Vachon23
Registered User
Shane Wright last yearI like to see where they start the year off, too. Like Cam Allen looked off and never recovered, Yager looked great but never really had the season we expected.
Shane Wright last yearI like to see where they start the year off, too. Like Cam Allen looked off and never recovered, Yager looked great but never really had the season we expected.
Shane Wright last year
True, since the u18 that year was with the full Team Canada players and the only ga,es played by most of those players, I got completely mix up. My badDon't think he played the Hlinka his draft year, did he?
Connelly is going to be a big riser
Don't think he played the Hlinka his draft year, did he?
Need to watch some footage on him. Would he put our offense over the top?Catton is unreal
Highly dynamic. He's a bit in the mold of a Brayden Point for me, as he can do pretty much everything offensively, with or without the puck. Doesn't have Eiserman's shot, but still deadly. Doesn't have Benson/Carlsson's passing, but still a high-end playmaker. Skating base is very solid, he's involved all over and apparently his character's great. I'm curious how much he'll produce this year, and this will influence his projection a lot.Need to watch some footage on him. Would he put our offense over the top?
What's good about this year is that we have way more chances of having a dynamic forward falling to us (assuming we're closer to 10) since there's plenty of really good Ds in this draft as well.
The question is: If a D is BPA, do we take him or do we reach for the next F?
Early early opinion after a couple Hlinka/WJSS games: there are some DYNAMIC forwards at the top. They may not be the biggest, but man these guys can skate, dangle and shoot. Most of them are fairly responsible defensively as well. Give me Celebrini, Eiserman, Helenius or Catton anyday of the week.
And I thought Eiserman coasted at times, while Celebrini was very much involved at the u18s! Good thing that there's still a long way to go and we have time to scout some more lmao.I've liked what i've seen from Eiserman, he's shown some jam and the shot is legit. Not knowing much about this draft class he would be my #1 target to hope for us yes I'm aware the Habs could end up picking outside the top 10 but maybe they don't and you never know how the lottery will play out.
Celebrini I wasn't as impressed with from watching him in the USHL this season but it was only 1 game. The coasting is a red flag of mine so I tend to not like these kinds of players as much but I need to see more games.
Helenius I didn't noticed too much of but thought he was ok, still have a few more games to watch though.
Catton I never heard of before
Hope Demidov or Catton falls to us if we pick top 5 or very close to it again.And I thought Eiserman coasted at times, while Celebrini was very much involved at the u18s! Good thing that there's still a long way to go and we have time to scout some more lmao.
What's interesting is that I see 5 (adding Demidov) quality forwards that would hypothetically fit our culture/style. Even though they have flaws, I think management would pick one of them if they had the chance.
We should suck plenty. St-Louis "system" is allowing goals at a crazy rate. Our #1 goalie is Montembault and we have no scoring depth after Suzuki/Caufield.Hope Demidov or Catton falls to us if we pick top 5 or very close to it again.
Detroit's pushing for the POs, Anaheim added vets and Arizona should be better than last year. Still a fair shot at top-5 imo.We should suck plenty. St-Louis "system" is allowing goals at a crazy rate. Our #1 goalie is Montembault and we have no scoring depth after Suzuki/Caufield.
Only problem is I see many other teams being real bad as well (Anaheim, SJ, Arizona, Detroit, Philadelphia, among others), so top 5 will be tough.
Detroit's pushing for the POs, Anaheim added vets and Arizona should be better than last year. Still a fair shot at top-5 imo.
Early on, how do you guys see the top quality in comparison to 2023? No Bedard obviously, but I'd think Celebrini, Eiserman and Demidov may all be in a similar tier as Fantilli, Carlsson and Michkov. Catton and Helenius I would say are close to Will Smith. For defensemen, I think Dickinson is top-3 worthy. Mews, Parekh and Jiricek are close to Reinbacher in quality; better offensively, but I don't see any of them being as sound all over the ice.
Anyway, lots to be played still, but it should be a very deep and talented top-10.
Catton and Dickinson continue to impress.
Dickinson is going high, he has everything to be a number 1 LD.
I mean, Eiserman's track record has been pretty impressive up to now, and a lot of people are mentionning Demidov as Michkov-level. To be fair, I'm ambiguous about the ultimate upside of these 3. Howeverz I see Catton as a way better prospect than Dvorsky even in D-1, and Dvorsky had a disappointing DY.I think Celebrini is alone in the Carlsson tier, Eiserman, Demidov Will Smith/Leonard tier, Catton more in the Dvorsky tier, Helenius in the Yager tier.
It's weaker than last year by a whole standard of deviation imo.
We won't get a draft like last year again for a few years, 2026 is a prospect to get there if McKenna shows Bedard-like qualities.
I mean, Eiserman's track record has been pretty impressive up to now, and a lot of people are mentionning Demidov as Michkov-level. To be fair, I'm ambiguous about the ultimate upside of these 3. Howeverz I see Catton as a way better prospect than Dvorsky even in D-1, and Dvorsky had a disappointing DY.
A lot of projection now, we'll see.
Yeah, it’s too soon now to really know where the players are gonna go but in my opinion Levshunov will probably be the first dman selected. Jiricek will rise in the rankings.At least he's giving Levshunov more respect with this ranking. Pronman had him going 7th I think.