Speculation: 2024-25 - Free Agency/Trade Thread

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,002
17,383
Worst Case, Ontario
I don’t get why you guys want him so bad, he’s a pending UFA and this team already has enough bodies on D

Yeah there's a bit of a catch 22 there. I think the appeal is potentially being able to buy low on a decent RHD, but how do you even navigate that if he does play well? Seems a bit risky to take a guy off waivers and then end up giving him an extension of much value. Could end up right back on the wire next year.

I'm all for taking chances on young(ish) players with upside when they hit waivers, but for our purposes I think they have to be under RFA control and probably in the u25 range. Fabbro is 26, probably is what he is by now
 

Hey234

Registered User
Sponsor
May 7, 2010
880
1,252
Southern California
Yeah there's a bit of a catch 22 there. I think the appeal is potentially being able to buy low on a decent RHD, but how do you even navigate that if he does play well? Seems a bit risky to take a guy off waivers and then end up giving him an extension of much value. Could end up right back on the wire next year.

I'm all for taking chances on young(ish) players with upside when they hit waivers, but for our purposes I think they have to be under RFA control and probably in the u25 range. Fabbro is 26, probably is what he is by now

Agreed. If the Ducks are adding on defense, it should be for a stable vet. Players struggling to make a lineup are a lot of this team and they don't need to add another in that category.
 

Sniperberg

Registered User
Mar 30, 2017
792
1,477
This is the kind of guy you have to take a chance on if you are a bottom-3 team like us. Think he doesnt pass SJ or the sexual assault-enthusiasts in Chicago but you never know.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad