2 NHL games at any point for a 62nd pick is above average. Relax man.Hutson has played what, 2 NHL games so far? And that's actually what you're using to prove how great this management is doing?
3rd and 4th line.. i agree..you need size...but in the first 2 lines you need talent even if you have 2 undersized players...Catton is more talented than Lindstrom..way more...you take him..
Hutson has played what, 2 NHL games so far? And that's actually what you're using to prove how great this management is doing?
2 NHL games at any point for a 62nd pick is above average. Relax man.
Talent and size is the ideal. That’s why we’re all so hopeful about Slaf. A shame Lindstrom’s back got all mangled. I wanted to see what he could do. On the flipside, I guess if he had a great year he wouldn’t be available to us.
I'm up to like 20 games of Sennecke now. I try so hard but I can't get over the posture, the fact he can't stop gliding, the way he looks like Benoit Pouliot effort level wise at times, the way pucks just float away from him despite his seemingly very good stick-handling and the way he seems to be mostly in the wrong spot often. It's tough because you see the talent, he's skilled, he's raw, he does have shifts where he works super hard, he has shifts where he pushes the play and flashes shot, hands, skating and passing but when you compare him with Lindstrom and Iginla I'm not sure I can see it and of course with Catton and Demidov it's just not the pick, we'd be reaching hard on size.
I'm also unsure what the use of picking a guy thats 6'3 if he stays 60 feet from the play 75% of the time. He's a project, but I think we probably should be past these projects at this point. The Habs need that elusive #3 forward to compiment Slaf and Suzuki and slide down CC to 4-5. I think all three of Iggy, Catton and Demidov are pretty much locks to be just that, why risk it, really ?
You might want to throw IQ into that equation as well...Talent and size are not dissociated.
Its foolish to ignore how big of an edge it gives when a player is stronger and bigger than his opponent.
You might want to throw IQ into that equation as well...
The most important skill is IQ.Talent and size are not dissociated.
Its foolish to ignore how big of an edge it gives when a player is stronger and bigger than his opponent.
The most important skill is IQ.
The best in history
..Gretzky had only that way above everybody...and he was skinny ant not strong at all.
Look at Kucherov as well.
Catton is way smarter than Lindstrom..not even close
Catton is better than Lindstrom
I'm glad someone else noticed him. I'm way much higher on him than the consensus since I have him as a 1st rounder. I understand it's risky to have him this high but he's one hell of a homerun pick if he ever reaches his potential.I know we have an absolute surplus at that position but...Tarin Smith would be a hell of a gamble with our 2nd.
This is oversimplifying things a lot.The most important skill is IQ.
The best in history
..Gretzky had only that way above everybody...and he was skinny ant not strong at all.
Look at Kucherov as well.
Catton is way smarter than Lindstrom..not even close
Catton is better than Lindstrom
He would be an excellent pick at 5, if Levshunov, Iginla, Lindstrom, Demidov, Dickinson, Parekh were not in this draftKeep it classy. Catton easily has Keller+ potential, which would be an excellent pick at 5.
He's definitely super raw. Almost a blank slate too, you can tell he hasn't been coached a whole lot in his young career, he tends to improvise a ton. A true project as far as development goes, a lot like Slaf was.I'm up to like 20 games of Sennecke now. I try so hard but I can't get over the posture, the fact he can't stop gliding, the way he looks like Benoit Pouliot effort level wise at times, the way pucks just float away from him despite his seemingly very good stick-handling and the way he seems to be mostly in the wrong spot often. It's tough because you see the talent, he's skilled, he's raw, he does have shifts where he works super hard, he has shifts where he pushes the play and flashes shot, hands, skating and passing but when you compare him with Lindstrom and Iginla I'm not sure I can see it and of course with Catton and Demidov it's just not the pick, we'd be reaching hard on size.
I'm also unsure what the use of picking a guy thats 6'3 if he stays 60 feet from the play 75% of the time. He's a project, but I think we probably should be past these projects at this point. The Habs need that elusive #3 forward to compiment Slaf and Suzuki and slide down CC to 4-5. I think all three of Iggy, Catton and Demidov are pretty much locks to be just that, why risk it, really ?
Ovechkin had 36 goals and 33 assists with Dynamo pre NHL…he turned out okWhat explains Lindstrom's more goals than assists? It's unheard of for a very good player in the NHL to have more Gs than As.
Eh I'd take him pretty comfortably ahead of everyone not named Demidov there.He would be an excellent pick at 5, if Levshunov, Iginla, Lindstrom, Demidov, Dickinson, Parekh were not in this draft
What explains Lindstrom's more goals than assists? It's unheard of for a very good player in the NHL to have more Gs than As.
He would be an excellent pick at 5, if Levshunov, Iginla, Lindstrom, Demidov, Dickinson, Parekh were not in this draft
Part of it is shooting 23%, higher than anyone else in the league with at least 20 goals.What explains Lindstrom's more goals than assists? It's unheard of for a very good player in the NHL to have more Gs than As.
Exactly. They all have so pros and cons, neither of them are a 100% sure shotI would pick all 3 of Lindstrom, Iginla and Demidov ahead of Sennecke but an honest intellectual debate have Sennecke in the same sphere of prospect as these guys.
Iginla is an easy, safe pick with intangibles. But Sennecke has clearly more upside, even tho the path to reach it appear less clear.
Lindstrom its the injuries. Demidov smallish winger, the MHL. Etc.
All have things going for them and things against them.
Alex Ovechkin’s a pretty good player. So’s Caufield. Some players like to shoot.What explains Lindstrom's more goals than assists? It's unheard of for a very good player in the NHL to have more Gs than As.
Anderson also has more Gs and As. We'd need more data, I wasn't even considering the sh% anomoly @SannywithoutCompy brought up but I don't want to get fixated against a prospect pre-draft any more. So won't be looking into it any further.Alex Ovechkin’s a pretty good player. So’s Caufield. Some players like to shoot.