Flyerfan4life
Registered User
cuz he doesnt want to.. its all about being on the opposite side regardless of the topicIf he replaced Delo the minutes would be different all around. I don't understand how that's hard to figure out.
cuz he doesnt want to.. its all about being on the opposite side regardless of the topicIf he replaced Delo the minutes would be different all around. I don't understand how that's hard to figure out.
We got a coach joking that he might have to play Sanheim 40+ minutes to get him on PP1 because he is play 30+ now...Well, let's see. We have people asserting that these marginal bottom-of-the-lineup decisions are so important. So, yeah, wins and losses with these allegedly better options in the lineup are relevant, no?
Well, let's see. We have people asserting that these marginal bottom-of-the-lineup decisions are so important. So, yeah, wins and losses with these allegedly better options in the lineup are relevant, no?
Strawman.Well, let's see. We have people asserting that these marginal bottom-of-the-lineup decisions are so important.
Sounds like someone never heard of the 1% philosophy/principle of marginal gains.1) I disagree there are only "marginal" upgrades available to absolute dusters like Deslauriers across the league
2) Even if there were only marginal upgrades, why wouldn't you want to make them? "Can't make big improvements so I'd rather make no improvements at all" is an incredibly stupid philosophy for building a competitive roster.
In what world does Delo give you that?
Delo doesn't play. I mean 42 minutes in 19 games?
Really, you can't find something more pertinent to whine about?
They know Delo and Johnson can't play, they're bodies at the end of the roster.
When they bring players up, they try to give them 10+ at forward and 15+ minutes on defense.
Grans 16:11 (1g), Andrae 16:01 (10g)
Lucanko 11:22 (4g), Richard 10:31 (6g)
Meanwhile
Johnson 11:12, Hathaway 9:47, DeLo 6:03
You don’t give a 31 year body that can’t play a four year contract At 1.75 mil a year.Delo doesn't play. I mean 42 minutes in 19 games?
Really, you can't find something more pertinent to whine about?
They know Delo and Johnson can't play, they're bodies at the end of the roster.
When they bring players up, they try to give them 10+ at forward and 15+ minutes on defense.
Grans 16:11 (1g), Andrae 16:01 (10g)
Lucanko 11:22 (4g), Richard 10:31 (6g)
Meanwhile
Johnson 11:12, Hathaway 9:47, DeLo 6:03
Don’t tell me you drive a Found On Road DeadNothing associated with Chevy's power steering systems can be called reliable.
For blank's sake, the guys playing 6-10 minutes per game, and the guys who are the 6th or 7th defensemen, AREN'T WHY YOU ARE WINNING OR LOSING.
These are the end of lineup fill-ins. Stop caring about Deslauriers playing over Lycksell for 6-10 minutes, when Lycksell is 8-18 when he plays with maybe 6 points every 26 games instead of 4 points every 26 games for D-lo in those minutes. And maybe some guys feel more comfortable with D-lo and there's a fringe benefit?
It's just ridiculous when people complain about the fringes of the lineups, then offer no solutions, and then when they finally utter a guy, like Lycksell, the record with him in the lineup shows he makes no difference. Maybe even worse.
Strawman.For blank's sake, the guys playing 6-10 minutes per game, and the guys who are the 6th or 7th defensemen, AREN'T WHY YOU ARE WINNING OR LOSING.
Yeah, no one’s saying that and you know that.For blank's sake, the guys playing 6-10 minutes per game, and the guys who are the 6th or 7th defensemen, AREN'T WHY YOU ARE WINNING OR LOSING.
These are the end of lineup fill-ins. Stop caring about Deslauriers playing over Lycksell for 6-10 minutes, when Lycksell is 8-18 when he plays with maybe 6 points every 26 games instead of 4 points every 26 games for D-lo in those minutes. And maybe some guys feel more comfortable with D-lo and there's a fringe benefit?
It's just ridiculous when people complain about the fringes of the lineups, then offer no solutions, and then when they finally utter a guy, like Lycksell, the record with him in the lineup shows he makes no difference. Maybe even worse.
Having shitty bottom pairing defensemen was a contributing factor in why the Flyers didn't bring home a winnable Cup in 2010.For blank's sake, the guys playing 6-10 minutes per game, and the guys who are the 6th or 7th defensemen, AREN'T WHY YOU ARE WINNING OR LOSING.
These are the end of lineup fill-ins. Stop caring about Deslauriers playing over Lycksell for 6-10 minutes, when Lycksell is 8-18 when he plays with maybe 6 points every 26 games instead of 4 points every 26 games for D-lo in those minutes. And maybe some guys feel more comfortable with D-lo and there's a fringe benefit?
It's just ridiculous when people complain about the fringes of the lineups, then offer no solutions, and then when they finally utter a guy, like Lycksell, the record with him in the lineup shows he makes no difference. Maybe even worse.