So let me get this straight:
It is a fate accompli that ONLY Levshunov or Demidov wil lbe KD's choice at #2..
Demidov will be a guaranteed superstar ...maybe BOA of this drFt clas..but nobody says he s "Generationa"...
Concerns about his skating not tickibg KD's boc are ignored or brushed of as nothing to worry about...he is Not a burner.. he does not use hiscoutside edge well so hasxa wider skating stance to compensate which opens him up to easier physical take-outs by playersxatcthecpro level...so this would seem to be a problem for himat higher than a weak MHL...
We arexthusxexoectid to believe that KD will take him despite not ticking what hexoptinakkyxwabtsxin a pkayer.. thecskatibf..
So KD will ignore his vital must have in favourxofvpuckhandlibgcskilk,hockey I.Q. and high compete level even if there are skating flaws and speed issues?
So if on the other hand the skating issues with Demidov are facts JD cannot ignore he will fall back to the "safe" you know what you are getting Levshunov whose cekibgbusxa#1D but at least hevisxa safe certain 2RD and Hawks need more RD for team structure.
At minimum Hawkscget a dman lijelybonlyv1 season away from the lineup and insertion to 2Rzd muchibg big monutescalk situations....thevimoresdion conesvoff good but maybe not great ...but with pitential improvements maybe he can take over 1RD in future moving up from 2RD..
So I think there are questions with both candidates for #2.
Yet we getxakk tgsexcertaitiesxtgesexarexthecoblyv2 KD is considering.. No morectalk of Lindstrom because for sonecreason where there is usually big value coveted Big alk roubd cebters in combo with speed,other,size,physicality andc3cxobe play...in short physical power donibationat Cebter...greatxgoalvscorer with both shotcand in ckisexat themes...ticks so many boxes..and yet somehow this draft the usual covet for a donibatingbphysical prototypical Big Center is just tossed out the window because tge public and some professional rankibgvorgsxare more impressed with ranking Demidovvand Levshunov on whatever order ahead of the usual type coveted who does tick all the boxes and projects to an easy transition to pro hockey at that size speed and skill?
Tge Haws need such a Big Center with his combination of physicality and scoring ....Little Brdardcas a Center still presents problems defendivekyborxwhen handled by bigger NHL pkayers ...
So you would think Hawks need bigger stronger forwards mixed ibtobtopb2 lines ratger than add anotgercshrimo lije Denidiv into the top six forwards...
But Bedard needs more skilk to okay with and Denidiv is suck skilk,right.
Well one cannot haveceverything.
No pkayer does.. Neitger is anyone taking a Geberational Pkayerxat #2.
The fact is...nobody knows for sure which of thse 3 will have the best NHL career..
The we can get Big forward clater argument is ridiculous.. Big impact centers usually do not last past the first few picks.
I would stick with the covet Big Center prize when the opportunity to get one is there...Hawksxwill gavectovwait till a future draft to get onevofvthsexwith this rare combo of physical nasty,3 zone pay,physicakitycand Sizexand pierr,and great shot.
Sure hecneedsxtobwork on more creativity..butciffebaexaside from shot Akso cones from winnibg board battles and net front battles and re-pssesdions/take-aways in the o-zone whoch Lindstron will dominate at...
Fancy puck-handlers (daglers) can be exciting and electrifying...but ifvthey lose batykescto bigger syrongervplayersxat the highest level they will get pushedxaroubdxandxstymied..I woukdcratgercdovtgevpushingcaroubdcforca change.
I just cannot see a tio six having Bedard Denidov Kansterov Lardis Nazarxand No ore =all smaller forwards...no Big Cebter to match and shiydownnopps to linevorcto help smaller wingers by getting them the puck back index clearing more space for the little guys.
Hawksxwoukdchacecthecsmalkest (but skilled top six in the NHK)..woukdctgatxwork?
.I doubtbit.
If Hawks thought Demidovis notvtgecroght fit mduectivtgecsizexandcsjatingbissues then if tgey still want to go forward over d-man with #2,but think Lindstrom isctherec1 prc2vpicks laster then trade doen 1 orc2vspits and let other teams getcDenidiv and Levshunov..
Or trade down Yakemchuk for RD ...may have highercceiking than Levshunov ...
Tgevointbus..mif Denidiv and Levshunov so highly ranked on alk tgse lists,tgen other teansca few soits after #2will pay to mivevup .
What?No team from 3-7 would give sweetener ouckscto movevup ?
.in thatcxase it means Denidov and Kevshunov Realkycare not that great enough in value anyway...
By tgat logic if Hawjs stuck at #2tgey shoukd value Lindstrom ahead of anyonecekse for#2.
BOTHER should at least test tge trade down 1-2spots and still get Lindstrom or down to the Ottawa pick at #7 ...they may covet Lindstrknat #2but tgen you still get Yakemchuk at #7:and pock #25 ..
You coukdcthen package #18 and #25 to NJ for #10..
Y ou woul then take Swnnecke at #10
Thus is how you get yourxsjilk pkayercto pkay with Bedard*butvhecalsobhas size) abd you getvyourx2RDcwoth 1D oitebtial anyway.
My strategies are better than takibg eitger Levshunov or Denidiv at #2..based on dubious BPA rankings which may never pan out as expected..