Rumor: 2024-2025 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Talk | The Slow Crawl to the Season

Tommy Shelby

Registered User
Feb 26, 2012
7,993
5,875
Buffalo is at the point where they need to package prospects for proven NHLers, like they did with the McLeod trade. They have an abundance of prospects
 
  • Like
Reactions: Murzu

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
48,430
31,847
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Buffalo is at the point where they need to package prospects for proven NHLers, like they did with the McLeod trade. They have an abundance of prospects
Peterka, Quinn, Levi, and Benson are all due new contracts either this summer or in 2026, and they already committed huge money and term to Dahlin, Thompson, Cozens, and Power. Luukkonen also has quite a bit of term left at a not-small cap hit, so they gotta be careful. Of course they also have to decide on some veterans they already have.

Personally if I could find a way to get a decent return on Power's contract with no retention, I'd do it, and I'd do it before I move Byram. Just get out of that contract because I don't think he'll live up to it at all. Then again the organization appears to be souring on Jokiharju and Samuelsson.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,145
53,744
Buffalo needs to quit the BPA thing and build a team. In no world does having 4LD like Dahlin, Power, Samuelsson and Byram make sense... makes even less sense with Johnson and Novikov in the minors and close as LD as well. Then their whole abundance of skilled players and not enough 2 way, higher IQ guys.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,742
57,515
Peterka, Quinn, Levi, and Benson are all due new contracts either this summer or in 2026, and they already committed huge money and term to Dahlin, Thompson, Cozens, and Power. Luukkonen also has quite a bit of term left at a not-small cap hit, so they gotta be careful. Of course they also have to decide on some veterans they already have.

Personally if I could find a way to get a decent return on Power's contract with no retention, I'd do it, and I'd do it before I move Byram. Just get out of that contract because I don't think he'll live up to it at all. Then again the organization appears to be souring on Jokiharju and Samuelsson.
The player they need is Mikko Rantanen to play on Tage's wing.

Buffalo needs to quit the BPA thing and build a team. In no world does having 4LD like Dahlin, Power, Samuelsson and Byram make sense... makes even less sense with Johnson and Novikov in the minors and close as LD as well. Then their whole abundance of skilled players and not enough 2 way, higher IQ guys.
Marner it is.
 

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
34,173
25,392
We should make a deal with Buffalo. Send Girard + for Byram. Bo wanted to be a top pair d-man so Bednar can put him with Cale and Toews on 2nd pair with Manson
 

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
34,173
25,392
Why would we want to trade for a guy that Makar would have to babysit?
What do you mean babysit? Supposedly Byram wanted to play on top pair, but back then Bednar wasn’t splitting the Toews Makar pairing. Now often Bednar puts Girard with Cale and Toews with Manson, so I was thinking that it would have been nice to have Byram play top pair instead of Girard
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alienblood

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,294
26,557
What do you mean babysit? Supposedly Byram wanted to play on top pair, but back then Bednar wasn’t splitting the Toews and Makar pairing. Now often Bednar puts Girard with Cale and Toews with Manson, so I was thinking that it would have been nice to have Byram play top pair instead of Girard
Makar would have to deal with all the mistakes Bo makes while Bo free wheels all aggressively. Aka babysit.
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
26,783
10,881
Michigan
Why would we want to trade for a guy that Makar would have to babysit?

Yeah, if you were going to try to upgrade on without spending more. You don’t go get Byram lol.

Our top four might be flawed, but it's working. Get Sam2 a more reliable partner.

I think Malinski has earned the #5 slot. Get him an appropriate partner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cinchronicity

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
26,783
10,881
Michigan
What do you mean babysit? Supposedly Byram wanted to play on top pair, but back then Bednar wasn’t splitting the Toews Makar pairing. Now often Bednar puts Girard with Cale and Toews with Manson, so I was thinking that it would have been nice to have Byram play top pair instead of Girard

That's because Toews hasn't been the best defensive option at times. Unfortunately

Byram wouldn't either, not until he's calmed down and figures out hes better off playing defense.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad