Flyerfan4life
Registered User
but #culture.....The very definition of quitting. Not even trying to max out talent.
but #culture.....The very definition of quitting. Not even trying to max out talent.
90% of gamblers quit before they hit it bigI keep saying we're a couple good lottery tickets away from me hiring you to run this damn place, I just haven't hit the big jackpot yet.
Yeah, God forbid having Deslauriers on the 4th line instead of the Gerry Mayhews of the world.Well for starters, stop signing face punchers for four years to fill out your roster.
Strawman.Yeah, God forbid having Deslauriers on the 4th line instead of the Gerry Mayhews of the world.
90% of gamblers are QUITTERS.90% of gamblers quit before they hit it big
You're welcome to cite examples of the cheap 4th line skill players that all 32 NHL teams should be rounding out their rosters with.Strawman.
90% of gamblers are QUITTERS.
They have players on their AHL team at this exact moment who are statistically vastly superior to Deslauriers, like Lyksell.You're welcome to cite examples of the cheap 4th line skill players that all 32 NHL teams should be rounding out their rosters with.
The Flyers are 8-18 in Lycksell's 26 career NHL games, in which he has 6 points. What a difference maker.They have players on their AHL team at this exact moment who are statistically vastly superior to Deslauriers, like Lyksell.
Or are you trying to say it is literally impossible to find a better 4th liner than Nicky Fists?
Now post Deslauriers' stats.The Flyers are 8-18 in Lycksell's 26 career NHL games, in which he has 6 points. What a difference maker.
Richard already makes Delo more unnecessary than he was beforeNow post Deslauriers' stats.
Also, you didn't answer my question: do you think there are no better players available to replace Deslauriers?
I don't think replacing Deslauriers on the 4th line with the Lycksells and Mayhews of the world means jack.Also, you didn't answer my question: do you think there are no better players available to replace Deslauriers?
The Flyers are 8-18 in Lycksell's 26 career NHL games, in which he has 6 points. What a difference maker.
1) I disagree there are only "marginal" upgrades available to absolute dusters like Deslauriers across the leagueI don't think replacing Deslauriers on the 4th line with the Lycksells and Mayhews of the world means jack.
And it always amuses me how many fans beat on the bottom-of-the-lineup players as their whipping boys, as if the difference between Deslauriers and Lycksell on the 4th line, or Erik Johnson and Helge Grans as the 6 or 7, are the crux of why they're struggling.
1) I disagree there are only "marginal" upgrades available to absolute dusters like Deslauriers across the league
2) Even if there were only marginal upgrades, why wouldn't you want to make them? "Can't make big improvements so I'd rather make no improvements at all" is an incredibly stupid philosophy for building a competitive roster.
If he replaced Delo the minutes would be different all around. I don't understand how that's hard to figure out.DeLo has played 7 of 19 games, averaging 6:05 minutes a game.
I think that is a step below "fourth line."
Lycksell would replace Richard or Foerster.
You know this isn’t how things work. Why pretend that it is?DeLo has played 7 of 19 games, averaging 6:05 minutes a game.
I think that is a step below "fourth line."
Lycksell would replace Richard or Foerster.
You know this isn’t how things work. Why pretend that it is?
Why bother doing anything ever. Weird how the only thing they ever think we should do is exactly what the Flyers did.For years that has been the excuse used to defend management.
You can't easily get top-6 fowards for your 4th line. So why bother upgrading them? Checkmate
I like the one where a 27 year old in his 9th season isn't enough of a vet... he needs to be over 30 which means year 11!Because there is nothing he will not say or do to defend the team.
In another thread he is pretending Frost and Couturier are comparable because they are top six players. That's it. That's the whole reasoning.
Yes. They'd take minutes away from other prospects.If he replaced Delo the minutes would be different all around. I don't understand how that's hard to figure out.
See that's not the way it works. You take minutes from vets 1-2 minutes a game here and there and get that for the prospects.Yes. They'd take minutes away from other prospects.
And Lycksell would play 10 minutes a night instead of 20.
Right now they have more than enough wings, including a number of centers who should move to wing. Calling up another wing from LHV just means shuffling players around.
The problem is LHV has no NHL caliber centers.
And they've already called up any NHL caliber D-men, unless you're eager to see Ginning and McDonald.
Well, let's see. We have people asserting that these marginal bottom-of-the-lineup decisions are so important. So, yeah, wins and losses with these allegedly better options in the lineup are relevant, no?Oh you're actually going with team wins again, after your Hagg humiliation? Really?
You really learned nothing from that experience?