Try this:
Go to your user settings -> Your account -> Join User Groups and select Opt Out Of Live Threads.
Go to your user settings -> Your account -> Join User Groups and select Opt Out Of Live Threads.
100% this. If another team can stick him in their top 6 and keep him there through good and bad, I'm sure he'll be great for them. But I enjoy not having any one in the line up like we've had a lot of over the past few years, top 6 or nothing players. If Mercer has a couple off games in the top 6 he is still amazing in the bottom, Palat, Tatar, Zetterlund on and on. That's the type of team that you need to build.While I think he was jerked around too much (same with Zetterlund), top 6 ice time is earned. Holtz doesn't get to play because he hasn't been effective enough in a bottom 6 role to stick and he's not as good in the top 6 as anyone we currently have there.
While I think he was jerked around too much (same with Zetterlund), top 6 ice time is earned. Holtz doesn't get to play because he hasn't been effective enough in a bottom 6 role to stick and he's not as good in the top 6 as anyone we currently have there.
Sharangovich has spent most of the season in the bottom 6, and I think he's better at that role than Holtz.I don't like the idea of putting players in positions they're going to fail and then getting on them for failing. They had him there for camp and he looked really good. Then they took him out of that spot and put him into spots where he was doomed to not perform. Would it really be crazy to think he could outperform Yegor on that line?
Teams do practice (especially early in the season), my guess is he hasn’t shown much in practice either. Training camp and early season, a lot of decisions are made based on practice rather than just game performance.They didn’t give him a chance to start the year either. Has him there all camp only to drop him for game 1. He responds by playing a really good game. They respond by playing him 9 minutes and under 6 the following 2 games. He was never given a chance
He's also a pretty good forechecker. His main weakness is defensive zone coverage, which Holtz is also not good at.Sharangovich can at least contribute as a penalty killer if he isn’t scoring.
Fake newsits sh1t, I don`t believe. No one from other management said something like that. Only some twitter masters\influencers\writers etc. It`s faking narrative
Like my old pal said.Fake news
So this post is allowed to stand? Aight.You fixate on the dumbest shit. No, I don't think that - right away he would be put with Hughes or Nico. If it weren't working there, or something else weren't working, there is a possibility that something else would be tried, including him playing with Boqvist. Bratt played on the third line for a game or two. They like to try different things.
The key is, they try it with a top 9 - Wood has played up on the third line a bit, and at one point they were calling the McLeod line the third line, but they really do see that as a separate unit and don't mess with it. That is not true of the 7 other forwards who aren't Nico and Jack, who they will move around.
This is why Holtz is cooked hereHow many teams, in the midst of a cup push, put unproven rookies in the top 6?
One thing I've noticed with Rango at times is that he seems to have trouble getting pucks in deep and making the simple play. Don't know if I'm just focusing on him too hard, but I've noticed that a lot in the last few months.He's also a pretty good forechecker. His main weakness is defensive zone coverage, which Holtz is also not good at.
I think this might have to do with being up and down so much. As much as people fight the idea, certain lines are asked and expected to do different things. I think he sometimes fumbles between ideas of taking it in and keeping possession and just dumping and chasing.One thing I've noticed with Rango at times is that he seems to have trouble getting pucks in deep and making the simple play. Don't know if I'm just focusing on him too hard, but I've noticed that a lot in the last few months.
$9? No wonder he went to Columbus.They offered Johnny $9!!!! GTFO with that face news
This might be the case and I've thought about it. Glad I'm not the only one noticing that though, I don't like to unnecessarily harp on players lolI think this might have to do with being up and down so much. As much as people fight the idea, certain lines are asked and expected to do different things. I think he sometimes fumbles between ideas of taking it in and keeping possession and just dumping and chasing.
So you are saying we should just waive him?!This might be the case and I've thought about it. Glad I'm not the only one noticing that though, I don't like to unnecessarily harp on players lol
I still can't get over that avatar lol. Well played sir!He's also a pretty good forechecker. His main weakness is defensive zone coverage, which Holtz is also not good at.
So you are saying we should just waive him?!
I mean when your top two centers are Jack and Nico and your next two are Boqvist/Haula and McLeod there is kind of a top six difference hereSomeday people will learn that NHL teams do not think in terms of a top 6 and bottom 6, that it is clearly top 9 and bottom 3. But until then, we'll just deal with all the takes.