- Apr 25, 2006
- 53,371
- 59,028
if it was the difference between the deal happening and not..... shrug.Looking at Capwages...
This feels so unnecessary and kinda hurts us.
It's not like the Sharks needed 476k of cap space ffs.
When you have the worst goalie in the league you do what you gotta do to get rid of him.Looking at Capwages...
This feels so unnecessary and kinda hurts us.
It's not like the Sharks needed 476k of cap space ffs.
I'm not blaming the Avs if they didn't have a choice, I'm blaming the Sharks for making this mandatory when they have tons of cap space that they aren't going to use. It's just so ownership can save 450k.When you have the worst goalie in the league you do what you gotta do to get rid of him.
Bernstein and Pagnotta are definitely plugged in despite the fact that people hate Pagnotta.On NHL radio they briefly said the Avs might be interested in ROR. I forget who was talking though. No body too plugged in
Who is Ryder Balzac?if it was the difference between the deal happening and not..... shrug.
it was obviously important to the sharks for whatever reason.
my heart can't handle another blockbuster
I liked it when he let it slip out that he gets attracted to players.CMac said he’s gonna look to improve the team, so he’s not done. I loved hearing that
And now y'all are comparing Jack Drury to Ryan Gosling? 8 year extension upcoming once CMac's priapism goes away.I liked it when he let it slip out that he gets attracted to players.
Yep play Necas next to Mac and Drou and figure out how to get a good 2C.
CMac said he’s gonna look to improve the team, so he’s not done. I loved hearing that
Spitballing here; With the newfound extra cap: Mitts+ for Kadri back? I'd do it.I need the dominos to fall. I’m gonna die
Newfound extra cap? We gained 1 million dollars. One million.Spitballing here; With the newfound extra cap: Mitts+ for Kadri back? I'd do it.
Something is bound to happen with Chicago, though. Donato and Murphy, with the latter 50% retained? Or Jones with hopefully atleast 2,5 retained? Between the last two options I'd go fir the Jones one, to be honest.
Chicago only took on $250k in real salary, and actually gained over $1m in capspace, while pocketing a 3rd round pick. Good deal for them.That's my assumption too. The additional Avs / Hawks part was too difficult to work out, so they just pulled the trigger on what they had to get that locked in before someone has a season ending injury
If there is a separate trade, I would expect it would be seem a tad lopsided in Chicago's favor to account for their clear L in the three-way
Newfound extra cap? We gained 1 million dollars. One million.
This is true, didn't take that into account.The 2 for 1 means we also send down a player like Innala($870,000).
Hall wasn't a negative asset though, that's the holeChicago only took on $250k in real salary, and actually gained over $1m in capspace, while pocketing a 3rd round pick. Good deal for them.
They also lost the opportunity to trade Hall for a 2nd at the deadlineChicago only took on $250k in real salary, and actually gained over $1m in capspace, while pocketing a 3rd round pick. Good deal for them.