RationalExpectations
Registered User
- May 12, 2019
- 5,106
- 3,950
I disagree. KK had good Liiga stats (better than Slaf actually), he was also very good in Liiga, created space for his linemates, was showing great promise as a playmaker. This rhetoric needs to stop. He was top 20 already at the beginning of his D year and top 10 at time of the lottery, actually quite similar to the Sennecke story.The thing with KK is that the entire hype was created by a 7 game sample size at the U18. He was bad in the Liiga playoffs, he didn’t end his season very well.
Sennecke’s hype is based on his final ~40 games. He just continuously got stronger as the season went on.
I don’t think they are comparable. If we are talking the clumsy looking physicality, notice that Sennecke doesn’t actually fall. KK was called Bambi for a reason.
It does not mean Sennecke will fail to be a top line winger, but we need to stop with the KK revisionism…