Speculation: 2024-25 - Free Agency/Trade Thread

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t get why you guys want him so bad, he’s a pending UFA and this team already has enough bodies on D
I think it is just to get another veteran RHD who can reduce the playing time of guys like Zellweger and LaCombe. Provide more stability if nothing else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckRogers10
I don’t get why you guys want him so bad, he’s a pending UFA and this team already has enough bodies on D

Yeah there's a bit of a catch 22 there. I think the appeal is potentially being able to buy low on a decent RHD, but how do you even navigate that if he does play well? Seems a bit risky to take a guy off waivers and then end up giving him an extension of much value. Could end up right back on the wire next year.

I'm all for taking chances on young(ish) players with upside when they hit waivers, but for our purposes I think they have to be under RFA control and probably in the u25 range. Fabbro is 26, probably is what he is by now
 
Yeah there's a bit of a catch 22 there. I think the appeal is potentially being able to buy low on a decent RHD, but how do you even navigate that if he does play well? Seems a bit risky to take a guy off waivers and then end up giving him an extension of much value. Could end up right back on the wire next year.

I'm all for taking chances on young(ish) players with upside when they hit waivers, but for our purposes I think they have to be under RFA control and probably in the u25 range. Fabbro is 26, probably is what he is by now

Agreed. If the Ducks are adding on defense, it should be for a stable vet. Players struggling to make a lineup are a lot of this team and they don't need to add another in that category.
 
This is the kind of guy you have to take a chance on if you are a bottom-3 team like us. Think he doesnt pass SJ or the sexual assault-enthusiasts in Chicago but you never know.
 
I think we trade for Jiricek at some point.

Seems even more likely after the Fabbro claim.

Have to think it’s like the drysdale trade
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad