Playmaker09
Registered User
- Sep 11, 2008
- 3,531
- 1,823
Iginla might be safer and that's the risk we run but haven't we been talking about swinging for fences? I still think the floor for Sennecke is fine as well. It's a swing I'm comfortable making if Lindstrom and Demidov are gone.
Safe doesn’t win you Cups. We don’t have the luxury of drafting generational players or having high profile free agents sign. After Demidov and Lindstrom, I don’t see any forwards with 70+ point potential available. Maybe Catton, but we are currently seeing what size brings a team in the playoffs, so what good is a Marner-lite? Sennecke maybe has that potential in an enticing physical package.
We took the gamble with Slafkovsky, he had the attitude to go with the skill and physicality. A lot will come down to the interviews. Does Sennecke want to improve, is he wired similarly to Slaf? If so, I can see why NHL teams would consider him this high.
That all depends on how you view Sennecke's upside.
Personally, I think his playmaking has been overrated and I don't see elite potential the same way I did for Pettersson for example.
Demidov has his own question marks, but I'm much more willing to take the risk on him given that I believe his upside is of a higher tier than Sennecke's. Same with Slaf.
I think the upside for Tij and Sennecke is similar, and so they fall into the same tier.
However, as Tij just needs less to go his way in order to hit that potential, I have him higher within that tier. That's how safety is weighed for me.
Regardless, neither are on my wishlist at 5.