Ouroboros
There is no armour against Fate
- Feb 3, 2008
- 15,900
- 11,847
First six were Celebrini, Levhsunov, Silayev, Lindstrom, Demidov, Buium.I mean, I'd be happy with that depending on who else was available at 7
First six were Celebrini, Levhsunov, Silayev, Lindstrom, Demidov, Buium.I mean, I'd be happy with that depending on who else was available at 7
Yeah, I'm good with Sennecke then.First six were Celebrini, Levhsunov, Silayev, Lindstrom, Demidov, Buium.
We could do very much worse... I'd be happy with this.New Pronman mock just dropped...
You love to see it.
Would anyone do
7
for
14 + 33 + 42 from the sharks?
That’s one I would think long and hard about, because I’m looking at Solberg above Parekh and Yakemchuk.Would anyone do
7
for
14 + 33 + 42 from the sharks?
For me 14 guarantees us one of these 14 guys below:I'd stick with the quality over quantity. 14 is outside the range I would move down to.
For me 14 guarantees us one of these 14 guys below:
Macklin, demidov, levshunov, buium, silayev, dickinson, parekh, yakemchuk, iginla, catton, lindstrom, Eiserman, sennecke, helenius
For me that feels to be right where the tier drops off at 15, but obviously 7 gets you better than 14. I would probably do it to add two early 2nds.
I get that, and i do think theres a noteworthy difference betweent he guy at 7 and the guy at 14.I'm not a big fan of that late first, early 2nd range, so I'd rather keep 7 and take someone we're really targeting, versus taking whatever's left.
Probably but I wouldn't feel great about it, so it's likely a fair trade.Would anyone do
7
for
14 + 33 + 42 from the sharks?
When they are at 6 and they don't love who is at 7 its worth thinking about.Would anyone do
7
for
14 + 33 + 42 from the sharks?
You said Iginla #2 above Celebrini at #3, big guy. You even went on to add you'd personally take Iginla first overall.People were laughing when I posted - Iginla number 3 overall, one month ago.
Despite all the good defensemen available in this draft, the top three picks might very well be all forwards.
You sure it wasn’t because Celebrini was third.People were laughing when I posted - Iginla number 3 overall, one month ago.
I hope andlauer is lobbying the league to overturn the stupid decision on Daddy's paperwork error.I know we need a big fish, but our line of prospects are so thin because of poor asset management, that it would be nice to acquire a few other picks here.
I'm not happy with Boucher, but at least we used it on a player. The DBC and chychrun ones were so unnecessary but, again, we got something out of it (but significant worse than where we could be). The Vegas situation is the cherry and it f***s us up.
Because it had nothing to do with him having a NTC, it had to do with Vegas and the NHL being told that the NTC was null and void because it wasn't submitted by Dadonov on an official trade call. It was an Ottawa mistake, not an NHL mistakeI hope andlauer is lobbying the league to overturn the stupid decision on Daddy's paperwork error.
Bullshit that no one in the Knights org knew he had an NTC. Most of us here knew about it. Why is there no responsibility on them to do basic f***ing research that anyone with access to capfriendly could do?
Either just overturn it or compensate the knights with a new #33 pick they create out of thin air. Vegas should be happy they get that rather than an investigation into whether they knew about the NTC and sketchily tried to f*** over dadonov by feigning ignorance and trading him anyways.
Or even better. Maybe the NHL should grow up and take basic responsibility for not having the safeguards in place to stop amateur hour paperwork mistakes like this from happening.