I don't think there is anyway for certain to know if Anderson would be willing to re-sign in Winnipeg. He is 1 1/2 years out so he can't re-sign yet. Chevy would have to trade for him based on 1 1/2 years of service and hope he likes it in Winnipeg. He only has a 6 team no trade list, so maybe Winnipeg isn't on it.
Swap Heinola for Salo and I think that's probably a deal that Calgary considers. They will get significantly better offers than 1st Yager Heinola. It's a massive risk that you make that move and he doesn't resign. Likely this is an offseason move when you can at least discuss the possibility of an extension with the player.
I look at who will be helping sooner and that’s Lambert He’s likely moving up next year where as Yager is a few years away.Wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole. Not for Salo.
I don't offer Yager either. I get your point but I think Yager has a better chance of hitting. I would add to my offer of Lambert + Pionk + 1st. Add Heinola. Maybe more. But not either Salo or Yager.
Wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole. Not for Salo.
I don't offer Yager either. I get your point but I think Yager has a better chance of hitting. I would add to my offer of Lambert + Pionk + 1st. Add Heinola. Maybe more. But not either Salo or Yager.
I look at who will be helping sooner and that’s Lambert He’s likely moving up next year where as Yager is a few years away.
We have a window we are working with and we need to work within that timeline.
Yes we will need prospects for after, but adding Andersson is a huge plus on our back end, and fills a hole we’ve had for a few years.
I’d do 1st+Yager+Heinola, and would add as needed, but I wouldn’t add Salo and I’d try to keep Pionk for the remainder of the season…if possible. Grab Dumoulin from ANA and run…
Morrissey - Andersson
Samberg - Pionk
Dumoulin - DeMelo
Getting Andersson also gives Chevy the ability to focus solely on getting a top 6C if Lambert doesn’t work out, or flushing out the bottom 3 if he does.
Maybe offer Ehlers+ (Pionk) for JT Miller (+)
Agreed. I don't think Chevy should consider trading either Yager or Salo, unless they are part of a deal for a long term solution at #2 center or top pairing RHD as they represent our best internal options to fill those 2 roles.Wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole. Not for Salo.
I don't offer Yager either. I get your point but I think Yager has a better chance of hitting. I would add to my offer of Lambert + Pionk + 1st. Add Heinola. Maybe more. But not either Salo or Yager.
He heard that Winnipeg was interestedParty pooper
Like Necas?He heard that Winnipeg was interested
I think Calgary needs a C coming back from what their fans have been saying, unless the flames think they can turn Cole into a center I'm not sure if they'd go for thatI don't like trading Lambert until we know what's happening with Ehlers.
But if Ehlers extended, I'd do something around Perfetti for Andersson.
I don’t think Perfetti gets it done for Andersson. He is now pretty much a winger and another fan base will see him as a 50 point winger which gets you nowhere near a top pairing RHD.I think Calgary needs a C coming back from what their fans have been saying, unless the flames think they can turn Cole into a center I'm not sure if they'd go for that
I mean Colorado got lehkonen for baron.I don’t think Perfetti gets it done for Andersson. He is now pretty much a winger and another fan base will see him as a 50 point winger which gets you nowhere near a top pairing RHD.
Who is the top pair rd in this example?I mean Colorado got lehkonen for baron.
Who is the top pair rd in this example?
Hockey newsWho the f*** is Carter Brooks?
I don’t think Perfetti gets it done for Andersson. He is now pretty much a winger and another fan base will see him as a 50 point winger which gets you nowhere near a top pairing RHD.
I do not see Petterson being a playoff 2CJets need to pull off their version of the Eichel trade and go all in for Petterson. Lambert + Ehlers + 1st + Heinola/Stanley. Then you go out and get a depth 5/6 depth D to replace Stan/Heinola. VAN might also want Perfetti instead of Ehlers which I'd also do. Stop throwing assets every year at trying to fix the quality Center depth issue and set it up for the remainder of Helley/Scheif deals
Agreed 100%. I think Granlund + Risto are still my favourite options for realistic acquisitions. Granlund has been a 60/70 point guy since joining the sharks and plays fast, while Risto is a giant who can clear the crease and has decent puck skills. Both seem like great fits for the lineup and our personnelKeeping Ehlers while he appears to play top 6 with Lowry on his line and Jets in first place seems like a go-for-it situation, one I haven’t seen in my 74 years.
The city could use a Cup. I’d rather see some of our “promising” projects sold off to acquire a legit 2-C.
Chevy can pull rabbits out of a hat at any time, and players performing with chemistry with even one other linemate are not worth losing at this stage. Ehlers’ top end is still higher than what we’ve seen and attendance will not drop this season as long as he’s clicking. In Chevy magic with trading unproven depth I place my trust, faith and hope. Spend on getting a 2-C.