t necessarily want to rush him into the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenris

Pompeius Magnus

Registered User
May 18, 2014
20,885
18,533
Kanata ,ON
Also regarding Dickinson - be careful with players in the CHL that are already built like men. He looks like he’s filled out early which is a big reason why he looks good, he’s just physically ahead of everyone else.

He actually seems like a great candidate to consider an AHL player exemption - allowing AHL teams to have one U20 CHL player on their team. I’m not sure what else he can really do in the OHL and you don’t necessarily want to rush him into the NHL.
Yeah, he could probably play pro hockey as soon as next season and not look overmatched. He's definitely the type of prospect who could have gone to the AHL for his D+1 season a la Seider or Kulich, had he been drafted out of Europe. He was already a regular in London as a 16 year old, so he's got 2 legitimate full seasons in at the junior level already. His time is going to be sorta wasted in London next year, although getting more reps in is never a bad thing, obviously.
 
Last edited:

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,591
27,720
East Coast
Unlike Iginla, LIndstrom has actually played Center :)

Would love to add him to the club. After watching him a few times this past season, he's just a presence on the ice. Big body and uses it well, great shot, excellent skating....kid has all the tools to take his game to the NHL and deliver.

Iggy has played center bud. But he was moved to wing and that's when he took off.

Was Lindstrom playing center with the next prodigy on his wing? McKenna? When I watch video on Lindstrom, I see a power forward more than a center. His highlight reel lacks the vision/play making areas IMO. Lindstrom can speak to this all he wants but it's lacking. And I'm talking about how that translates to the NHL where there are also lots of big boys that skate well and time/space is reduced a hell of a lot more than the CHL.

Iggy to me is a play making winger who can score. Lindstrom to me is a power forward winger who can score.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,046
25,471
Iggy has played center bud. But he was moved to wing and that's when he took off.

Was Lindstrom playing center with the next prodigy on his wing? McKenna? When I watch video on Lindstrom, I see a power forward more than a center. His highlight reel lacks the vision/play making areas IMO. Lindstrom can speak to this all he wants but it's lacking. And I'm talking about how that translates to the NHL where there are also lots of big boys that skate well and time/space is reduced a hell of a lot more than the CHL.

Iggy to me is a play making winger who can score. Lindstrom to me is a power forward winger who can score.

Iggy to me is a play making winger who can score. Lindstrom to me is a power forward winger who can score.
That may be their styles, but what I'm most interested in is who is really good at what style they play. I've heard some question Lindstrom's hands. I don't remember who and I don't know if there's any merit to the perspective.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,607
44,324
Iggy has played center bud. But he was moved to wing and that's when he took off.

Was Lindstrom playing center with the next prodigy on his wing? McKenna? When I watch video on Lindstrom, I see a power forward more than a center. His highlight reel lacks the vision/play making areas IMO. Lindstrom can speak to this all he wants but it's lacking. And I'm talking about how that translates to the NHL where there are also lots of big boys that skate well and time/space is reduced a hell of a lot more than the CHL.

Iggy to me is a play making winger who can score. Lindstrom to me is a power forward winger who can score.
He’s not a centre. Watching him, he’s obviously not that type of player. You can say he was tried there, but they never kept him there in the CHL, so there’s no reason to think he’ll be that in the NHL. In his 115 WHL games, he only had 22 where he took 5+ faceoff attempts, which is quite a low barometer. And the majority were in the 2022-23 regular season when he was with Seattle and on the 3rd line. Kelowna never used him there other than when Szturc was out. The Rockets literally have one good centre on the roster yet still didn’t play Iginla there. He’s a winger.

Lindstrom literally lines up at centre every game and has done so throughout his entire WHL career minus his 6 game stint in 2021-22.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,591
27,720
East Coast
That may be their styles, but what I'm most interested in is who is really good at what style they play. I've heard some question Lindstrom's hands. I don't remember who and I don't know if there's any merit to the perspective.

I am one who has question marks on Lindstrom's hockey IQ and play making/vision/hands. I like the player and he is close in my BPA waive after Celebrini but when I play the nit pick game, I can see noticeable areas that need improvement.

