Arthuros
Registered Snoozer
I have absolutely no issues with a 3 headed monster down the middle like the Pens did in the late 2000s.
Speculation: 2024-25 - Free Agency/Trade Thread
- Thread starter All Mighty
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
91Fedorov
John (Gibson) 3:16
- Dec 30, 2013
- 1,447
- 1,175
Honestly, if Carlsson hasn't broken a point per game yet, I doubt he ever will. It's hard to call one of our prospects a bust, but if it walks like a duck...Yup, let’s do a Double-dip rebuild. Trade Terry, Z and McT and build around Carlsson and Sennecke.
Rebuild around Sennecke and Solberg. 2032 that cup is ours!
The only buffalo plan I want to see is me eating Buffalo wings before the game at Honda Center with a nice Hazy IPA to wash it down.
KelVarnsen
Registered User
We can call it a “reset” of the rebuild.Yup, let’s do a Double-dip rebuild. Trade Terry, Z and McT and build around Carlsson and Sennecke.
ZegrassyKnoll
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2016
- 1,076
- 1,848
I think most people are totally fine with that. The salary cap might not be as cool with it, though.
Arthuros
Registered Snoozer
Eh, you let the cards fall where they may once a Cup is won.
I also feel like situations like Toronto where all of their top forwards are demanding market value is in part because they haven't won together. You win one, who knows? Maybe all of them take just a tiny hometown discount to keep the band together. Staal stuck on for a few years after the Cup, and the Pens were a Cup contender for those years.
Anyway. All good to fantasize.
Max contracts are fine as long as it's spent on studs, not dudes more worried that their purse matches their shoes for after the game.
CrazyDuck4u
Registered User
- Oct 14, 2006
- 7,595
- 4,727
Now you know why no free agent wants to come here. Fk that
gunnergunther
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 831
- 935
almost 40% of that is federal. Outside of the no tax states, youre only looking at a 3-10% difference. Not to mentions its only for half their games, and most of the guys that would make a difference are accumulating generational wealth on these contracts.
The main reason guys dont want to come here is because we suck, and its not a traditional market.
When the team was actually good we had some of the best players in the league putting us on their shortlist of preferred teams.
Bad teams have to overpay and/or are avoided by real talent if they have a choice.
Bad teams have to overpay and/or are avoided by real talent if they have a choice.
Dr Johnny Fever
RIP Grizzly 399
Trotz makes a very good case that winners want to win and it's the 2nd and 3rd tier players who are more interesting squeezing out the last dollar.
www.tsn.ca
Trotz on no tax states: ‘There’s no questions it’s an advantage’ - Video - TSN
Bryan Hayes, Dave Feschuk and Al’s Brother are joined by Nashville Predators general manager Barry Trotz to discuss where the no state tax advantage comes into play when luring free agents to your team.
www.tsn.ca
Boo Boo
Registered User
- Jan 31, 2013
- 2,574
- 2,944
Am I supposed to feel bad for him or something?
MMC
Global Moderator
As I myself am thinking I am likely leaving this state once I am done with university because the cost of living and taxes here are outrageous, I can't blame any athlete for also wanting to avoid this state for similar reasons
dracom
Registered User
yeah, boo hoo poor guy is only making 200k a game. how can they live off that!?
IDK if you dont pay taxes, but less then 11% of that is CA state tax, and they only pay state tax when the game is in the state. Which means teams in states with no tax only dont pay taxes when they are home games (or in another tax free state).
For the record the Preds play 6 away games in tax free states.
So they save barely half the amount they would pay in state income tax. Which means we are talking around a 6% difference in income.
Last edited:
AngelDuck
Rak 'em up
- Jun 16, 2012
- 24,067
- 18,901
Agreed. Go f*** anyone who blames anyone for not chasing the bag. That’s what our capitalistic society created - right or wrong
AngelDuck
Rak 'em up
- Jun 16, 2012
- 24,067
- 18,901
6% is 6%. You can act like it’s nothing all you want, but it isn’t. No one is saying it’s the main reason high profile players don’t come here. But it IS one of many factors
I think housing costs possibly play just as big a role as taxes. These guys must have toxic sticker shock when they see a house in a moderately upscale neighborhood is going to cost $2-3 million at least.
And I still maintain that for older players (i.e. 28 and above), excessive travel is increasingly unappealing to them.
And I still maintain that for older players (i.e. 28 and above), excessive travel is increasingly unappealing to them.
Tony O
Registered User
- May 31, 2011
- 264
- 109
Not everyone can do his job, and good for him making that much. I'd bet anyone here on this board would feel the same if the tax man took that much of your paycheck. We should all aspire.
It is more expensive in California, because there is much more to offer then other states. It is worth the extra cost IMO. If the higher cost plays a negative role in the decision, so be it. I doubt it is the ONLY thing making the decision, and if it is, then I dont think we want the guy.
GreatBear
Registered User
I went round and round with a friend in Georgia on this. I had to work the numbers and even then he had trouble believing me. But due to the difference in income tax structure, a married couple paid more state income tax in Georgia than California until their taxable income exceeded $150,000 per year. The difference was that Georgia had a flat tax rate in excess of $10,000 per year income whereas California has a progressive tax rate, where the initial tax bracket starts well above $10,000 per year. The sales tax and property tax rates were not significantly different between the two states.
So for regular earners do not just assume that California taxes are high, or even higher than in other states. Check everything in the tax structure carefully, and you might be surprised.
Now, California does have higher property values. That may impact the cost of living. But then you don’t need heavy winter clothes, and you don’t need to winterize either your car or your house. So put a lot of effort into calculating the true cost of living in comparable areas.
Reveille1984
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2014
- 991
- 665
I've found that generally the more that people complain about taxes, the less they actually understand them. I used to work with a guy who would constantly say he wouldn't want a raise if it were offered, because it would put him in a higher tax bracket and he would actually make less money. Eventually you just change the subject and move on.
70sSanO
Registered User
While California taxes are high, and I do think our state leaders waste too much of our dollars, every state gets what it needs. Or they cut back on services.
If a state has no income tax, they are getting it from property, sales, or anywhere else.
For players it is moot since most are not long term residents. But for CA residents, especially long term, Prop 13 keeps property tax increases in check.
Most states re-assess based on current value. For long term residents they pay on an unrealized monetary increase in their home value.
John
If a state has no income tax, they are getting it from property, sales, or anywhere else.
For players it is moot since most are not long term residents. But for CA residents, especially long term, Prop 13 keeps property tax increases in check.
Most states re-assess based on current value. For long term residents they pay on an unrealized monetary increase in their home value.
John
Terry Yake
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2013
- 29,217
- 17,936
if taxes were the main reason players didn't want to sign here, they wouldn't be signing in LA or SJ either. but those teams don't seem to be having trouble signing guys. the ducks also didn't have trouble signing players during the 2010s when they were winning the division every season
the reality is that the ducks suck and no one wants to play for a losing team with an uncertain future. once this team is a winner again, that'll change
the reality is that the ducks suck and no one wants to play for a losing team with an uncertain future. once this team is a winner again, that'll change
Sniperberg
Registered User
- Mar 30, 2017
- 812
- 1,536
I just dont understand how the Kings have been able to sign so many FA's these last couple of years when taxes are so high in California.
Are they doing something illegal or what?
Are they doing something illegal or what?