He’s not a centre. Watching him, he’s obviously not that type of player. You can say he was tried there, but they never kept him there in the CHL, so there’s no reason to think he’ll be that in the NHL. In his 115 WHL games, he only had 22 where he took 5+ faceoff attempts, which is quite a low barometer. And the majority were in the 2022-23 regular season when he was with Seattle and on the 3rd line. Kelowna never used him there other than when Szturc was out. The Rockets literally have one good centre on the roster yet still didn’t play Iginla there. He’s a winger.

Lindstrom literally lines up at centre every game and has done so throughout his entire WHL career minus his 6 game stint in 2021-22.

Iggy was a center but he's moved to wing and it's the right spot for him. A play making winger with a great shot. Great all around game and size/weight.

Lindstrom has been a center yes and is a center in the CHL. Does that translate at the NHL level? Not sure about that bud. Look up Byfield. He hasn't played much center yet and was on Kopitar's line. I think Lindstrom may follow the same type of path and you hope he matures into a center. T Thompson is another good example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26Mats

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
41,607
44,324
I am one who has question marks on Lindstrom's hockey IQ and play making/vision/hands. I like the player and he is close in my BPA waive after Celebrini but when I play the nit pick game, I can see noticeable areas that need improvement.



Iggy was a center but he's moved to wing and it's the right spot for him. A play making winger with a great shot. Great all around game and size/weight.

Lindstrom has been a center yes and is a center in the CHL. Does that translate at the NHL level? Not sure about that bud. Look up Byfield. He hasn't played much center yet and was on Kopitar's line. I think Lindstrom may follow the same type of path and you hope he matures into a center. T Thompson is another good example.
First of all, Iginla isn’t a playmaking winger. I don’t understand how that’s your description of him.

Byfield isn’t an example of a prospect failing at being a centre, it’s an example of a team failing at development. Of course he’s been shifted to wing when the Kings have Kopitar, Danault and acquired PLD. That’s just hubris on their part thinking they had a contending team. It doesn’t mean Lindstrom should follow the same path.
 

Picaroon

Registered User
Apr 6, 2008
3,210
1,441
New Brunswick
I think the reason for that would be that if Anaheim switches with Montreal, and Montreal takes the forward CBJ wants, then CBJ could take the defenseman that Anaheim is targeting.

CBJ isn't going forward for sure, I would argue the defenseman at the top of the class are a bigger need for them.



I can't think of a single person who wanted McCarron in the 1st round.
Ya that's definitely one scenario. But I think a lot of teams have tiers of players rather than linear rankings. If ANA has 2-3 d-men in a tier, they may see the value in getting additional assets while staying in the same tier of d-men. Adding a guy like Struble (Verbeek type player) and a mid pick may worth more than the difference between Dickinson and Buium for example. Meanwhile Montreal would move up a clear forward tier.
 

Doublechin

Registered User
Jun 23, 2013
3,248
1,450
I think both Dickinson and Buium are the top 2 D’s in this draft. They are not getting passed the 7th overall if I try to play Nostradamus a bit.

Lev gets picked maybe the 2nd overall because of the RD premium and Silayev will get picked somewhere in there because of his size. It’s a hell of a year to be in the hunt for a Dman.
I agree with Dickinson and Buium as being the top 2, I can't lie and pretend that I've seen much of Silyaev however

But the closer we getting to the draft the more I seem to see Levshunov topping off as a Trouba type of Dman or even a Nurse type

Buium I think has the highest potential to be a high scoring Dman with high end ability while Dickinson I see as being the most complete and hardest worker of the bunch
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gustave

Hacketts

Registered User
Jul 12, 2018
1,681
3,172
First of all, Iginla isn’t a playmaking winger. I don’t understand how that’s your description of him.

Byfield isn’t an example of a prospect failing at being a centre, it’s an example of a team failing at development. Of course he’s been shifted to wing when the Kings have Kopitar, Danault and acquired PLD. That’s just hubris on their part thinking they had a contending team. It doesn’t mean Lindstrom should follow the same path.
and he ain't in the same universe as Kaprizov either. @Habs Halifax
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad